How the electorate polls did
Having looked at how the polls did with the party vote, I thought it would be interesting to also look at the electorate polls. There were 11 electorates with public electorate polls. Seven with Curia and four with Community Engagement.
| Electorate | Pollster | Date | Poll Winner | Actual Winner | Poll Margin | Actual Margin | Difference |
| Auckland Central | Curia | Oct-26 | Green | Green | 4% | 9% | 5% |
| Hutt South | Community Engagement | Sep-26 | Labour | Labour | 12% | 2% | 10% |
| Kapiti | Community Engagement | Jul-26 | Labour | National | 4% | 5% | 9% |
| Mt Albert | Curia | Oct-26 | Labour | Labour | 5% | 14% | 9% |
| Mt Roskill | Community Engagement | Oct-26 | Labour | Labour | 17% | 1% | 16% |
| Tamaki | Curia | Oct-26 | National | National | 18% | 15% | 3% |
| Tukituki | Curia | Oct-26 | National | National | 17% | 26% | 9% |
| Waitaki | Curia | Sep-26 | National | National | 23% | 21% | 2% |
| Wellington Bays | Curia | Sep-26 | Labour | Labour | 1% | 0% | 0% |
| Wellington North | Community Engagement | Oct-26 | Green | Green | 3% | 7% | 4% |
| West Coast – Tasman | Curia | Sep-26 | National | National | 6% | 18% | 12% |
Curia got the winner right in 7/7 polls and CE for it right for 3/4 polls.
If you look at the gap between the winning and second placed candidate, Curia had the gap under the maximum margin of error in six out of seven polls. In WCT, Katie Milne won by 18% margin compared to 6% in the poll.
Of the four CE polls, only one (Wgtn North) had the gap within the margin of error for their sample size. In Hutt South they had the gap 10% too large, in Mt Roskill 16% too large and in Kapiti a 4% margin for Labour was actually a 5% loss.
Then we have the Māori electorates. As I blogged previously, these are exceptionally hard seats to poll.
There were nine polls in the seven seats.
| Māori Electorates | |||||||
| Electorate | Pollster | Date | Poll Winner | Actual Winner | Poll Margin | Actual Margin | Difference |
| Hauraki-Waikato | Curia | Oct-26 | TPM | TPM | 23% | 40% | 17% |
| Ikaroa-Rawhiti | Curia | Oct-26 | Labour | Labour | 21% | 11% | 10% |
| Tamaki Makaurau | Curia | Oct-26 | TPM | TPM | 2% | 30% | 28% |
| Tamaki Makaurau | Horizon | Oct-26 | Labour | TPM | 8% | 30% | 38% |
| Te Tai Hauauru | Curia | Sep-26 | TPM | TPM | 12% | 14% | 2% |
| Te Tai Tokerau | Curia | Oct-26 | Greens | TPM | 7% | 2% | 9% |
| Te Tai Tokerau | Horizon | Oct-26 | Labour | TPM | 8% | 2% | 10% |
| Te Tai Tonga | Curia | Sep-26 | Labour | Labour | 15% | 11% | 4% |
| Waiariki | Curia | Oct-26 | TPM | TPM | 32% | 8% | 24% |
Curia got the winner right in 6/7 seats (which is a near miracle) and Horizon got the winner wrong in both seats they polled.
To be fair, events had an impact. The resigning of Kerrin Leoni as an endorsed Labour candidate occurred after both polls in that seat, and probably helped increased the TPM margin in that seat.
I also think the Te Tai Tokerau result was probably as a result of tactical voting to give TPM an extra overhang seat.
So overall I’m delighted Curia public polls correctly called 7/7 general seats and 6/7 Maori seats.
