Winston Peters has produced a phone record which backs up billionaire Owen Glenn’s timeline of events around a $100,000 donation towards the New Zealand First leader’s legal costs.
And not just their earlier testimony under oath, but everything they have said is cast into doubt.
The email, produced by Mr Glenn, shows Mr Henry referred to the phone conversation with “my client” at the precise time of the phone call.
Mr Henry has previously denied the “client” was Mr Peters.
But today in a video-linked appearance before the committee Mr Henry changed crucial parts of his story.
He acknowledged that Mr Peters must be the client referred to.
Now remember he denied multiple times Peters was the client. He denied this directly to the Privileges Committee.
Phone records from Mr Peters which he promised the committee last week and which were released today show Mr Peters called him one minute after he finished talking to Mr Glenn.
Mr Henry’s email was sent one minute after his phone call with Mr Peters ended.
The truth comes out. Not that it wasn’t already out for 99% of NZ.
Mr Glenn has said Mr Peters asked for the $100,000 donation in their phone call.
But Mr Henry today gave the committee a different explanation, although he acknowledged he had little recollection of the actual events.
He said he had spoken to Mr Glenn in either late November or early December asking for a donation.
Prove it. Where is the phone log?
He said the phone call from Mr Peters on December 14, which was presumably coincidental, reminded him to follow up with Mr Glenn, which he immediately did.
“That jogged my memory to seek a donation,” he said.
This is just so much bullshit. Their story has changed so many times, to fit the facts, it is just beyond belief.
Now let us make this simple for Helen:
- Owen Glenn phoned Winston at 1.27 pm
- That call ended at 1.33 pm
- Winston phoned Brian Henry at 1.34 pm
- That call ended at 1.39 pm
- At 1.40 pm Brian Henry sent Owen Glenn the bank account details for the donation
I am sure Helen or Michael Cullen will find a way to put it all down to an innocent explanation.
NZPA also report:
Mr Glenn has denied having any dealings with Mr Henry, prompting calls for Mr Henry to produce phone records to back up his claim.
But Mr Henry said the call was made around the time of Mr Peters’ Tauranga electoral petition, between November 22 and December 1, 2005, and he was staying in a motel that only kept phone records dating back to 2006.
Well this is very easy to resolve. The motel may not have kept phone records, but Telecom certainly will have. Not that there is any real doubt, but if the Privileges Committee thinks Henry is telling the truth (this time!), then they can easily verify it by asking Telecom (and Telecom cannot refuse) to supply the phone records for those 10 days for the motel. Telecom keep these records for at least seven years.