UK cable on Tiananmen Square Massacre

A fascinating UK cable on what happened at Tiananmen Square. Some extracts:

THE ARMY THAT HAS COMMITTED THE ATROCITIES IN BEIJING IS 27 ARMY WHO ARE TROOPS FROM SHANXI PROVINCE (?), ARE 60 PERCENT ILLITERATE AND ARE CALLED PRIMITIVES. THE COMMANDER OF 27 ARMY WAS YANG ZHENHUA, SON OF YANG BAIDING BROTHER OF YANG SHANGKUN. THEY WERE KEPT WITHOUT NEWS FOR TEN DAYS AND TOLD THEY WERE TO TAKE PART IN AN EXERCISE. A TV FILM WOULD BE MADE OF THE EXERCISE WHICH PLEASED THEM. THEY WERE INFORMED OF MARTIAL LAW ON MAY 20. FOR THE FIRST 4 DAYS AFTER ARRIVAL THEY WERE DRIVEN AROUND BEIJING CITY TO FAMILIARISE THEM WITH THE AREA. 27 ARMY ARE AT FULL STRENGTH WITH THEIR OWN TANKS AND APCS AND A FULL OUTFIT OF AMMUNITION, TEAR GAS AND FLAMETHROWERS. OTHER ARMIES ARE ONLY AT 1 DIVISION STRENGTH. THE LEADERSHIP KEEPS 27 ARMY ON THE MOVE SO THAT IT CAN ATTACK FROM A DIFFERENT DIRECTION EACH TIME.
3. FACT. ON THE NIGHT OF 3/4 JUNE 27 ARMY WAS TO ATTACK FROM THE WEST WITH OTHER UNITS FROM SHENYANG MR. THE PLAN WAS THAT THE FIRST WAVE (SMR) WOULD ATTACK WITH NO WEAPONS. THE SECOND WAVE (SMR) WOULD ATTACK WITH WEAPONS BUT NO AMMUNITION. THE THIRD WAVE (SMR) WOULD ATTACK AS FOR SECOND WAVE BUT OFFICERS WOULD HAVE LOADED SIDE ARMS TO FRIGHTEN THE CROWD. THE FOURTH WAVE WOULD BE 27 ARMY WITH FULL EQUIPMENT AND AMMUNITION. THE FIRST ATTACKS OCCURRED AT MUCIDI AND SHILIPU. THE FIRST THREE WAVES WERE HELD BY THE DEMONSTRATORS AND SMR TROOPS TRIED TO PUSH BACK THE CROWDS TO LET 27 ARMY THROUGH. THEY FAILED AND 27 ARMY APCS OPENED FIRE ON THE CROWD (BOTH CIVILIANS AND SOLDIERS) BEFORE RUNNING OVER THEM IN THEIR APCS.
4. FACT. THE ENRAGED MASSES FOLLOWED IGNORING M/G FIRE TO NEXT BATTLE AT LIUBUKOU. APCS RAN OVER TROOPS AND CIVILIANS AT 65KPH IN SAME MANNER. ONE APC CRASHED AND DRIVER (A CAPTAIN) GOT OUT AND WAS TAKEN BY CROWD TO HOSPITAL. HE IS NOT DERANGED AND DEMANDS DEATH FOR HIS ATROCITIES.
5. FACT. ON ARRIVAL AT TIANANMEN TROOPS FROM SMR HAD SEPARATED STUDENTS AND RESIDENTS. STUDENTS UNDERSTOOD THEY WERE GIVEN ONE HOUR TO LEAVE SQUARE BUT AFTER FIVE MINUTES APCS ATTACKED. STUDENTS LINKED ARMS BUT WERE MOWN DOWN INCLUDING SOLDIERS. APCS THEN RAN OVER BODIES TIME AND TIME AGAIN TO MAKE QUOTE PIE UNQUOTE AND REMAINS COLLECTED BY BULLDOZER. REMAINS INCINERATED AND THEN HOSED DOWN DRAINS.

