Simon Wilson on Labour

Metro Editor Simon Wilson shares his thoughts on in Labour has a future:

Why hasn't the Party championed the Unitary Plan? Because the Party likes it? The Nats like it because they're pragmatists: they know they need a lot more homes built in Auckland or they will lose the city. But Labour should like it because it gives expression to an exciting, future-focused vision of what the city could be.

But that's Labour, struggling for purpose in the modern world. Championing the compact city could have been – and still could be – one way to address that.

The Unitary Plan allows Auckland to grow up and out – not just one of them.

What is the point of Labour? Is it a twentieth century phenomenon sliding into oblivion in the twenty-first?

If you're an urban progressive, the Greens look like a more natural home. If you're worried about modernity in any or all its forms, New Zealand First is ready and waiting. If you're a Māori activist, you can choose from the Māori Party and the Party.

If you're working class? Any of the above, isn't it?

A good summary. And many working class now support National.

Actually, there is a point to Labour and it's a really important one. They're there to win elections. Labour is the main party of opposition and therefore is likely to be the majority party in any centre-left government. So they have to look credible. They have to be credible.

If they're not, the whole centre-left suffers. A vote for the Greens is a vote for a Labour-led government. Votes for and the are also votes for the possibility of such a government.

Yep. The only safe votes for a National-led Government is National, ACT and United Future.

In New Zealand, it's generally accepted that Labour's main job right now, working with the Greens, is to win the next election.

But it's not obvious this view is shared throughout the , where many people clearly prefer to have a leader they agree with, or feel is “one of us”, rather than a leader with great appeal.

And that, in a nutshell, is the tragedy of the Labour Party. They don't understand the importance of personality. They don't have a leader capable of charm and because they changed the voting rules to get rid of the last one they did have, David Shearer, they don't have the ready means to get another one. It's not that they can't win, but they have made it a lot harder for themselves.

And as UK Labour found out, sacking the leader can result in the leader staying on. The unions made Andrew Little the leader, so why would they remove him?

So, what are the prospects for Labour heading into election year? Andrew Little will remain leader so they have to double down on becoming the voice of the future. That's about policy and articulating a vision. Becoming the champion of the compact city in all its forms – from decent affordable to creating a cycling city – is a heaven-sent opportunity.

Will they grasp it? What's their future if they don't? On the positive side, there's only one John Key. When he retires, National will lose its charm advantage. On the negative side, it's only a matter of time before the Greens find an immensely charismatic leader of their own. When that happens, if Labour hasn't done the same, they really could be annihilated.

Enter Jacinda?

Comments (32)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment