About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

June 8, 2007 7:09am by David Farrar

Most popular name in the UK this year

Guess what name for baby boys, will be No 1 in he UK by the end of the year?

Share this:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading…

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment109

Uncategorised
International Politics

Related Stories

Iceland Nanny State
100 things we didn’t know this time last year
UK Labour now third place with working class

Comments (109)

Login to comment or vote

Redbaiter

“I think”

Well of course you would think, but who cares???
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 6:15pm
james cairney

“”mindsets of those that abuse and label are the mindsets that lie behind tyranny.” Those are your words, not mine you shallow fuckwit.”

They were yours actually: “The left call other people bigots and deniers with the objective of shutting down debate.” and there was “When a thread ends up as this one has, in a frenzy of senseless hate from multi-knicked abusers of what is such an excellent discussion forum, its usually best just to let it die. However, there’s a point to be made here. The behaviour of Woppo and others (if there are others, personally I doubt there are that many) should serve as a reminder of the mindset that underpins tyranny.”

and let’s not forget this gem: “DM’s use of the terms “anti muslim bigot” and “climate change denier” are examples of the left’s cowardly thuggish anti-intellectual attempts to silence opposition to their ideas. Labeling [sic] dissenters with such emotive and pejorative names has been a trick the left have used successfully throughout history. In Stalin’s times for example, the people who ended up dead or in gulags for expressing “unapproved” ideas were referred to as “blasphemers,” “renegades,” “fascists,” “counter revolutionarys” and “enemies of the people.” ”

And Redbaiter follows that with : fool, loser, arsehole, deranged pseudo-liberal, etc etc….

hahahaha, what a thrashing! and with your own words as well, too easy boy!

You are obviously not used to winning, but don’t get so angry, you can still learn (I assume you’re only very young). Just relax and try not to contradict yourself. Such as, if you proclaim, ‘he who does X is a Y!’ Be sure not to do X yourself, unless you happen to be proud to be a Y (and for goodness sake don’t do X in the same thread!).

It’s a trap for young players, but keep trying, because your failures are pretty fucking funny!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 6:34pm
Redbaiter

“They were yours actually:”

You so sweepingly declare, and then, to illustrate your point, post a completely different set of words. These ones-

“The left call other people bigots and deniers with the objective of shutting down debate.”

Whereas the sentence you composed said this-

“”mindsets of those that abuse and label are the mindsets that lie behind tyranny.”

Really, if you truly cannot detect that these two sentences have completely different meanings then I know I’m dealing with yet another leftist retard whose comprehensive skills are almost equal to a those of a garden slug. I’ll try again. The difference is the declared objective James.

But hell, I’ve already tried to explain this to you what, four five times, and each time you keep coming back with the same shit like some kind of malfunctioning robot. I guess its all part and parcel of being a leftist. If you did have your wits about you, you wouldn’t be one.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 7:42pm
Fred

Easy peeecy…

Maybe NZ wants a significant Sharia Law craving, misogynist, death to homosexuals, democracy hating, imman ruled, 7th century religious mob of arseholes as immigrants.

Who knows?
Maybe NZ does not.

Let’s vote.

It’s called a referendum.
But first let’s have a referendum to make referendums binding, like Aust.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 8:21pm
Andrew W

So RB, like many of histories dictators you’re a social conservative, perhaps you are now prepared to accept that you don’t need the big government of socialism to have a totalitarian regime, infact most of the dictators of the recent past haven’t been socialists but rather they have been social/religious conservatives – like you!

I’ve already mentioned Franco and Pinochet, Hitler is another, Hitler didn’t need big government ownership of the state, like most people brighter than you, he understood that it’s control that’s important, not ownership of a states resources, I could run through a list of Christian and Muslim religious conservative leaders, who, like you, believed in their own rightousness, and like you, the evilness of those who dared to disagree with them.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 8:24pm
james cairney

” … should serve as a reminder of the mindset that underpins tyranny”

You missed those, they were your words, and they make the point that you are running scared from you fucking coward. Loser!

It is your words that serve (by your own declaration no less) as a reminder of the mindset that underpins tyranny. You have been absolutely drilled today sunshine (by four different posters), learn from this. Tosser.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 9:32pm
james cairney

And while I’m at it I’ll even smash your ‘declared objective’ argument to smithereens (because you are easy to me, it takes no effort). If, by your rationale, a totalitarian dictator in ‘labelling to socially stigmatise’ an opponent, states his objective is in fact to further political diversity and for small government then how the fuck are you two any different!!!

“declared” objectives are not worth a dime you intellectual failure!

Objectively assessed objectives are the only objectives worth discussing. And, objectively, you label and abuse more than those who you condemn for it!!!!!

You are out of your fucking league boy! Let’s play on.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 9:43pm
Redbaiter

Isn’t it weird the way leftists spend half the argument declaring themselves the victor? The obvious conflict of interest that might arise from a contestant appointing themselves as umpire never seems to enter their tiny minds.

Gosh and there you are James, quoting completely out of context again, desperately trying to make my words means something that will justify your argument.

What I said was “The behaviour of Woppo and others (if there are others, personally I doubt there are that many) should serve as a reminder of the mindset that underpins tyranny.”

“Behaviour” James, not “words”. I was referring to the cowardly attacks and misuse of this forum that they have indulged in. The multiple nicks, the completely off topic false allegations. Maybe you knew that. Given your comprehension is so poor, I’m prepared to grant you the benefit of the doubt.

As for your absurd fantasies concerning what a totalitarian dictator might say, for God’s sake give it a rest. As if that would ever be a trustworthy declaration. Just as you can tell Andrew W’s leftist allegiances from his actions rather than his words, anyone knows a totalitarian dictator is never going to allow political diversity, and as for small weak government, well if he believed in that he wouldn’t exist. For fucks sake you’re so desperate its pitiful.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 10:29pm
Andrew W

“anyone knows a totalitarian dictator is never going to allow political diversity”

After all the venomous attacks you have made on those who disagree with you, I can’t imagine you tolerating political diversity if you had the power, if this was your blog, few of us wouldn’t be band.
“and as for small weak government, well if he believed in that he wouldn’t exist.”???
Are you refering to this comment RB:”I cannot be a tyrant or a totalitarian when I advocate for small unnoticeable powerless government.”

Those are your words, not mine, sorry I forgot to use speech marks when quoting you on that occasion. I wouldn’t advocate “unnoticeable powerless government.” Government still needs noticable power, but ultimately the power needs to be under the control of the people.
You also have made it clear in the past that you are in favour of governments being able to dictate morality through the power of law, hardly a position of advocating “unnoticeable powerless government”.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 11:18pm

More comments:

‹
1
2

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« 12 Mb/sec to all homes in Aussie

Hilton back in jail »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 13K other subscribers

Highlights

Target achieved II
Good progress on attendance
Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments

Top Stories

General Debate 03 June 2026
Another British policing scandal
General Debate 04 June 2026
A win for democracy
Meet the Greens - ACC
Democrat says lock up the Jews
$600k on a website for a building!
Abolishing HR
General Debate 02 June 2026
Of course GP wait times will skyrocket under Labour

Recent Posts

Abolishing HR 4 June 2026
General Debate 04 June 2026 4 June 2026
Meet the Greens – ACC 4 June 2026
Democrat says lock up the Jews 3 June 2026
Another British policing scandal 3 June 2026
General Debate 03 June 2026 3 June 2026
A win for democracy 3 June 2026
$600k on a website for a building! 2 June 2026
Set housing outcomes not outputs 2 June 2026
General Debate 02 June 2026 2 June 2026
Of course GP wait times will skyrocket under Labour 2 June 2026
Which language should be used first? 1 June 2026

Recent Comments

General Debate 04 June 2026
Steve Todd
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ian Boag
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
Abolishing HR
Inandout
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
MCōs
Abolishing HR
artemisia
Abolishing HR
David Garrett
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
artemisia
General Debate 04 June 2026
Ghost
General Debate 04 June 2026
peterwn
General Debate 04 June 2026
MCōs
General Debate 04 June 2026
Jethrod

Links

"The principal view of human laws is, or ought always to be, to explain, protect, and enforce such rights as are absolute, which in themselves are few and simple."
Not PC
The response to Budget 2026 has been unusually muted
Point of Order
You know what “does not pass the sniff test”? Labour’s incremental response to blatant corruption – this is why they plunged 7.5%
The Daily Blog
When is a Free Speech Union not a Free Speech Union?
The Standard
We Are a Country That Decided Housing Was The Economy
No Minister
My Opening Statement for the UATX Caplan-Jones Immigration Rematch
Utopia
Woman of the day
Hompaddock
Playing with numbers.
Kiwipolitico
A crime
No Right Turn
Another non-tariff barrier
Offsetting Behaviour
Rugby Premiership Predictions for Round 18
Stats Chat
Budget 2026
NZCPR
UK Conversion Therapy Ban, Digital ID, Rallies, Elections
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
A central banker’s fiction
Croaking Cassandra
THE WORKING FROM HOME RACKET BY PUBLIC SERVANTS
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Get Vaccinated Tomorrow Or Shut Your Pie Hole
Cactus Kate
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker

[email protected]

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2026 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d