Such barbarity.

Law change needed

Newshub reports:

The family of a woman killed by her partner and left in a Waikato lake for almost a year have spoken out about what they describe as New Zealand’s broken justice system.
Now they are fighting for law reform to restrict the rights of murderers and to prevent them from placing a financial burden on the families of their victims.

In July 2016, 42-year-old Kim Richmond disappeared. It took 11 months for her body to be found submerged in a ute at Lake Arapuni.
“I never get to see my sister again, the children never get to see their mum,” her sister Tracey says.
And with that came another shock – the man accused of killing her was her partner of 26 years and the father of her children, Cory Jefferies.
After Jefferies was arrested, Kim’s parents took temporary custody of their grandchildren – two boys and a girl now aged 11, 14 and 16.
A year later, as soon as the verdict came in, they applied to be the children’s legal guardians. The family thought it was the end of the nightmare.
But from behind bars Kim’s killer has repeatedly delayed the custody process trying to stop their application. …

Tracey desperately wants for some good to come from Kim’s death and she’s calling for urgent law reform to limit the rights of a prisoner in a custody battle like this one and for the financial burden to always be put on the killer.

That seems like a very reasonable law change. If you kill the other parent, you lose any rights of custody.

Journalist fails Economics 101

Glenn McConnell writes:

You can’t get on board the Northern Explorer or TranzAlpine for under $99. Tickets generally cost between $119 and $219. You can’t even get on the Coastal Pacific, between Picton and Christchurch, which is booked out almost every day.
KiwiRail’s pricing is obscene.
It’s a great journey, yes, but why does it cost so much? Most days you can fly Wellington to Auckland for $49 on Air New Zealand.

McConnell seems to not understand costs or revenue.

First on the costs side, a one hour plane trip has different costs to a 12 hour train trip. Costs determine what you need to charge to at least break even. Air NZ makes money on their trips. I suspect Kiwirail loses money on their trips.

On the revenue side, only some tickets are available for $49. Many tickets between Auckland and Wellington cost $300. As the marginal cost of an extra passenger is below $49, Air NZ lets some tickets go for $49. But they would lose money if all tickets were $49.

Trains can take an almost endless number of people. Add on another carriage, hire a few more train guards and go.

McConnell seems to think carriages are free In fact they are around $3 million. So to justify a new carriage you would need to be generating around $250,000 a year of revenue from that carriage. Oh plus extra operating costs.

The only forseeable reason KiwiRail has decided to set its price so high is to remain exclusive. It’s expensive for the sake of it. The people at the state-run rail company have made a decision to price New Zealanders off our trains.

It despairs me that a journalist is so limited in thinking that they say there is only one possible reason for a pricing decision, and worse of all it is an illogical decision “for the sake of it”. Not that the price is set to cover costs.

Why we need an independent inquiry into the hacking claims

The Press editorial:

More than a week has passed since Finance Minister Grant Robertson issued one of the most remarkable statements in recent New Zealand politics. It came just 16 minutes after an alarming media release from the Treasury claimed its “systems [had] been deliberately and systematically hacked”. A hack sounded bad, but Robertson went even further
Although the context was National’s dramatic release of Budget information earlier that day – information we now know was sourced through good old-fashioned Google searches rather than dastardly hacking – the Treasury did not name a likely culprit. Robertson moved closer to joining the dots when he said “we have contacted the National Party tonight to request that they do not release any further material, given that the Treasury said they have sufficient evidence that indicates the material is a result of a systematic hack and is now subject to a Police investigation”.

It is important to note that Robertson did explicitly link National to the claimed criminal activity.

Did Makhlouf deliberately mislead the Finance Minister before they both issued statements about the “hack”? Did Makhlouf waste police time? Did he knowingly mislead the public with his analogy about the site being like a locked room where the bolt has been broken? Did he politicise a position and a department that should always be rigorously neutral when he allowed Robertson to connect National to a fictitious hack? 

The answer appears to be yes to all four questions, but the SSC inquiry needs to determine this.

The inquiry has to be both fast and thorough. For his own sake and ours, Makhlouf will need to assure Deputy State Services Commissioner John Ombler​ he acted in good faith. Robertson, on the other hand, is sure to be feeling relieved that the State Services Commission does not have the remit to investigate ministers.

And this is why we need a full independent inquiry. Regardless of the role Malhlouf played, it is inconceivable that Ministers were not aware well before Thursday that there had been no hack – yet they said nothing and Robertson did not retract his statement.

The SSC inquiry is an internal one, by a Deputy SSC. It has no powers and no remit to look at anyone beyond the Treasury Secretary.

If the Government has nothing to hide, it should appoint a QC to do a full independent inquiry which includes actions of Ministers, ministerial staff and all agencies.

Unless one thinks there is nothing wrong with accusing the opposition of criminal activity because a parliamentary secretary used the Treasury search engine.

The sense of entitlement

Stuff reports:

Fleischer and Cable Car chairman Anthony Wilson have asked a council committee to look at scrapping SuperGold card coverage on the service.
Grey Power President Mac Welch said if Wellington City Council wanted a fight over free cable-car rides they could “bring it on”. 
“The fact that we worked seven days a week, brought up families, didn’t wine and dine and have mobile phones and flash motorcars, bought one house, stayed in it forever, and paid a mortgage – when these people start whingeing about things like that it’s high time somebody got a kick in the arse quite frankly.”

The sense of entitlement is dripping from Mr Welch.

He thinks he should get free cable car rides because he had a job, raised a family and didn’t have a mobile phone. Oh diddums.

Guest Post: The Greatest Ever Armada

A guest post by David Garrett:

75 years ago, on the morning of 6 June 1944, the greatest armada the world has ever seen crossed the English Channel to begin the long awaited invasion of Nazi occupied Europe. Films like Saving Private Ryan give the false impression that it was an entirely American “show”; in fact there were more British  and Canadian troops (83,000) than American (73,000) attempting to land that day. The invasion on 6 June – already postponed twice due to weather – was the last available “window” where tides and phases of the moon were favourable in the first half of June. If the invasion could not proceed then it would have  had to be postponed for at least two weeks – two more weeks during  which in one way or another, the invasion plans could leak or be discovered.
 
The operation was preceded by arguably the greatest – and certainly the largest – military deception operation ever mounted. The Germans knew that the invasion was coming, and there were only two possible sites: in the Pas de Calais – the point on the French coast closest to England – or Normandy, 200 miles to the west.  Hitler was convinced the invasion would be in the Pas de Calais, and remained convinced for many vital weeks afterwards that  Normandy  was a mere diversion, and the real invasion in the Pas de Calais would follow.
 
Because he was so convinced, he resisted all advice to the contrary, chiefly from Field Marshal Rommel, who he had placed in charge of the so called “Alantic Wall” stretching from Norway to the Franco-Spanish border.  Rommel had correctly predicted the Normandy invasion, and when it occurred, urged Hitler to quickly move the 15th Army stationed in the Pas de Calais – including two crack tank divisions –  to Normandy. When Hitler finally acquiesced, it was too late.
 
Operation Fortitude involved the creation of an entirely fictional American Army group, the First US Army Group (FUSAG) supposedly commanded by colourful American general George Patton, who Hitler was known to admire. Most readers will have seen footage of  the inflatable dummy tanks trucks and planes which were collected in FUSAG “bases” in various locations in south eastern England. But  Operation Fortitude consisted of much more than that: dummy wooden invasion barges collected in ports close to the Pas de Calais; thousands of dummy radio  signals between Patton’s headquarters and his entirely imaginary commanders; non-existent trains transporting non-existent troops to the  genuinely heavily guarded non-existent bases.
Fortitude was successful in large part because in the entire war, no German spy  parachuted into or landed in Britain by sea  remained undetected for more than a few days; most were arrested within hours of their arrival. Captured spies were given a stark choice – be “turned” and become double agents, or face execution after a brief perfunctory trial. Most chose the first option; a brave dozen or so chose death instead of betrayal. But back to Normandy.
 
