Ralston on Hosking and TV debates

Stuff reports:

Predictably, a lynch mob has formed now that TVNZ has announced broadcaster will be the moderator of its election . Note that I called him a broadcaster rather than a journalist. It is a distinction he makes himself.

Petitions have been launched demanding TVNZ replace him in the role because he is not politically neutral or, as New Zealand First’s Winston Peters says, he is “wholly unsuitable” and his appointment as moderator is “outrageous”.

You may recall similar complaints, but from the political right, at the last election about TV3 having John Campbell front their debates. Campbell, like Hosking, has strongly defined ideological opinions, even if the pair are at opposite ends of the political spectrum.

A difference is I’m not aware of anyone on the right ever launching a petition to not have someone removed as a debate moderator.

Having run several such leaders debates in the distant past I can verify that being moderator is a lot like being a traffic officer on points duty, indicating who should talk and who should hold their piece until the other is finished.

That was a role John Campbell performed admirably, despite his political opinions, in the 2014 debates. At the end of the show John Key, who was no bosom buddy of John Campbell, had no complaints about his handling of the programme, although he bitterly moaned to me that then Labour leader David Cunliffe “wouldn’t shut up” and he “couldn’t get a word in edgewise”. Such are political debates.

I have no doubt Mike Hosking, who has chaired such debates before will handle his programme just as competently. Every day he handles dozens of interviews, often involving more than one guest at a time, on his radio programme. He is used to it and the role of moderator is less interviewer and more presenter and host.

Both the Greens and Labour have no objection to Hosking or, at least, they are not voicing it.

Arden is showing her smarts by not complaining. Off memory I think Cunliffe or Labour did complain last time. Just makes you look sore.

Similarly the New Zealand First leader’s forlorn cries to be allowed into the National – Labour debate are likely to fall on deaf ears. The polls show that National and Labour will be the strongest parties by far and whoever wins will lead a coalition government. The 60 minute debate between the leaders of the two parties will be instrumental in allowing New Zealanders the chance to decide which one will do the better job of that.

It’s a debate between the two people who could be Prime Minister. Winston may have had a claim for entry when Little was leader, as there was a chance he could be Prime Minister if say he got 16% and Labour 21%. But now it is either Ardern or English.

There is a 90 minute debate programme where the several leaders of the minor parties can put their case as to why they would be a coalition partner and what their policy price may be but the decisive debates will be between the big two, National and Labour.

The debate with all the minor party leaders is more entertainment than a useful debate. It is possible this debate could include NZ First, Greens, ACT, United Future, Maori, Mana, TOP and maybe Conservatives.

Comments (153)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment

%d bloggers like this: