Police pay

June 21st, 2012 at 12:00 pm by David Farrar

The Herald reports:

Frontline police staff will not have their pay cut in talks due to resume this week, but are facing a pay freeze because of a tight policing budget.

Police Commissioner Peter Marshall could not confirm yesterday whether sworn police officers would get a raise in pay negotiations which are being held with unions.

I do wish the full facts would be presented. The Police Commissioner can not just refuse a pay raise. He can make an offer, which the union can accept or reject. The union can make a claim, which the Commissioner can accept or reject. If they can not agree, their the final offer and claim go to a three person independent arbitration panel, which will decide to either accept the Commissioner’s offer in its totality or the union’s claim in its totality.

Police have predicted that a 3 per cent wage increase would cost $75 million a year and CSI increases would cost $42.5 million a year.

That’s a strange figure. If a 3% wage increase would cost $75 million a year, then that means the current wage bill is $2.5b a year.  As their total operating costs are $1.48b a year, that figure must be wrong.

Also with 9,000 Police officers a claim that a 3% wage increase would cost $75m a year means each officer would get a pay rise of $8,300 or so. For that to be 3%, it means the average pay rate would be $275,000 a year approx.

Tags:

6 Responses to “Police pay”

  1. Harriet (1,825) Says:

    I thought the fraud squad took a dim view of dishonesty ?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. Spoon (96) Says:

    Perhaps they mean a real increase of 3%. If they’re using slightly old figures for annual inflation it still includes the GST increase putting it at close to 5%. A net 8% increase probably lines up with your figures more closely?

    Still would be nice to have the real figures used…

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. lastmanstanding (1,038) Says:

    If we assume the average pay for 9000 police is $65K then the total is $585Million. 3% is $17.5Million. Looks like someone cant add or multiply.

    Mind you as an oldie who one of the last to be taught proper the standard of reading writing and arithmetic is pathetic.

    And the biggest joke is teachers who cant teaching pupils who cant. Blind leading blind

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. cha (2,354) Says:

    Mind you as an oldie who one of the last to be taught proper the standard of reading writing and arithmetic is pathetic

    Muphry’s law strikes.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. Viking2 (9,499) Says:

    and Corrections are shedding 130 staff at $76k saving for each.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. JohnM (6) Says:

    $75m figure can make sense if it refers to the cost of a 3% increase PLUS the automatic “career service increment” based on time-served. If the CSI alone is $42m, then 3%=33m or so – which is right as their total wage bill is just over $1b, and means an average total rem of just under $90k, which is about right. Assumes it applies to all 12000 staff, not just the 9000 sworn officers.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.