There were five invasion beaches: Utah and Omaha were targeted by the Americans, while Gold Juno and Sword were the destination of the British and Canadians. The invasion – which began at 0600 hours on 6 June – was preceded by the dropping of 24,000 US, British and Canadian troops behind the heavily defended coast. It was their task to take  vital bridges and road junctions, and in concert with the activated French Resistance, to blow up others in order to impede German reinforcement.
 
One lesser known parachute  “force” dropped in the night and morning of 5/6 of June was 500 dummy parachutists known as “Ruperts” –  figures made of a canvas “uniform” filled with sand and straw.  The Ruperts were dropped well away from the landing grounds to be used by the real paratroops, and were supposed to explode on landing to disguise their fraudulent nature, and mislead the Germans about the number and locations of paratroops  dropping  when the real invasion began  some hours later.
 
While the British and Canadians at Gold Juno and Sword suffered only relatively light casualties, as Private Ryan  and the much earlier movie The Longest Day show, it was a rather different story at Utah and Omaha beaches, particularly Omaha, where winds and currents blew the landing craft to the west where the invaders had to deal with unexpected high cliffs (Saving Private Ryan depicts in extremely realistic detail the landing at Omaha Beach. Most of the rest of the movie is fanciful bullshit).  For that reason, American casualties were far greater than the British – although the total of about 10,000 casualties, 4,414 of them confirmed dead, was much less than the Allied planners had anticipated.
 
In addition to the “Ruperts” – the exploding dummy parachutists – there were some other imaginative innovations, including most notably the “Mulberry” harbours made of concrete,  towed from Britain and then sunk at Omaha and Gold beaches to provide  instant ports until actual ports could be recaptured. Although the Mulberry at Omaha beach was largely destroyed in a savage storm on 19 June, and thereafter abandoned, the Mulberry at Gold Beach was used for ten months, and during that time 2.5 million men, 500,000 vehicles and 4 million tons of supplies  were successfully disembarked across it before it was finally decommissioned.
 
Another rather  less successful innovation was PLUTO, or Pipeline Under The Ocean, a flexible pipeline  laid from British channel ports to the invasion beaches, through which petrol and diesel was to be pumped to fuel the voracious appetite of the tanks and  trucks  forming part of the invasion force.  Originally conceived by an Anglo-Iranian (later BP) oil company engineer, the Battle for Normandy was won without a single drop of fuel being delivered by  PLUTO, and by VE day almost a year later, only 8% of the fuel sent to fuel the invasion and subsequent battle  was delivered through PLUTO.
 
While Germans failed to throw the Allies back into the sea, by the end of the first day only Gold and Sword beaches had linked up, and none of the Allied objectives for D-Day  were achieved. All of the five beaches were not linked until 12 June, and the town of Caen – a first day objective – was not finally  taken until 21 July 1944. In the end, as Rommel had predicted, if the Germans could not throw the invaders back into the sea within 24 hours, the Battle for Normandy would be lost, as would the war itself, although that result would not be achieved for almost another year of bloody fighting.
 
The average age of troops landing on that day 75 years ago was 20 – so the survivors are all very old men; sadly none of them will still be alive 25 years hence, when the centenary of the battle will hopefully be celebrated as one of the greatest days in modern history, and another of the many achievements of what the Americans call the “golden generation”.
 
 What is the significance of D Day today? It is proper to recognise that the British and Americans didn’t win the war themselves; had Normandy not happened, the Russian juggernaut then slowly advancing on Germany from the East would eventually have controlled all of Western Europe, certainly to the Spanish border and perhaps beyond. Thus in a very real sense, D Day can be said to have shaped the post-war borders of Europe, many of which continue to exist today. D Day and the battle of Normandy which followed are certainly military triumphs on a par with the defeat by the British of the Spanish Armada, and of Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo.
 
Dedication:  This piece is dedicated to the memory of my dear friend the late Herbert Perry who, at the age of 23,  was the Chief Engineer of an LST (Landing Ship Tank) on D-Day, and whose name my son proudly bears.
 

The truth about the 17 year old girl and euthanasia

So the 17 year old rape victim was refused assisted dying or euthanasia. What has happened is she is starving herself to death instead. Incredibly sad what she has had to endure.

Why not just have a maximum speed limit of 20 km/hr?

Stuff reports:

Reducing speed limits on open roads and urban streets could do more harm than good and actually make them less safe for users, motoring group the AA believes.
Long-term road safety data from NZ Transport Agency’s (NZTA) MegaMaps tool suggests speed limits on almost 90 per cent of the country’s roads are too high and should be drastically reduced.
It also suggests cutting limits to between 60kmh and 80kmh on most open roads would improve safety, and that only 5 per cent should retain the current 100kmh limit, the NZ Herald reported.
Reducing limits in towns and cities to 30kmh to 40kmh would also have safety benefits, NZTA suggested.

Of course reducing speed limits reduces accidents. Just as closing down workplaces would reduce workplace accidents. But the questions should be, what is the trade off.

If the open speed limit was 60 km/hr how many more hours would people spend in traffic? How much more expensive would it be to devliver goods for export?

Reshuffle predictions

Jamie Ensor at Newshub writes:

While Ardern said no substantive changes are in the works, there will be some movement, says Tova O’Brien.
“The predictions are sound in terms of Kris Faafoi – he is definitely the favourite to get a spot in Cabinet,” O’Brien told The AM Show.

If Faafoi does not get promoted to Cabinet, then the only conclusion must be there is a ban on men being promoted. He has clearly performed well enough to be there. He is performing better than many front benchers.

O’Brien said Whaitiri could also be back in some role, after strong support from some colleagues.

Less so from her staff. Good example to set for employers that assaulting staff only requires a temporary demotion.

The future isn’t clear for Phil Twyford, the Minister of Housing and Urban Development, and Minister of Transport.
O’Brien said the KiwiBuild programme, intended to build 100,000 homes in 10 years, that he oversees, has been a “humiliating destruction”.
While the first annual target for KiwiBuild was originally 1000 homes, in January, Twyford said only 300 would be done by the July 1 deadline. But in May, the Government couldn’t say how many houses would end up done by then.

On June 5, the KiwiBuild website said 102 houses had been completed.

To make their election promise they need to build a house ever 2,400 seconds by 30 June. That is including nights and weekends. If you assume there is no building at midnight or at weekends, then that is a house every 570 working seconds.

“There is also a spectre of an axe still hanging over Iain Lees-Galloway, the Immigration Minister, after the Karel Sroubek debacle last year.”

I would be surprised if he got moved.

Offensive humour has a place

Stuff reports:

A show airing on Netflix has drawn the ire of Australian Holocaust survivors after a recent episode made distasteful jokes about Anne Frank and Adolf Hitler.
Historical Roasts, a series by US stand-up comic Jeff Ross, was released last month and is currently available on the global streaming service.
In each episode, cast members – mostly comedians – dress up as real-life historical figures such as Abraham Lincoln, Freddie Mercury and Cleopatra, and go on stage to exchange insults with others who are also in character.
One episode, written and performed entirely by Jewish people and featuring actors portraying Anne and Hitler, crosses the line, says a group of Melbourne-based Holocaust survivors.

The skit includes jokes such as Hitler’s character telling Anne’s: “Everyone knows you as a hero and best-selling author, but to me, you’ll always be little number 825060”.

I’m okay with this. Sure it is offensive to some or even many, but humour has its place, even with terrible events.

Mark Baker, an associate professor at Monash University who has written a book on his parent’s experience with the Holocaust, said that while he didn’t want to defend the quality of the Netflix series, there has been a “long tradition” of Holocaust humour both during and after the genocide.
“It’s a tool of survival,” he said. “To laugh is to be human and in a situation where the Nazis tried to rob Jews of their humanity, humour resisted their dehumanisation. That’s why you’ll find an impulse to laugh about atrocity in all cultures.”

Well said.

Dr Baker said there was a “fine line” between subverting Nazi ideology and trivialising genocide and anti-Semitism.
“What matters is intent,” he said. “What makes the Anne Frank episode challenging is that the humour is being directed not only at the perpetrators but at the victim – someone who has become a universal symbol of adolescent innocence.”

I think it is clear the intent is not anti-Semitic.

SSC launches investigation of Treasury Secretary

Radio NZ reports:

A statement from Commissioner Peter Hughes this afternoon said the investigation would establish the facts about Mr Makhlouf’s public statements about the unauthorised access to Budget documents, his advice to the Finance Minister, his basis for them and his decision to refer the matter to police.
The questions raised were a “matter of considerable public interest and should be addressed,” Mr Hughes said.

It is good there is an independent investigation. There seems no doubt that the public were misled, and Ministers may have been misled also.

However it might be that the fault doesn’t lie so much with Malhlouf, but with those who advised him. The inquiry needs to establish who knew what when.

There is another aspect to this which also needs some clarity. That is when were Ministers informed that the information put out by Treasury was incorrect?

We now know that the GCSB did not regard Treasury as having been hacked. When Treasury then put out a release saying they had been hacked, surely GCSB informed one or more Ministers (or at least DPMC) that this information was incorrect.

Could you imagine the GCSB saying nothing for 48 hours while stories around the world were proclaiming the NZ Treasury had been hacked?

Treasury did not correct the record until 5 am Thursday. But when did Ministers get informed the statement was incorrect, and why did they allow the misinformation to persist?

Politik tells us:

This whole affair now centres on one critical meeting or conversation; between Makhlouf, Robertson and Ardern’s Deputy Chief of Staff and Chief Press Secretary around 7.00 p.m. last Tuesday night.
After that meeting, Makhlouf issued a statement saying that Treasury had been subject to a systematic and deliberate hack and then 17 minutes later, Robertson went one step further and linked the National Party to the hack.

What was said in this meeting. Did Robertson and the PMO really ask no questions about the basis for the claim of being hacked? And when did Ministers learn there was no hack? It almost certainly was well before 5 am Thursday. It may have even been Tuesday evening. Yet they said nothing.

Digital Services Tax options

The Herald reports:

Internet giants like Google and Facebook could soon be paying more tax in New Zealand as the Government moves to take submissions on a “digital services tax”.
A digital services tax would apply to digital revenues created in New Zealand, whether that be through social media platforms, content sharing sites like YouTube, companies advertising online and e-commerce sites that facilitate the sales of goods and services such as Airbnb, Uber and eBay.
In February Cabinet agreed to investigate a new tax on multinational companies targeting digital revenues. Today, Finance Minister Grant Robertson and Revenue Minister Stuart Nash have announced two proposed options to ensure offshore technology companies no longer enjoy tax breaks.
Government is proposing to change the current international income tax rules to allow more taxation in market countries. A similar option is currently being discussed by the OECD and the G20 group of economies.

The second option is to apply a digital services tax of three per cent to revenues earned by highly digitalised multinationals operating in New Zealand.

A 3% tax on revenue is a very bad idea. It is arbitrary and will probably breach some of our tax treaties.

Think if Xero got whacked by a 3% revenue tax by the UK, because it has UK customers. Xero went many years not making a profit as it was growing the company. A 3% revenue tax may have crippled it.

Auckland Council want to make housing massively more expensive

Stuff reports:

A move to make all new homes more accessible for people with mobility needs has been put forward to the Government.
Auckland Council’s governing body approved a submission last week calling for universal design standards for residential buildings.
Universal design refers to the design of buildings to make them accessible to all people regardless of age, disability or other factors. 
Currently, only commercial properties must adhere to the rules but the council wants that expanded to include homes.

The cost of them could be massive, and do very little to help with disabled access.

Commercial buildings are by their nature open to either the public or the staff who work there. They should have (for example) lifts and ramps so people in wheelchairs can shop there or work there.

But your private home is for you and your family. Why should you be forced to design your home for anyone but yourself?

Families come in all sizes. Some homes are good for toddlers and some are not. Some homes are good for elderly people, and some are not. People choose a home that suits them.

Requiring every single house built in New Zealand to be (for example) wheelchair friendly would drive up the costs of homes by tens of thousands of dollars.

Fundamentally a private home is very different to a commercial building.

Hosking thinks we may end up in deficit

Mike Hosking writes:

Already the doubts over what Grant Robertson was telling us last Friday are spreading.
If you missed it last week, what I was trying to explain to him (and he wasn’t accepting) is that he is running his books dangerously close to the margin, that the forecasts are optimistic, and that it would take next to nothing for them to be out – and his $1.3 billion surplus would be gone.
His defence was that the Treasury are good at forecasting. No, they are not.

By the end of the week, as he presented his numbers and arguments at the business breakfasts to the economists, they were saying exactly what we are. His forecasts are optimistic, if not delusional.
If you want proof, this is how marginal it all is. The Budget has $168 million for the gun buyback scheme, the gun lobby think it’ll be closer to a billion. Robertson says if they’re right, they’ll cover it.
My question is with what? If it’s a billion, they have under-budgeted by $850 million. The surplus at $1.3 billion, minus $850 million, is less than half a billion. And in terms of the size of the economy it’s literally pocket change.

The $1.3 billion surplus is very tight. It could disappear either through lower economic growth and hence tax take or higher spending than budgeted.

The stand off with teachers over their pay claims has to be resolved eventually and that could really hit the bottom line.

Gareth Morgan on TOP

Radio NZ reports:

Gareth Morgan is in the Mongolian mountains on a three-month motorcycle tour of east Asia, and the emails he fires off certainly capture a man in the midst of an adrenaline rush.
“A group of grovelling, compromising political aspirants,” he types when asked what he thinks of his former colleagues in The Opportunities Party. They lack “talent in the ranks” he spits, before he straps on his helmet and hits the next apex.

Guess he won’t be donating again!

In July 2018, The Opportunities Party announced it wouldn’t contest the 2020 election, then a month later, it announced it would. Simmons was elected leader, despite Morgan publicly backing another candidate. Morgan resigned his final positions at TOP in March this year, and said he wouldn’t give the party any more money.
Asked whether he still doubts Simmons is the right person for the job, Morgan doesn’t mince his words. He says he’s contemptuous of parties that “hang around like bad smells,” as they end up compromising their principles.
“This is where I differ very starkly from the Kumbaya crowd that Geoff Simmons has assembled. They’re little more than a cargo cult clinging on to the goodwill that TOP: 2017 created with voters.”

What’s remarkable about this fallout is Simmons was one of the people closest to Morgan and had worked for him for many years.

Our low growth is not due to external factors

Liam Dann writes:

When the Government acknowledges the slowing of New Zealand GDP growth, it is to global risk it prefers to point.
In fact in her pre-Budget speech to Business NZ, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was happy to throw European uncertainty and the UK’s Brexit turmoil into the mix.
That’s politics I guess.
But in fact, New Zealand currently appears to be a net beneficiary of global economic events.
Export prices for New Zealand commodities have remained very strong.
In March, New Zealand exports rose $899 million (19 per cent) to reach $5.7 billion – a new record for any month ever.
In the year to April 2019, annual goods exports to China increased $2.7 billion (22 per cent) from the April 2018 year to reach $15 billion for the first time ever.

So blaming Europe for our low growth is silly.

So why not acknowledge why it is really happening?
The housing market is headed into a cyclical slump.
Business is not happy and not investing.
This has all the makings of a classic kiwi economic cycle.

And if investment stays low, the Government’s surplus may become a deficit.

Individuals carrying the tax burden

Rebecca Stevenson writes at Stuff:

In my working lifetime there is one thing that’s also become a certain – the personal tax rate and take is never lowered.
New Zealand’s top tax rate kicks-in at a measly $70,000.

Yep, you’ve slogged your guts out, managed to move on from the 50s and eked your way up through the 60s only to hit $70,000 and boom.

This is how the Government gets to spend so much money – the stealth tax increase where your tax increases as your pay increases, even if the pay rise is just keeping pace with inflation.

In 2008, only 335,000 people paid the top tax rate. By the 2016-2017 tax year it had almost doubled to 665,000 people.

And it will keep increasing.

And now, people earning over $70,000 pay 63 per cent of all income tax.

Rich pricks!

And if you push the numbers out further, from 2018 to 2023, revenue from personal taxation is projected to grow from $36 billion to $48 billion (an increase of 35 per cent) representing 43 percent of all total sovereign revenue.

We should be reducing the tax burden on individuals.

The QB Honours List 2019

From DPMC:

DNZM
To be Dames Companion of the said Order:
Dr Susan Nicola Bagshaw, CNZM, of Christchurch. For services to youth health.
Mrs Yvette Winifred Corlett, CNZM, MBE, of Auckland. For services to athletics.
Deceased. Her Majesty’s approval of this award took effect on 12 April 2019, prior to the date of decease.
Mrs Areta Koopu, CBE, of Auckland. For services to Māori and the community.
Ms Frances Rosemary Walsh, MNZM, of Wellington. For services to film.
KNZM
To be Knights Companion of the said Order:
Mr Paul Hunter Adams, CNZM, of Tauranga. For services to philanthropy and the community.
Mr Roger Leighton Hall, CNZM, QSO, of Auckland. For services to theatre.
Mr Graham Michael Lowe, ONZM, QSM, of Auckland. For services to youth and education.

Nice to see Yvette Corlett (nee Williams) finally honoured, and also Fran Walsh and Roger Hall who have made exceptional contributions to the arts.

Auckland Transport paying for social media influencers

The Herald reports:

Ratepayers have helped fund Auckland Transport’s $12,000 spend on social media influencers over the past year, a cost that has been labelled a “waste of money” by some.
Influencers like former reality TV star Viarni Bright and Mai FM presenter Lily Taurau have been paid between $1500 and $2500 for their part in a campaign.
Auckland Transport marketing specialist Rob Pitney said payment depended on the individual’s “level of fame” and number of followers on social media accounts like Instagram and Facebook.
“Auckland Transport uses ‘influencers’ as part of our advertising media strategy for a few areas of our business, including AT Metro, cycling and road safety,” he said.
AT would often include “an influencer or two” as part of its digital advertising plan for certain campaigns.
The average cost for a post on Instagram or Facebook was $1000.

And they wonder why they’re unpopular.

Will NZ consumers pay the price for the Amazon tax?

The Herald reports:

Kiwi consumers will miss out on access to more than 400 million products if the Government’s online GST crackdown backfires and Amazon blocks New Zealanders from accessing its services like it has in Australia.
The e-commerce juggernaut is set to ban Australian consumers from using its global websites including its flagship Amazon.com as the Australian Government clamps down on international firms selling low-value goods without filing GST.
From next month, when Australia starts collecting GST on low-value goods, the e-commerce giant will restrict shoppers meaning they will only be able to purchase goods from its local domain, rather than its international sites that sell a far greater variety of products.

If New Zealanders lose access to the main Amazon site, there will be a huge number of very unhappy people.