Jones tries to half forestry target

Simon Bridges released:

Regional Development Minister Shane Jones is already backtracking from his promise to plant a billion trees in 10 years, Party Development Spokesperson Simon Bridges says.

“From his statements earlier today it appears he's realised that the pledge of a billion new trees is entirely unachievable and now he's attempting to back away from it,” Mr Bridges says.

“His problem is that the target is recorded unambiguously in both the -New Zealand First coalition agreement and the Speech from the Throne on the new Government's programme.

“Now he wants to count around 50 million trees that are already planted every year, about half of the billion he's committed to over a decade. These are happening regardless of his slush fund or the kind of Government in power.

“So his first action is to cut his target in half. Not exactly impressive.

So much backtracking so early in the life of a Government. It's almost as if they were dishonest with their pledges.

Their pledge of 100 million trees a year equates to 274,000 trees a day. That is 11,400 trees and hour or 190 trees a minute or three trees a second.

The Government has been in office 27 days so they are already 7.4 million trees short of their target!

notes:

Partnership with the private sector is one thing, but misleading the public about the ambition of the policy is another. Because the 50 million trees a year private industry currently plants is almost entirely replanting, replacing trees which they've already cut down. In other words, that's just planting to stand still. Worse, the required replanting rate is going to soar over the next decade, as the forests that were planted in the 1990's are harvested. If private industry wants to avoid deforesting land (and paying the carbon costs for doing so), it will probably end up planting that billion trees itself.

Meanwhile, if we want to get the emissions benefits, we need to plant additional trees, not just replant harvested land. The billion trees policy looked like it was an ambitious target to do this, and bring our emissions under control. Instead, it looks like it is just more bureaucratic fudging, designed to give the impression of action while deliberately avoiding achieving anything substantive.

Comments (110)

Login to comment or vote

Add a Comment