Match your views to a US presidential candidate

December 26th, 2007 at 9:03 am by David Farrar

There’s a couple of other websites which do this also, but the matcher at news.com.au seems the best to me as it now only asks you six sets of questions, but it allows you to state how important each set is.

My best match was Rudy followed by Hillary.

Tags:

13 Responses to “Match your views to a US presidential candidate”

  1. Graeme Edgeler (3,289 comments) says:

    What? No Huckabee?

    Got McCain – no surprise there.

    He was born in Mexico? I thought Panama (the Panama Canal Zone, to be precise).

    And can any (other) lawyer out there explain how Article 2, section 1, clause 5 of the US Constitution works? He’s not the first major candidate to seek election having been born outside the US, either (Romney’s father ran, and was born in Mexico).

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. metcalph (1,430 comments) says:

    Winner for me was McCain followed by Rudy. Since a similar site had me for Rudy followed by McCain, it seems to be a dead heat.

    As for the question about Gorden Romney, I think that so long as your parents are US citizens you are natural born but the answer is still uncertain (in other words, Dred Scott (!) gave the definitive answer but since a) nobody would be seen dead citing that case for support and b) it was overruled by the 14th amendment, nobody knows the answer).

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. Andrew W (1,629 comments) says:

    McCain, the born outside the US thing also occurred to me as I was doing the quiz, child of American parents the difference?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. djp (59 comments) says:

    The vote was rigged (no Ron Paul option)!!!

    Also Rudy then Hillary…. I feel sorry for you David (read 1984 again :)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. JC (958 comments) says:

    McCain followed by Rudy. Even though several questions could be ticked as “minimal”, I still think they wasted space and had some potential to skew the results. Also, I felt I knew the candidates too well and thus knew the answers already.. I’m sure that influenced me on the importance of the questions.

    JC

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. Michael Wynd (2 comments) says:

    I had John McCain followed by Mitt Romney which is scary as us evangelicals do not think very much of the Mormons.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. GerryandthePM (328 comments) says:

    Couldn’t complete. I don’t give a stuff about which candidate actors or show ponies support, nor the trivia about what they might or might not have done somewhere along the line (like try to join the marines).

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. Neil (588 comments) says:

    You talk about the born in the USA for president.
    I think the answer lies in the fact that the US had control over the Panama Canal at that stage. They ran the administration and had police control.
    The US relinquished control during the times of the “highly successful” President James Earl Carter Jr, probably 1978-79.
    As far as US citizens, I remember Kenneth Franzheim, ambassador in NZ during the Nixon era, taking his pregnant wife home to have the baby- reason it means he qualifies as US born for the Presidency

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. Graeme Edgeler (3,289 comments) says:

    GerryandthePM – try this one:

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/candidate-match-game.htm

    It avoids really shallow questions, and also allows you to rate the importance of the different issues.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. magicmerl (3 comments) says:

    Got Al Gore, followed by John Edwards.

    Not the typical Kiwiblog poster, methinks :~)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. dad4justice (8,238 comments) says:

    You think right merl , how about doing a magic vanishing act ? We will clap in appreciation . Do you sit on your wand ?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. GPT1 (2,122 comments) says:

    McCain followed by Guiliano. I can cope with that. Hillary Clinton DPF – you bloody liberal!!

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. francis (712 comments) says:

    rudy’s my man.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote