Sources revealed the decision to Salient last week. The report had not been officially released at the time of print.
McCaffrey complained because of irregularities between online and paper ballots, and lax identification procedures with paper votes.
Upon receiving the complaint the election committee released a statement saying the irregularities’ while “not strictly in accordance with the VUWSA constitution” had “minimal” influence on the by-election.
The matter was passed onto an independent panel, comprised of former NZUSA president Joey Randall, former VUWSA Treasurer Graeme Edgeler and Senior Lecturer in Statistics Dr Richard Arnold, who have reportedly found the by-election to be invalid.
I am not surprised. In fact I was amazed that the election committee upheld the by-election. Not only were the electronic ballot papers in breach of the constitution by offering a no confidence option when it should not, you had different ballot papers online and offline. These are not minor issues.
If the election is invalid, the decisions of the VUWSA exec over the past two months may not be legitimate. …
Neilson said the panel’s decision put the exec “in a tight position”. …
“It puts the voting strength on or below six, [which is] what’s required to make quorum,” he said.
Five new executive members—Max Hardy, Caitlin Dunham, Guy Williams, Zachary Dorner and Luke Cao—were elected in the by-election held from July 27 to 29.
What is that old saying about ability to organise a piss up in a brewery? And they get $2 million or so a year in compulsory fees.