“Ardern falls short”

Sam Sachdeva at Newsroom writes:

The news that the Government Communications Security Bureau had made representations to ministers about Treasury Secretary Gabriel Makhlouf’s use of the term “hack” came not through any proactive disclosure by the Government, but a story broken by the NZ Herald last Friday, over a week after the Budget itself had been put to bed.
Even then, further details have been only begrudgingly handed out: it took until Monday afternoon for Ardern to state Finance Minister Grant Robertson had not known about the GCSB advice when he issued a media release supporting the Treasury’s claims, and a further 24 hours for the Government to provide a detailed timeline of who was told what, when.
While the new information would seem to clear Robertson of conspiring with Makhlouf to smear National, it doesn’t address why he, Ardern and other ministers failed to set the record straight sooner.

They let the lie remain there for another day and a bit.

Radio NZ also report:

Why the prime minister and Mr Robertson didn’t correct Treasury’s statement alleging a systematic and deliberate hack after the GCSB contacted the Beehive to say no such thing had occured, is one burning question.

And linked to that is this:

However, why Mr Makhlouf then went on Morning Report on Wednesday and carefully and meticilously detailed the seriousness of the hacking in such spectacular fashion is also unanswered.
“Imagine you’ve got a room in which you’ve placed important documents that you feel are secure, which you’ve bolted down, lock and key,” Mr Makhlouf told Morning Report’s Susie Ferguson.
“But unknown to you one of those bolts has a weakness and someone who attacks that bolt, deliberately, persistently, repeatedly, finds that it breaks and they can enter access those papers. That’s what’s happened here.
“It wasn’t an instance of someone stumbling into the room accidentally; it wasn’t an instance of someone attacking the bolt and finding that it broke immediately. It wasn’t someone who tried not once, not twice but in fact over 2000 times to attack that bolt.”
As far as crimes against Treasury go it sounded like a fairly major one from Mr Makhlouf’s account.
But why was he not set straight when the GCSB had already contacted government ministers the night before?
According to the timeline released yesterday, Jacinda Ardern and Mr Robertson were advised roughly 9.50pm and 10.25pm.
It was Mr Robertson who initially agreed to do the RNZ interview after putting out his statement at 8.22pm, but during the course of the night that changed and instead it was suggested Mr Makhlouf front media.

There seem to be only two possible versions of events here.

  1. Robertson did not tell his Treasury Secretary about the GCSB advice, and set Makhlouf up to fail by insisting he does the media, but withheld the GCSB advice from him.
  2. Robertson did tell Makhlouf about the GCSB advice, and Makhlouf ignored it

Guest Post: To Minister Twyford on Western Park Village

A guest post from Alwyn Poole:

After working with John Campbell on the Western Park Village articles this week the most astonishing thing, Minister, is just how much you already knew. Since you became Te Atatu MP in 2008 people like Bernie Smith from Monte Cecilia Housing Trust has more than kept you informed and implored you to help. “Vision West”, and others, have done the same and worked tirelessly for change. You were also well aware of the 2017 article on the place. Then; your admitted that you had been there and talked to the residents (well – according to the law they are only supposed to be temporary residents) and the owners – who admit to raking in $1 million a year of profit from this misery pit. And yet it remains.
I know a little bit about difficult beginnings. My maternal grand-parents had 13 kids and lived in a State House at 13 Lewis Avenue, Aramoho. That house was brick, with a fire-place, 4 bed-rooms, a toilet and bath and they had space outside for a garden and chickens. They were poor (something called the Great Depression did not help) but they had a safe, warm, dry place and a genuine neighbourhood. Those kids, including my mum, had hope and grew-up to live productive lives. It was gradual and even I had to live in a bus in the backyard of a relative while when my parents went through some tough times. I have travelled and seen the trailer parks of Florida and Hurricane damaged New Orleans. My wife and daughter have spent time in Haiti and visiting the tough areas of Las Vegas. None of that prepared me for what I saw in Ranui on Tuesday last week.
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/john-campbell-issued-trespass-notice-while-investigating-caravan-park-declared-unfit-children
We saw people with no light in their eyes. We saw accommodation that does not belong in our country and heard of people having been there for over 10 years. We saw units squashed together and no hope of privacy. We saw people squeezed into living spaces where you can’t swing a kitten. We saw locked toilets, an unfenced and filthy creek, an unfenced deadly electric train track. We heard of prices that came very close to matching two-bedroom rent in Epsom. We heard of fear and despair.
Here is what I understand the least. You have known about this at least since 2008. These people – especially the children there – are examples of NZ’s most needy. Why wasn’t this your highest priority? In Parliament on May 29th you boasted about having contracted and committed to $5 billion for 10,356 Kiwibuild homes (for people such a trainee doctors) but acknowledged that you haven’t even started to look at legislated standards for those in camp grounds. Your government has put $1.2 billion in the vote buying middle-class welfare of fees free tertiary education but leave children and young people in these conditions of despair.
When asked in the House about people living in these circumstances you stated: “We don’t like it. We don’t approve of it.” Well, last time I checked, you are the Minister of Housing; if not you – then who? Maybe some of the $6.2 billion mentioned above could go the way of the most needy. It seems to me that your government started in the wrong place; i.e. “middle New Zealand” to try and ensure re-election in 2020. Please re-prioritise fast. These people need you and plenty of others will come out and help. Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due,    when it is in your power to act. (Proverbs 3:27)

Why the polls diverged

If you can afford a $650,000 deposit you don’t need a subsidy

Stuff reports:

Three people given pre-approval to buy a KiwiBuild house said they would be able to come up with $650,000 with the help of family members.
Radio New Zealand is reporting that despite being able to raise such a large sum of money, the three had annual incomes of less than $11,000.

If you can afford a $650,000 deposit, then you’re not really in need. A great example of the Government wasting money on welfare for the wealthy instead of helping those most at need.

Who governs in the OECD?

I thought it would be interesting to look at the 36 OECD members and see how many have centre-right and centre-left governments. The split as far as I can tell is:

Centre-Right (23)

  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Chile
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • France
  • Germany
  • Hungary
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Italy*
  • Japan
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania*
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Poland
  • Switzerland
  • Turkey
  • United Kingdom
  • United States

Centre-Left (13)

  • Canada
  • Estonia
  • Finland
  • Greece
  • Iceland
  • South Korea
  • Mexico
  • New Zealand
  • Portugal
  • Slovakia
  • Slovenia
  • Spain
  • Sweden

So around two thirds of OECD members currently have centre-right Governments.

Even more interesting when you adjust for population. Around 300 million live in a country with a CL Government and almost one billion in countries with a CR Government.

33% could vote for a conservative or Christian party

The One News Colmar Brunton poll asked if people would consider voting for a party with Christian or conservative values at the 2020 General Election.

33% said yes and 58% no.

That’s not a bad pool to be fishing in. Of course they would never get even half of those but if they can get 5% that is enough.

Time is right for Iraq tropps to return home

Stuff reports:

New Zealand troops will soon be coming home from Iraq in the next year, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has announced.

This seems a good timeframe. NZ troops have played a small but valuable role in training up the Iraqi Armed Forces. And it worked. They turned the tide on Islamic State and have now reclaimed all their lost territory.

Of course all three parties in Government opposed this role. Shamefully the current Defence Minister said the Iraqi military were cowards and we should not help them.

So it was the right decision to be there and help the people of Iraq reclaim their country from ISIL. But now that has happened, it is a good time to return home.

Latest cannabis poll

The Herald reports:

The latest poll shows that most voters do not want recreational cannabis to be legalised.
The result, from the 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll, showed that 52 per cent opposed legalisation, while 39 per cent favoured legalisation; 8 per cent did not know and 1 per cent said they would not vote.
It contrasts to other recent polls that showed majority support for legalisation, including last month when 52 per cent of those surveyed said in a Horizon poll that they would vote to legalise, while 37 per cent said they would vote ‘no’.
Officials are currently putting together a draft bill that will outline a proposed regulatory regime for legal cannabis, which will then be put to the public in a vote at the 2020 election.
According to the 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton poll, younger voters who supported the Green Party were more likely to favour legalisation.
Older National Party supporters were more likely to vote for the status quo.

The Newshub poll has 42% for legalisation and 48% against so broadly in agreement.

It looks like it could be a very tight vote. I think the status quo is not working and want change.

The photo anti-vaxxers don’t like

Vaccinations rid the world of Smallpox. Smallpox had a 30% fatality rate and killed 500 million people over 100 years.

Next time someone says they don’t support vaccinating, show them this photo.

Another postal voting failure

The Herald reports:

School principals are livid over delays in delivering Board of Trustees ballot papers with one saying she was prepared to the break the law to give parents time to vote.
Voting in the triennial elections for most school boards closed at noon on Friday, June 7.
But Ponsonby Primary School principal Dr Anne Malcolm said most of her parents did not receive their voting papers until about 2pm on Thursday, giving them less than 24 hours to read the candidates’ statements and get their votes in.
She put the blame squarely on “NZ Post inefficiency”.

“They sent the voting papers out on Monday May 27,” she said.
“It took 11 days for NZ Post to get mail into our letterboxes in the centre of Auckland, from Wellington, which is absolutely abhorrent.”

This is why local body elections should not continue with postal voting being the main mechanism to vote. You should be able to scan in your ballot paper and e-mail it or upload it to the Returning Officer.

A devastating fire

Stuff reports:

Just minutes after getting 27 sleepy children out of a smoky marae, the adults who saved their lives looked back to see the place engulfed in flames.
Those five adults’ actions, in the dead of night at Island Bay’s Tapu Te Ranga Marae, “undoubtedly” saved the lives of the 27 Scout cubs, New Zealand chief executive Joshua Tabor said.
Ngaio Scouts group leader Hadyn Nicholls said the adults supervising the one-night marae stay on Saturday night smelled smoke and quickly woke up the sleeping children then got them rapidly out of the marae and up the driveway.

Thankfully they all got out. The motto of “Be Prepared” is a good one!

But very sad for the marae. I grew up in Island Bay and the marae was an iconic building and a big part of the community.

A tale of two polls

Both TV networks released a poll tonight and the results are dramatically different. They are so far apart, that statistically it can’t be margin of error.

Let’s look at the four main parties:

  • Labour 42% in ONCB and 50.8%% in NRR
  • National 44% in ONCB and 37.4% in NRR
  • Greens 6% in ONCB and 6.2% in NRR
  • NZ First 5% in ONCB and 2.8% in NRR

You basically can’t reconcile these polls. One (or both) of them seem to be outside the 95% confidence interval, ie is the 1 in 20 “rogue” result.

The only other plausible explanation is that as the ONCB poll started a few days after NRR, Labour had a massive drop in support after those first few days. But the difference in dates is unlikely to explain the massive gap.

The polls ever show the direction of change differently. One has Labour down 6% and the other up 3.3%. National is up 4% in one and down 4% in another.

The NZ First result is also outside the margin of error. A 5% and a 2.8% result is outside the 95% confidence interval.

Bottom line is that at least one of those polls is wrong. They can’t both be right.

The “lack of depth”reshuffle

Stacey Kirk writes:

Housing Minister Phil Twyford brings a different set of headaches to the Cabinet table. Kiwibuild is failing on every measure, and it’s extremely problematic for the Government.
While there’s an argument no-one else could make gold out of that dog of a policy, there is also the counter that a new face in that portfolio would be far less tainted to have a mandate to simply wipe the slate clean. 

If Twyford does lose it, pity the bugger who picks it up.

On the up, Kris Faafoi is a shoo-in to be brought inside Cabinet and be given the meatier portfolio he’s earned through diligent work, careful comment and proving himself to be a safe pair of hands.
It may end up being too much of a leap up the ladder in a single bound, but it’s not unreasonable to think he’s competent enough to hold the spy portfolios. Michael Wood, a parliamentary under-secretary, is widely tipped to take one step forward as minister outside Cabinet.

Faafoi and Wood are the obvious promotions.

And through the reshuffle, Ardern has to try to acknowledge a gender imbalance in her ministerial lineup as best she can. With the loss of Clare Curran and Meka Whaitiri, due to blunders and alleged bullying respectively, it’s a heavily male affair. 
Whaitiri has the backing of Labour’s Māori caucus for a return. But it’s understood she can mount a media campaign complaining of unfair treatment all she wants – there’s no place in Ardern’s “kinder” Government, for a minister who, as an inquiry suggested was likely, laid hands on her staff. 

Returning Whaitiri to the Ministry would be a very bad look.

Louisa Wall is no option, although Poto Williams could be. 
Kieran McAnulty, Kiri Allan, Ginny Andersen and Priyanca​ Radhakrishnan are the freshman young guns who will all likely be destined for higher office at some point, if they keep their powder dry.

I’m surprised Deborah Russell isn’t mentioned. She is clearly capable of being a Minister.

Forest & Bird slates Government

Forest & Bird points out:

The Government’s announcement this morning they’re paying for cameras on 28 fishing boats is yet another major back down to the fishing industry, says Forest & Bird.  
 
“Putting cameras on boats in an area that already has near total observer coverage is a joke. Meanwhile, most commercial fishing boats in New Zealand will continue to operate without human or camera observers,” says Forest & Bird Chief Executive Kevin Hague.
 
“There are only 63 Māui dolphins in the world. If we want to save them, counting bodies on boats is too late. We need to stop dangerous set netting and trawling in their habitat, not put cameras on boats that mostly already have MPI staff on them.”
 
“There are over 1000 commercial fishing boats in our waters, the vast majority of which do not have any observer coverage at all.

So National was introducing cameras in basically all 1,000 fishing boats. This Government which claims to be focused on the environment and conservation is introducing them on just 3% of fishing boats, and ones that have observers on them already so they’ll actually achieve nothing.

Watkins on the non-hacking scandal

Tracy Watkins writes:

The butt-covering hit a new low last week with the revelation that GCSB bosses phoned their minister, Andrew Little, in a panic when they realised Makhlouf was blaming the Treasury budget breach on hackers.
It seems the phone call came too late to stop Makhlouf and Robertson’s office issuing press releases about the “hack” that wasn’t.
But there can only have been one purpose in leaking details of that phone call – to hang Makhlouf out to dry.
The higher the stakes, the dirtier and more desperate the tactics look.
It didn’t need to be like this. If there had been an admission from day one that the Treasury budget breach was a colossal stuff-up, it would have been a one day wonder.
There was no hack. Treasury’s secret budget documents were able to be accessed by the National Party with a simple search.
But we’ve ended up with an inquiry that seems designed to shut down questions, and a Government that looks embroiled in its own dirty politics scandal.
Labour’s danger is it starts to wash up against “brand Jacinda’, which is supposed to be above all this.
Why do politicians never seem to learn that the cover up is almost always worse than the crime?

The moment the GCSB contacted Ministers to tell them that Treasury was not hacked, Ministers should have insisted on correcting the public record.

Kiwibuild update

  • Affordable homes promised by 30 June: 1,000
  • Affordable homes built to date: 119
  • Shortfall: 881
  • Days to go: 22
  • Homes/day needed: 40
  • To make target a new home must be built every 36 minutes
  • To make target a new home must be built every 2,200 seconds
  • To make target a new home must be built every 513 seconds of a 40 hour week

A car free golden mile

Stuff reports:

Wellington’s Golden Mile could be car free by 2021, and speed limits on surrounding streets dropped to 30kmh.

A rare sensible initiative.

Bob Jones suggested some years ago the Golden Mile should be car free. In fact he also said bus free. Turn it into an open mall with outdoor cafes and the like.

The 30 km/hr speed limit on non arterial routes is fine also for the CBD. Too many pedestrians about to go faster than that.

First Retail Group managing director Chris Wilkinson said the changes would be good for the city.
“The reality is we need to create stronger priorities for public transport, and very few consumers actually drive through the Golden Mile. 
“People don’t drive down the Golden Mile, stop, and buy something. That happened 10 or 15 years ago, but over a long period of time parking has been declining in the city centre, which aligns with the [city] council’s District Plan.”

I agree. Make it happen.

Why are we giving visas to teen brides?

Stuff reports:

Immigration New Zealand has approved more than 20 partnership visas for child brides and grooms married or engaged to people living in or migrating to New Zealand during the past decade.
All of the brides and grooms were 16- or 17-years-old and most were from countries in the Middle East and Asia, according to information obtained by Stuff under the Official Information Act.
Last year, a 17-year-old Egyptian girl had her application approved so she could be with her 28-year-old Kiwi husband. In 2013, a 17-year-old bride-to-be from Pakistan was granted a partnership visa to live in New Zealand with her 28-year-old fiance, also from Pakistan.

That’s ridiculous. We should not be giving visas to teenagers to come to New Zealand as brides. At a minimum they can wait until they are 18 and legally an adult.

INZ said in each case, the teenager’s parent(s) or guardian(s) supported the application.

Oh great, the ones who may be selling them off into marriage.

What did Ministers know and when?

Paula Bennett released:

Finance Minister Grant Robertson and GCSB Minister Andrew Little need to tell the truth about what information they received from the GCSB and Treasury about how sensitive Budget information had been accessed, National’s Deputy Leader Paula Bennett says.
“Reports this morning that there was a desperate 11th hour phone call to Andrew Little from the head of the GCSB to say Treasury’s website had not been hacked shows that senior Government Ministers knew they were releasing false information to the public.
“It is inconceivable that the GCSB Minister didn’t immediately phone Finance Minister Grant Robertson and the Prime Minister to give them that information.

The report states that the phone call to Little occurred before Treasury and Robertson made their public statements claiming a criminal hack of Treasury, and a Police referral.

It is clear that Ardern and Robertson must have known that the hacking claim was false, either before Robertson did his press release or within minutes of it going out. Yet they said nothing for two days, despite having been told by the CGSB there was no hack.

Even worse the Treasury statement implied GCSB were the ones that had determined this was a criminal hack and should be notified to the Police. The reality is GCSB was telling their Minister it wasn’t.

Again there must be an independent inquiry into how this deliberate lie was allowed to be promulgated. The SSC inquiry can’t look at actions of Ministers or their staff.

Ardern admits education unions dictate policy to them