This entry was posted on Monday, November 26th, 2007 at 6:57 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
43 Responses to “The biggest tragedy of the Australian election”
Yes Gillard definetly looks like the stooge put in by the unions as payback for the work during the election. Will be interesting to see how Rudd keeps them at bay. He might have a real fight on his hands. Australia could end up like Auckland City with the nice little christian boy getting sidelined by the devious hard lefty.
The third thing I will do when I become PM is introduce a bill into the house that bans socialists from electioneering, I will also ban all donations from unions unless each and every union member who contributed to the donation has a signed consent form witnessed by his or her great grandparent.
I had thought about introducing another bill that banned the right of opposition parties to attack the govt but it seems I am a bit late with that one.
Actually when you come to think about it, it may just be cheaper to shoot socialists on sight.
“What else was Savage’s socialism but ‘applied Christianity’?”
Actually Tane i would just call it socialism. “Social Justice” is not in the bible, although many christians do not mind welfare that can not be linked to their belief in god. The main message of Jesus (shortened) is: All humans are sinners, and sin must be punished. However luckly ive come here to die for all your sins. In order to repay me all you have to do is acknowledge me as your savior, and recognise that i am the son of godd who died for you. If you do this you will be let into heaven and enternal life. If you fail to do this, despite knowing that i died for you then you have condemned yourself to suffer for your sins.
Lee: The left are actually very generous (with other peoples money).
D4J seriously man you have some serious issues that you need to tend to.
I don’t know what you are meaning with the quote “Bitch just needs a good seeing to’ but that kind of stuff just doesn’t need to be said.
You seem to have issues with anyone who doesn’t share your view and no doubt I will be directed some of your venom. It’s not an entirely bad thing to get pissed off, everyone gets riled up from time to time.
You however get nasty and vitriolic and hardly ever show any pragmatism in your posts. You thread-jack and then have amazing lapses of memory when calling others hypocrites.
Go for a run or something mate, get out from your computer desk and see the sun, maybe when you return you will see the world isn’t as dark as you seem to think.
It must be so easy for you to read every ones comments about you Tane and dismiss them as either sexist, racist, homophobic or feral. First of all homophobic is a grossly misused word. Not only does it have no scientific meaning (as the sufix ‘phobic’ implys) but it is the wrong word to describe how so called ‘homophobes’ feel about homosexuals. They object to them on religious ground mainly, as homosexuality is strictly forbidden in the bible. To imply fear is wrong.
Jeff – Dad is a highly sophistocated piece of performance art. I have heard rumours he lives on arts council grants cunningly disguised as the invalids benefit. You’ll be wanting him to sign printed copies of his feral invective when the truth outs at the next venice biennale.
“I have heard rumours he lives on arts council grants cunningly disguised as the invalids benefit.”
Sorry lickspittle , not truthful but what would I expect when your bush telegraphy consists of torturing a moon bat for info after it has been lightly boiled awhile in the liarbour witches cauldron of deceit !
Arts councils don’t fund middle aged heterosexual’s !
Na, I just think you encourage misogyny to boost your hit count and feed your rabid hoard. Doesn’t it concern you that your posts lead to such outbursts of sexism and racism among your supporters?
Of course, Tane takes no responsibility for his own hate speech either here or on the Sub-Standard, so it would be unreasonable to expect him to take any responsibility for the left-wingnuts he’s quite happy to encourage.
Winston Churchill’s response to the suggestion that Socialism was “applied Christianity”, was to say that in Christianity, “all that is mine is yours”, but in Socialism, “all that is yours is mine”.
In reality, Socialism is inimical to applied christianity. No-one needs bother to look after their neighbour, or their brother, or even their own kids these days. Nanny State will do it, and whats more, the Socialists (at least, the ones running NZ today,) look forward to the day when Nanny State DOES IT ALL and Christianity itself is dead. This isn’t Christianity, this is hell on earth.