Austerity worked

The Telegraph reports:

Britain is now running a current budget surplus as tax revenues cover all day to day spending, for the first full year since 2001.

This surplus, which excludes capital investment by the Government, came in at £3.8bn for 2017, the Office for National Statistics said.

George Osborne set this as a target in 2010 and hoped to achieve it two years earlier in 2015.

They’re catching up to us. Well done. Their first surplus in 16 years!

Research published by the International Monetary Fund said Britain set an example for other countries to follow in slashing the deficit by cutting public spending, rather than raising taxes.

“Following the financial crisis, the two countries that adopted spending-based austerity and did better than the rest of the sample were Ireland and the UK,” said economists in the IMF’s Finance and Development publication.

“The result: growth in the United Kingdom was higher than the European average.”

It is increasingly important that other countries copy this approach, the researchers said, as Governments around the world have racked up too much debt which will harm growth and stifle productivity when interest rates rise.

The surge in global growth gives countries the perfect opportunity to cut their debt burdens – and they should do it by cutting spending rather than by raising taxes, before the economy slows down again and the debt burden becomes tougher to bear.

“Countries take a smaller hit to growth if they cut spending – including for entitlement programs – than if they raise taxes. In fact, the latter can be self-defeating, leading to even higher debt and lower growth,” said Camilla Lund Andersen, editor of the IMF magazine.

Sadly in NZ we have a Government that looks like it wants to massively hike the take take, despite the books being in surplus.

Studying a range of deficit-cutting programmes, the economists found spending cuts of 1pc of GDP hit economic growth by 0.5 percentage points relative to the trend rate of growth, with the dent put in growth lasting for less than two years.

If this is done at a time of economic growth it has no negative impact, so the economy grows even at a time of austerity.

By contrast plans based on tax hikes resulted in a two percentage point fall in GDP relative to its previous path.

“This large recessionary effect tends to last several years,” they said.

Increasing taxes reduces economic growth, and hence incomes and jobs.

Comments (33)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment