Stuff reports:

A federal judge on Monday issued a stinging rejection of a Green Party-backed request to recount paper ballots in Pennsylvania’s presidential election, won by Republican Donald Trump, and scan some counties’ election systems for signs of hacking.

In his 31-page decision, US District Judge Paul Diamond said there were at least six grounds that required him to reject the Green Party’s lawsuit, which had been opposed by Trump, the Pennsylvania Republican Party and the Pennsylvania attorney general’s office.

Suspicion of a hacked Pennsylvania election “borders on the irrational” while granting the Green Party’s recount bid could “ensure that that no Pennsylvania vote counts” given Tuesday’s federal deadline to certify the vote for the Electoral College, Diamond wrote.

The recount application is delusional. You do recounts if the result is exceptionally close or there is actual proof of wrongdoing. But the US Greens are trying to have a recount, on the basis of “Just in case”.

“Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any `hack’ occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania’s voting system was not in any way compromised,” Diamond wrote. He also said the lawsuit suffered from a lack of standing, potentially the lack of federal jurisdiction and an “unexplained, highly prejudicial” wait before filing last week’s lawsuit.

So how about the other states?

A federal judge halted Michigan’s recount last week after three days. The Wisconsin recount was expected to conclude Monday. With about 95 percent of the votes recounted as of Sunday, Clinton had gained 25 votes on Trump, but still trailed by about 22,000.

So the margin has changed by around 0.1%

During the ten years of John Key’s leadership, National’s caucus unity was about as strong as you can get. Basically there wasn’t a single MP in caucus who thought that the party would do better with someone else as leader. This is very rare as usually about a quarter of any caucus think they should be leader 🙂

So if the scale of caucus unity goes from 0 to 10, National under John Key was around a 9.5.

So what is caucus unity going to be now under new leadership. No one should expect it will be the same. This doesn’t mean infighting and plots – just that caucus members will be a bit bolder with their views, and happier to share them if they think things aren’t quite right.

It will be a return to politics as normal, but what is normal?

Well if National under Key was a 9.5 and say Labour under Cunliffe was a 0.01 then what is National under English? Too early to tell, but probably a 7.5 to an 8.0. Still pretty high, as you are in Government and by far the most dominant party. But that rating may change.

What would be the other parties at the moment in terms of caucus unity? My estimates would be:

• Labour under Little – say a 5.5. Definitely higher than in the past, but far from settled. Lots of Labour MPs are openly very unhappy.
• NZ First under Winston – both a 9.0 and a 4.0. A 9.0 for Winston’s leadership – his rule is absolute. But a 4.0 for the battle to be his sucessor which is brutal.
• Greens under Shaw and Turei – say a 6.5 – significant grumblings but no real desire to change anything this side of the election.

Claire Trevett reports:

He indicated infrastructure would be a priority, saying the Government would continue to invest in roading, public transport, schools and housing that were needed to support a strong economy and growing population.

It would also deliver “smarter” ways to help the most vulnerable, such as the investment approach to the delivery of social services. English has been a driving force of that and said he expected to retain some overview.

“This will be a Government supporting economic growth and ensuring the benefits of growth are widely shared.”

Traditionally National has focused on growing and Labour on sharing. Of course you need the growing to fund the sharing and a balanced Government focused on both.

However, English refused to commit to the Key’s 2008 promise not to change the pension age, saying it would be among a stocktake of National’s policies would take place before the 2017 election.

“I’m not making the same pledge as the previous Prime Minister did. That was a product of its time where there was a need to establish trust and I think it was a sound decision then. The election was followed by a recession which could have caused real insecurity for older people.

Good. This doesn’t mean National will raise the age of entitlement. It doesn’t even mean National won’t rule it out next term. It means English is not making the same commitment as Key to never ever raise it no matter what – which turned out to be with hindsight a real mistake (even if politically necessary at the time).

No doubt Labour are already booking ad space to run a scare campaign that will falsely claim National is going to increase the age. The fact this was their policy last election won’t stop them.

Setting out his leadership philosophy, English quoted a line from Selina Tusitala Marsh’s poetry which he heard at a Women’s Leadership Conference. “She said, ‘lead and dig up the diamonds around you.”

He expanded on that later, saying he was referring to the diamonds in New Zealand society.

“I’ve never been in a community where there isn’t someone with the vision and energy to change how it works, so I suppose someone else said something that I meant, and that’s why I quoted it.”

“The Government isn’t the answer to everything, most of our answers are in our own families and communities. Sometimes Government gets in the way of that. This is a Government that will be focussed on understanding, at a very individual level, what is going to work with people and then supporting them to achieve it.”

There are some things that only the Government can do such as pass laws, set policy, fund through taxation certain services. But Bill has always said that most of the answers do not lie with Government.

English said decisions on an election date would not be made until early next year. However, he ruled out going early to the polls simply because David Shearer’s departure would cause a by-election.

“I think one of the worse reasons for having an election in New Zealand is the fact Labour are losing their moderate members, and their competent members. So no, we won’t be driven by their internal problems. We are driven by what works for New Zealand, not what works for the Labour Party.”

How many moderates will be left in Labour after the election? Nash and O’Connor maybe?

Asked if he would give Key a knighthood, English grinned and joked “well, it’s not as if he’s never asked.”

Some of the left on Twitter have gone mad about this, not able to realise it was a joke.

Having said that it would be highly unusual for John Key not to be offered a knighthood in the future. Every Prime Minister who has served more than a few months has been offered a titular honour.

While he described himself as an ‘active Catholic’ who was opposed to abortion and euthanasia, he said he would probably vote differently on the gay marriage bill now.

Bill’s comments on this issue was very interesting. He said he had concluded that allowing same sex couples to marry hadn’t undermined marriage for others, but actually extended the institution. Very pleased to see him say this.

Phil Quin writes at Stuff:

Let’s be honest: few outside his notoriously bolshy inner circle could contend with a straight face that the Andrew Little is a naturally gifted politician.

The Labour leader is a grafter, whose talents fail to match his ambitions by some considerable margin. 

The “Angry Andy” thing has stuck, as tends to happen when alliterative nicknames align so neatly with public perception.

Little approaches media interviews as hand to hand combat; his tone veering between defensive and pugilistic.

It’s as if he considers questions from journalists impertinent by their very nature.

What’s more, Little often seems woefully underprepared for what should be considered straightforward lines of inquiry.

It’s hard to tell who dreads the Labour leader’s TV appearances the most: Little himself, the interviewer, or the viewing public, all of whom cringe to varying degrees through the awkward encounters.

I understand there is an unofficial competition between some journalists as to whom can get Little to turn into Angry Andy the quickest in an interview!

John Key’s unexpected resignation gives Andrew Little the rarest of opportunities, namely the chance to reintroduce himself to the New Zealand public. He won’t get another one. …

Andrew Little should be Labour’s candidate in the by-election to replace Shearer.

The Greens should stand aside to help the Labour romp home, just as Michael Wood did in Mt Roskill. 

The notoriously risk averse Little should hold no fear for Mt Albert. The other electorate for which he is touted, the Wellington-based seat of Rongotai, is a harder lift.

For one thing, he will face a general election turnout in Rongotai, whereas the Mt Albert by-election, like the neighbouring Mt Roskill, will likely see a drastic drop off in National Party voters.

This will help them to the kind of thumping victory he is unlikely to achieve in a general election context, especially when you consider the demands on him to run to spearhead Labour’s nationwide effort. 

All in all, a storming victory in Mt Albert will give Little the elusive aura of a winner, something even his closest friends would have to concede he does not currently possess.

It would also mean that Little got four to six weeks of publicity, which would normally be a god send for an opposition leader.

Imagine the precious air time a Little candidacy in Mt Albert will give the Labour leader: several weeks to showcase Little as a retail campaigner; to give voters a sustained look at the alternative PM just as they are formulating their perceptions of English in the top job.

Why on earth would you squander such serendipity by nominating some generic Labour candidate whose victory in Mt. Albert will be forgotten long before the real campaign starts? 

It’s more than just that Little should run in Mt Albert. It’s that he would be mad not to. 

A couple of days ago I heard a rumour that Little was considering standing in Mt Albert, so I tweeted it. Within almost seconds Little responded in full Angry Andy mode saying that I was part of a Dirty Politics campaign against him etc etc and that he was definitely not standing. Labour now regards anything they don’t like as Dirty Politics!

As Quin points out, there would be considerable advantages in Little standing in Mt Albert. That is all based on an assumption that Little would win though.  If Little was the candidate every National activist in Auckland would turn out to campaign for the National candidate, and a Little victory might not be assured. So perhaps that is why not running is the smarter thing – he can’t risk losing another electorate contest.

The Herald reports:

Shearer is expected to be formally announced as the head of the UN’s mission in war-torn South Sudan on Tuesday and will resign almost immediately. His job starts at the end of January.

That will spark a byelection in his Mt Albert seat unless English opts for an early election, which is unlikely.

Labour’s candidate is likely to be MP Jacinda Ardern, who now lives in the electorate but was initially aiming for a third tilt at winning the marginal Auckland Central seat.

She said yesterday she was yet to make up her mind. If Ardern won Mt Albert, Labour could bring in another List MP – Little is understood to be keen to get Raymond Huo back into Parliament before the election to give Labour Chinese representation.

The next candidates on Labour’s List are Maryan Street and Moana Mackey. To get Huo in, they would both have to turn down their spot. Street is 61 but Mackey just aged 42.

The Press editorial:

Politics watchers expect a fresh election in September 2017. But there are increasing reasons for English to call an early election. Testing his leadership is just one of them. Labour MP David Shearer is resigning to take up a role with the United Nations in South Sudan in the new year, which would trigger a by-election in Mt Albert. 

Under normal circumstances, the by-election could happen in the early months of 2017. But these are not normal circumstances. There was a by-election in the neighbouring electorate of Mt Roskill this month. By-elections are expensive, with the $947,000 cost of the Northland by-election in 2015 being typical. An early election would avoid the expense of a new contest in Mt Albert. 

What a silly argument. General elections cost in excess of $40 million, so you spend $40 million to save $1 million! Having the election earlier may mean over time we have more general elections than otherwise we would have had.

Also a June election in 2017 would mean the 2020 election would be no later than August, causing two winter elections in a row – which won’t help turnout.

A better thing to do is change the law so that by-elections are not necessary for say nine months before an election instead of six months.

On John Key’s final day as Prime Minister I can’t find a better tribute to him than the words of 21 year old Jake Millar.

Jake wrote:

It was C.S. Lewis who once said “Integrity is doing the right thing, even when no one is watching.”

This is perhaps the greatest lesson I have learnt from our outgoing Prime Minister, John Key, a man who changed my life by doing just that.

When I was 15-years-old, on Saturday the 4th of September in 2010, my father, Rod Miller, died in a skydiving plane crash in Fox Glacier, which killed nine people.

It was the worst plane crash New Zealand had experienced in 17 years, and it tore many people apart. …

Following the plane crash, John Key took the four-hour return drive from Hokitika to Fox Glacier to visit the crash site, and pay his respects to the victims.

John Key’s humanness and kindness inspired me during this difficult time, so I wrote to him as a 15-year-old, thanking him for caring, while asking him for some advice in regards to my own future.

I was amazed to receive a very personal letter back directly from the Prime Minister.

Not only did he address all of my points issue by issue in an extremely kind and personal way, but he also enclosed a card, saying he wanted to meet me.

Something not widely known about John is that he hand wrote a response to every kid who wrote him a letter. I understand it would be the last thing he did every evening before he crashed. He knew the difference it could make to get a personal response.

Several months later, John Key, while visiting the West Coast to see the victims’ families of the Pike River mine disaster, came to our family home in Greymouth for whitebait sandwiches, a cup of tea and a chat about my future.

He didn’t publicise the visit for political profit. No media were invited. He did it out of the goodness of his heart, because he wanted to help, and because he cared.

Jake’s story will not be unique.

It was the goodness of John Key’s heart that inspired me to try my hardest in life, and strive to be the best version of me that I could be.

I vividly remember being inspired by the fact that John Key had lost his father as a young kid, before achieving his childhood dream. I remember thinking, ‘if he could, why couldn’t I?’

I recall after Pike River John speaking to the kids who had lost a father and telling them that while this will be their darkest day, and they will worry that they will never be happy again, that he wanted to reassure them that you could have a very good and happy life despite losing your father at a young age.

Inspired by John Key’s story, I worked with hunger and a sense of purpose to achieve my goal of becoming Head Boy of Christchurch Boys’ High School, and Head Boy of Adams House, the School’s boarding house, becoming the first student in 11 years to hold both roles.

I then made the decision to turn down a $40,000 law scholarship and start my first startup OOMPHER, which was acquired by Careers New Zealand, a Crown Entity of the New Zealand Government, in May 2015, only 10 months after I launched it.

Today, as the Co-Founder of Unfiltered, I have the great honour of travelling all over the world, interviewing the biggest names in global business, growing my second startup, Unfiltered, living a dream life between Auckland and New York City.

Inspiring – 21 years old and onto his second startup.

The point to all of this is not that I’m something great, but that it’s all been inspired by that early spark of inspiration: when John Key wrote to me.

I remember running into John Key at a National Party function years after our first meeting, and he asked how my Mum’s art business was going. He had only met her once, years earlier. This showed how much he truly cared.

That’s a great memory.

Whether you loved or hated his politics, as Prime Minister, John Key was a good man. He had integrity. He cared about the people he represented. He did the right thing, even when no one was watching. …

I am unsure how many lives John Key has changed over the years, but I know that mine was one of them. For that, I will be forever grateful.

I suspect this tribute from Jake will mean more to John than all the speeches in Parliament when he leaves the House.

In the Sleaford and North Hykeham by-election, Labour dropped 7.1% from their 2015 result to come 4th behind both UKIP and the Liberal Democrats.

The Guardian reports:

Labour MPs have said they fear the party is pursuing a “0% strategy” because of the lack of clarity on Brexit, after the disappointing byelection result in Sleaford and North Hykeham in which Labour slipped from second place to fourth.

MPs said they believed the party was alienating both sides of the referendum debate by defending freedom of movement but promising to push through with leaving the EU.

Caroline Johnson, a paediatrician, held the Lincolnshire seat for the Conservatives with 17,570 votes, ahead of Victoria Ayling of Ukip, whose share of the vote fell by two percentage points from 2015.

Labour’s vote dropped by seven points and the Liberal Democrats went up by five points to take third place.

The Croydon North MP, Steve Reed, said: “Labour risks becoming the party of the 0% if we manage to upset both remainers and leavers by equivocating our position.

Will Labour survive Corbyn?

Kelly McParland writes in the National Post:

I’m willing to bet that most Canadians had never heard of John Key before they readtoday that he’s stepping down as prime minister of New Zealand. If they gave the news the usual cursory glance, they probably assumed he was leaving because a) he got caught in a scandal, b) is so unpopular he has no chance of re-election, or c) he knew he was cooked and wanted to avoid the embarrassment of being forced to quit over a or b.

What makes Key’s departure noteworthy, however, is that none of the above apply. He appears to be quitting because he feels he’s accomplished enough, and genuinely wants to spend more time with his family. A politician leaving office before being forced out by circumstances. Imagine that.

Almost unheard of.

His three mates, Abbott, Cameron and Harper all went out the normal way. Key avoided that.

From all available reports (I admit my first-hand experience with New Zealand politics is limited), Key looks to be an authentic success story. He has been party leader since 2006 and prime minister since 2008. He led his party to three successive victories and appeared set to add a fourth next year. No major scandals stain his name. When he first entered politics his party had just suffered a serious drubbing at the polls; six years later he lifted them to power, and they’ve been there ever since.

He goes out with National polling 27% ahead of Labour.

Canada’s history is loaded with examples of politicians who didn’t know when to go (or, even if they did know, refused to leave anyway). John Diefenbaker had to be dragged from office kicking and screaming, then glued himself to the opposition leader’s bench until a party rebellion arose against him. Pierre Trudeau stuck around so long he was defeated by Joe Clark, then ended his comeback just in time for his successor to be decimated by Brian Mulroney. Mulroney, in turn, successfully exited office in time for his Tories to be reduced from 156 seats to two

Term limits could be a good idea!

It all reflects the iron ego that motivates so many electees. They run for office because they’ve convinced themselves the people need them. Far too many have little experience in any job that didn’t depend on public funding. Once handed some authority, they are loath to ever let it go, because it’s too crucial to their own self-image. In the end, serving the public has little to do with it; it’s all about protecting their sense of self-worth.

John Key appears to be an exception. A lot of elected people in Canada should study the example he’s set and look in the mirror. The world would be a better place, and politics a much more respectable calling, if others followed his example.

Key never measured his self worth by political power. He achieved enough outside politics to avoid that.

Stuff reports:

Joseph Parker proved as good as his word as he became the first New Zealand-born heavyweight world boxing champion.

An impressive Parker battled hard over the back end of the fight to beat Mexico’s Andy Ruiz in Auckland on Saturday night to win the vacant WBO belt by majority points decision.

The judges scored the 12-round bout 114-114, 115-113, 115-113 – a reflection of how close it was.

Parker is an impressive boxer and great he now has a world title. However I note it was for a vacant title, not against a proven champion.

Parker’s quest now will be to go on and unify the top of the sport’s glamour division. The WBO belt represents the first rung on a ladder of four to the ultimate glory as the undisputed champion.

The IBF, WBA and WBC wait and there will be genuine concern and caution in those areas as Parker continues to do more than just rattle the ranks.

If he can unify the titles, then he will indeed be a world champion. He is on his way.

So Bill English will become Prime Minister on Monday and Paula Bennett the Deputy Prime Minister. Both quite remarkable outcomes, in different ways.

For Bill, after his huge election loss in 2002, the conventional wisdom was he would never become Prime Minister. He lost the leadership the next year, and then as Key ascended the assumption was that when Key went, the leadership would go to the next generation.

But no one thought Key would go at the height of popularity for National, polling at 50%. The assumption was it would happen after an election loss, or heading into an election National was unlikely to win. Then you would go to the next generation. But Key shocked almost everyone by going out on top, and at a time when the economy was so strong, that Finance Minister English was the logical replacement.

Paula’s ascendancy is remarkable in a different way. When she was a 17 year old teenage Maori solo mother, the thought that one day she would be Deputy Prime Minister would have been thought farcical. Key’s rise to the top was as the son of a solo mother, but Paula’s was as a solo mother herself.

And could you imagine even a couple of decades ago, that a National Party Deputy Prime Minister would be a former teenage solo mother?

So it is now the Bill and Paula show. And while they both got there on the basis of their success as Ministers, the way they balance each other would be hard to engineer a better outcome showing the broad church that National now is. Look at their profiles

• Bill is a social conservative and Paula a social liberal
• Bill is/was a South Islander and Paula an Aucklander
• Bill is male and Paula female
• Bill is Caucasian and Paula Maori
• Bill is a bit reserved and Paula rather less so
• Bill is rural and Paula urban

Now none of this means they will be successful in their new roles. That will come down to how they lead, their decisions on Cabinet, on policy, how they respond to issues, their communication skills, their empathy etc. But it does indicate they have the potential to do a well balanced leadership team.

The Herald reports:

The Green Party has released its updated drug law reform policy, which would regulate access to cannabis and allow for medicinal cannabis.

It would mean adults will no longer be criminalised for growing or using small amounts of marijuana.

Health spokesperson Julie Anne Genter says the policy is evidence based, and criminalisation of marijuana does more harm than good.

She says the laws are out of date and decriminalisation would mean people’s mental and physical wellbeing is prioritised ahead of making them a criminal.

Ms Genter says it would allow the drug to be regulated and create safer communities.

It would also open the door to medical marijuana – doctors would be able to prescribe the drug for chronically ill patients.

I agree with them on this. Criminalising it has not worked and is being abandoned.

The situation in the US is:

• Legal for recreational use in eight states
• Decriminalised for recreational use in 13 states
• Legal for medical use (but not recreational) in 24 states
• Prohibited entirely in five states

Stuff reports:

The future shape of Wellington’s Shelly Bay revamp is becoming clearer, with new plans hinting at more than 350 homes, a boutique hotel, a brewery, a rest home and a ferry service.

If I had to go into a rest home one day, I’d want one at Shelly Bay.

But Wellingtonians, who own a large chunk of Shelly Bay, will not get a say on whether resource consent for the $500 million development on the Miramar Peninsula site should get the final tick.

The non-notified resource consent is currently was working its way through Wellington City Council processes and only council staff – not even elected councillors – will decide whether it gets the green light.

As is proper. If an application complies with the rules, it should not be subject to a popular vote. It is a matter between land owner and developer.

According to the consent application there will be a 140-resident rest home, a boutique hotel with 50-odd rooms, 280 apartments, 58 townhouses and 14 standalone houses at Shelly Bay. …

There was also potential for a community centre, micro-brewery, restaurant, cafe, artist’s studio and shop, a gym, childcare and a medical centre.

Please let there be a cafe there!

Simon Bridges has conceded in the Deputy Leadership election which means Paula Bennett will be elected Deputy Leader of the National Party on Monday and then appointed Deputy Prime Minister.

News.com.au reports:

Outlining her strategy to counter a wave of populism that has consumed key allies abroad, Merkel vowed there would not be a repeat of last year’s record refugee influx.

She also stressed it was legitimate for Germany to expect newcomers to integrate, and this included rejection of the niqab full-face veil.

“The full veil must be banned wherever it is legally possible,” she told the annual gathering of her centre-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU).

I’m not into banning particular pieces of clothing but I think society can say that we don’t want people walking around with no face showing at all – whether that be balaclavas or niqab. How can people integrate if you can’t even show your face.

Fairfax have announced new moderation rules for comments. They are not to :

* contain offensive language (including use of symbols);

* include personal attacks of any kind (including mocking other readers, or abusing Fairfax journalists or contributors);

* are likely to offend or target any ethnic, racial, nationality or religious group;

* are homophobic, transphobic, sexist, offensive or obscene;

* contain spam or include links to other sites;

* are clearly off topic;

* impersonate an individual or organisation, are fraudulent, defamatory of any person, threatening or invasive of another’s privacy or otherwise illegal;

* are trolling or threatening;

* infringe on copyrights or trademarks;

* are self-promoting;

* violate the law or breach court-ordered suppressions or have the potential to breach future suppressions; or

* constitute a contempt of court or that contain details of cases and individuals before the courts;

* violate our terms and conditions for user generated content;

* are too long (we recommend no more than approximately 200 words);

*promote, advertise or solicit the sale of any goods or services

* just generally aren’t very nice.

Most of them look sensible but some are rather subjective.

Nicolas Pirsoul writes in the Herald:

Isis, Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram, and other terrorist organisations are all inspired by a particular understanding of Islam: Salafism.

Salafism is an extremist, literalist, and intolerant form of Sunni Islam. Its origins are hard to trace, but it is commonly argued that 13/14th century theologian Ibn Taymiyyah strongly influenced the development of modern Salafi thought nearly five hundred years later. …

In Belgium, my country of birth, the March 22 bombings which killed 32 civilians and injured over 300, revealed two major issues: the strong presence of Salafi ideology in Belgian Sunni mosques on the one hand and the ignorance and leniency of Belgian authorities towards this issue on the other. These two major problems are also evident in many other Western nations.

Indeed, a number of Belgian investigative journalists have exposed the radical discourse of several preachers in Brussels and other cities. These Salafi-minded discourses are heavily at odds with values such as democracy, freedom of speech, or religious tolerance.

These preachers are not terrorists but they provide the environment for extremism to flourish.

First, it is important to recognise the existence of a problem and not to underestimate it. The recent hate speech controversy, involving a cleric from the at-Taqwa mosque in Manukau, is only the tip of the iceberg and follows a well-established pattern of other events involving Salafi clerics preaching in New Zealand, such as Egyptian cleric Sheikh Abu Abdullah a couple of years ago. It would be naïve to think that our nation’s Sunni oriented mosques are immune to Salafi ideology and its intolerant and sometimes violent interpretation of Islam.

We are far from immune.

Second, it is important to understand and adopt the right attitude towards the problem of Islamic extremism. Extremism thrives on division. Mainstream stereotyping and discrimination against Muslims has helped Salafism, and its Manichean worldview, to grow in Europe. It is therefore critical that New Zealand should remain an inclusive and tolerant nation by embracing its diverse Muslim community.

The majority of Muslims, conservatives or not, reject violence and intolerance. They are allies in the fight against terrorism.

By creating a New Zealand model of multicultural citizenship, where Kiwis of all ethnic groups and faiths live with and are supportive of each other, we can become a role model for the world and avoid replicating other nations’ mistakes.

Well said.

Cato has published their 2016 Human Freedom Index. The top 10 are:

1. Hong Kong
2. Switzerland
3. New Zealand
4. Ireland
5. Denmark
6. Canada
7. UK
8. Australia
9. Finland
10. Netherlands

NZ is up one place from 2014. We are ranked 22nd for personal freedom and 3rd for economic freedom.

Our group scores (out of 10) are”

1. Movement 10.00
2. Relationship 10.00
3. Security and safety 9.86
4. Sound money 9.45
5. Expression and information 9.33
6. Association 8.75
7. Legal system & property rights 8.73
8. Freedom to trade 8.65
9. Regulation 8.51
10. Rule of law 7.9
11. Religion 7.50
12. Size of Government 6.39

I dunno but this, from Bill Sutton letter to the Herald today, seems pretty noxious to me. pic.twitter.com/jx1bPcSKEu

— Toby Manhire (@toby_etc) December 7, 2016

It is indeed noxious. A nasty little anti-semitic dig, which incidentally is also incorrect. Vogel and Bell were also Jewish New Zealanders who became Prime Minister.

And who is Bill Sutton of Napier? Well presumably it is the former Labour MP who was in Parliament from 1984 to 1990.

Treasury has a useful pdf summarising the Half Year Economic and Fiscal Update. Key data includes:

• GDP forecast to grow at 3.7% this year and 3.5% next year
• Unemployment rate to drop to 4.2% by 2019
• Net migration to slow from 70,000 to 20,000
• Inflation to sneak up to 2%
• OBEGAL surpluses of:
  • $0.5b in 2017
  • $3.3b in 2018
  • $5.4b in 2019
  • $6.8b in 2020
  • $8.5n in 2021
• NZ Super Fund contributions to resume in 2021
• Net debt to reduce from 2018
• Cost of NZ Super to go from $12.3b this year to $16.0b in 2021
• Core crown expenses to go from 29.4% of GDP to 27.7%
• Core crown revenue to go from $76.1b this year to $97.1b in 2021

There is no doubt in my mind that tax cuts are a matter of when and how much, not if. No National led Government can soak up an $8.5 billion surplus by only increasing spending. That is what Cullen did.

We are one of the few countries in the world to have such a great set of books, and such strong economic growth forecast. Surplus give options – you can pay off debt, reduce taxes and increase spending. A sensible government will do all three, not just one or two of them.