The material the SST pulled
A few people would have seen stories about pages being ripped out of the SST magazine Sunday, because of the editor’s letter from Emily Simpson. So what was it that is so bad?
All Emily did was quote a few lines from sex blogger – Always Aroused Girl. She even asterisked out the really naughty words, but did leave in scream, ecstasy and spit. Oh dear – the horrors.
The deleted editor’s letter is here. Can’t say it seems too over the top for me, but I guess the SST were more worried about a commercial backlash.
Hat Tip: Editor’s Weblog
No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
Tags: censorship, Emily Simpson, Media, SST
April 18th, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Perhaps they are worried the third to last paragraph might be viewed by the Press Council as an inaccurate portrayal of the effect of the Electoral Finance Act on free speech?
April 18th, 2008 at 2:50 pm
What a disgusting depraved hussy
Mother of Seven
Remuera
April 18th, 2008 at 2:53 pm
To be honest I didn’t realise the SST magazine had or needed an editorial!
April 18th, 2008 at 3:09 pm
DPF: “The deleted editor’s letter is here. Can’t say it seems too over the top for me,…”
Perhaps you’d care to fill in some of the blanks for the edification of your readership then?
I second Masterley’s sentiment.
April 18th, 2008 at 3:20 pm
DPf maybe you could award a chockie fish for the first correct completed entry
April 18th, 2008 at 3:34 pm
“But it also could have been that 48 hours earlier, two friends held my legs spread wide while a third made me scream with the application of a vibe to my clit, a dong in my pussy and another one in my ass. I screamed around the cock of one of the men holding me down; I spit him out each time I needed to come.
I spit him out quite a lot. Somehow, he didn’t seem much to mind.”
http://aagblog.com/2008/02/28/overripe-tomato/
April 18th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
Well David the delicate darlings who read the dead tree media are a little more sensitive than you.
I’d neve use words like fuck, shit, wank, cunt, Cullen or asshole in a letter to the editor.
April 18th, 2008 at 3:57 pm
Chris, Is that all? I thought the blanked out bits were to with climate change denial!
April 18th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
Some friends, making her scream like that!
April 18th, 2008 at 4:06 pm
I think it’s very progressive of the SST to pay their columnists to surf porn.
April 18th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
…Bless her! (DPF, Any chance you have her phone number??)
April 18th, 2008 at 4:25 pm
Any chance that her friends are cops?
April 18th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Murray: “I’d neve use words like fuck, shit, wank, cunt, Cullen or asshole in a letter to the editor.”
Don’t they all mean the same thing?
April 18th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
i get it sex has been invented recently and you can make money by posting your sluttey life, umm i have a old book called My Secret Life , now thats interesting in the 18th centary,they had sex , (i thought it(sex) was banned after helen davis came to power) thats why we import asians as sex for kids is banned , but full steam ahead for abortions, no need for asians if we had kids, allowed to be born
April 18th, 2008 at 5:00 pm
She is obviously a member of the DAFT Party. I mean, she’s already into the PENIS and the STD.
April 18th, 2008 at 5:01 pm
and on a more serious note, HTFU Sunday Star Times, and what alex masterley said at 2.53pm
April 18th, 2008 at 6:43 pm
It’s not so much what she was describing, it’s just that it’d encourage people to breach the provisions of the shortly-to-be-introduced EFB (Elective F___ing Bill) which makes such acts illegal between two or more people unless the participants have first registered and provided their full names and residential addresses to the appropriate authorities.
A special Commission will consider vital issues such as length and depth as well as the use of any inflatable devices and issue individual rulings, but only after said acts have been consummated. Flirtatious emails, letters, chit chat and glances will only be permitted if they are found not to be explicitly encouraging the recipients to have sex with a particular party. Thus generalised encouragement to debauchery will be legal, whilst special patrols from the Department of Labour (since they clearly have nothing better to do) will be sent out in the lead-up to Valentines Day to ensure that all suggestive cards, genital-shaped chocolate cakes and the like comply with the regulations.
Participants who are duly licensed will have to comply with applicable by-laws including those covering noise and litter (spitting, for instance, will no longer be permitted). They will be required to display their name and residential address to all those participating (marker pens are acceptable, but not on any body parts which may expand or shrink during the course of the permitted activity). Those intending to film their activity for later broadcast on the Internet are required to tattoo their buttocks. It’s understood David Benson-Pope has moved an amendment to this provision, however, on the grounds that swelling may make the identification unreadable.
MPs have been assured that they alone will be exempt, as the law acknowledges the longstanding informal rule that they’re all a pack of c___s to begin with. Some MPs remain uncertain, however, claiming that they are in fact dicks and may thus fall outside the exemption. They’ve been placated, however, by Annette King, who has already invoked the “common sense” rule, saying “I’m fairly common, and as a rule I have absolutely no sense”.
Naturally, solo masturbatory acts will remain unrestricted, so as to not interfere with the making of speeches during election time or the issue of press statements by Peter Dunne.
April 18th, 2008 at 7:27 pm
Well, I think Emily Simpson had a fair point. This “Always Aroused Girl” seems to be gratuitously misusing the word “always.” Kudos to AAG for pointing out to her readers the eventually-inevitable health downsides of multiple cocks in your orifices, though.
April 18th, 2008 at 7:48 pm
Come on guys it’s not hard to work out, two friends and a third….
tongue/mouth, clit, cock, fanny, mouth. – How hard can it be to work that out, it’s excellent editing, enough is still obvious. Bad luck with her infection. Still bladder infections can happen even with monogamous people so for any who criticise her lifestyle – harden up it’s how she likes to live her life.
April 18th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
PS RICO our new virgin my dog hasnt had SEX yet , would the subject of this pathetic discusion like sex with a black and white dog, south american breed LATINO, thats all going for him ONLY a dick thats all , are sluts who post their fucks modest, um is the pope a german, will i win lotto this weekend., DOES DAVID FARRAR LOVE HIS POSTERS, is there life with demerites
April 18th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
Fucken demerits give me the shits just like this stupid nymphomaniac.
April 18th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
D4J
Get a grip closed minded old boy, tell me you wouldn’t like to have sex with a woman that knows what she likes and will give back as good as she gets? Nobody said you had to live with her.
edit: Ooops I think I just worked it out, D4J is all homophobic that the scene depicts more than one man naked in the room at the same time…..
April 18th, 2008 at 11:35 pm
DAvid, this link is getting just a tad out of control… not your usual style. There are plenty of Smut sites on the internet if you want to read this CRAP. HOW ABOUT SOME EDITORIAL CONTROL???
April 18th, 2008 at 11:53 pm
1/ Sex blogs – yawn
just self serving bullshit from people desperate for attention
porn good, sex blogs bad
2/ “Any chance that her friends are cops?”
Thats got to be the comment of the year
April 19th, 2008 at 12:29 am
JSF2008
Walter, online.
http://www.my-secret-life.com/index.php
April 19th, 2008 at 6:39 am
“D4J is all homophobic” What a turd tapping comment !!