Russell wins New Lynn nomination

The Herald reports:

Deborah Russell has been announced as the Labour Party’s candidate to contest the New Lynn electorate in the general election.

Russell, a tax expert from Massey University, will replace the outgoing David Cunliffe from the traditionally safe Labour seat.

Russell was seen as an outsider in the bid to be Labour’s candidate, but had the support of the party’s hierarchy.

How disappointing that Labour has chosen a respected tax policy expert with excellent communication skills over the guy who set up a secret trust for David Cunliffe while Labour were campaigning against secret trusts.

While I will disagree with Deborah on many issues, I think she will be a very effective MP and (one day a) Minister. Good to see the best candidate win selection.

Little isolated on Waitangi

Richard Harman writes:

Prime Minister Bill English’s Waitangi Day gamble appears to have paid off.

His decision not to go to Waitangi itself left him open to criticism that it was the responsibility  of the Prime Minister to be at Waitangi  whether the mood there was “good or bad” as Labour Leader Andrew Little put it

Yet Little himself has said he now won’t go, due to the media ban. Little has been all over the place on this. On the same day where he conceded he would not attend in future (if ban not lifted), he had an op ed appear attacking Bill English for not attending. Own goal.

All of this made Labour’s complaints about the Prime Minister not being there look a little lame.

Indeed, privately, Labour MPs at Waitangi, said it might have been better if the party had also reserved its position about attending and left the option open of walking out of Te Tii.

Tamaki Makaurau MP Peeni Henare said his grandfather, Sir James Henare, a Tai Tokerau leader, had long regarded the Te Tii Marae as trouble and had therefore refused ever to visit it.

Little ended up saying that if the media ban were still in place year, Labour would not attend.

A pretty bad weekend for Little with his position on Waitangi becoming ridiculous and the backlash to his handpicked Willie Jackson candidature.

Meanwhile Bill English got a great reception at Orakei Marae:

But in two speeches at Ngati Whatua’s Orakei Marae he set out the Government’s commitment to the Treaty partnership in one of his most fluent and relaxed presentations since assuming the Prime Ministership last December.

And he also had a no drama call with the President of the United States. English’s decision to bypass Waitangi turned out to be incredibly well judged.

No thanks Mr Nduku

Stuff reports:

A former Zimbabwe secret police officer who murdered for President Robert Mugabe’s regime has entered New Zealand on a fake passport and is trying to set up a life here.

William Nduku, his tribal name, arrived in New Zealand in 2015. Living in limbo, he was refused asylum or the right to work and study and has been forced to survive on handouts from friends and the expat community and could face death if deported back to Zimbabwe.

I await the Green Party petition to demand he be given asylum.

He said at 19, he was forced to serve in Mugabe’s secret police and participated in up to 20 murders, several rapes and multiple tortures.

Of course now he would say he was forced to serve, but you know what – secret police tend to be the most fanatical loyal supporters of a regime, not conscripts.

He could have fled before he murdered, tortured and raped 20+ people. But he didn’t.

Nduku spent several months in Mt Eden prison. While in prison he alleged members of the Mongrel Mob assaulted him on a regular basis.

“It was awful. I wouldn’t wish that experience on anybody.”

Yeah almost as bad as being raped and tortured.

Nduku said he had been living off the generosity of others in Auckland, forced to try and make a living without the right to work.

Well not a lot of work available for murderers in New Zealand.

“It sometimes feels like the Government wants me to steal so that I can survive. I will never take anything that does not belong to me.”

Oh poor diddums. He will murder, rape and torture but he draws the line at stealing.

“I once stole a mango out of hunger, and my mother gave me such a beating for it. My mother raised us right.”

The mothers of his victims might disagree.

Human rights attorney Deborah Manning, who represents Nduku, has tried and failed to convince New Zealand’s Government to issue him a work or student visa.

Good. He should not be working, studying or living here.

English held up as example of dealing with Trump

Politico reports:

Still, not all of Trump’s phone calls have gone off the rails.

The trick to a good call with Trump is less about policy agreement than personal chemistry, said two people familiar with some of the world leader talks.

For example, New Zealand Prime Minister Bill English began his Sunday evening call with Trump by thanking the president for taking the time to talk during the Super Bowl and chatting about New Zealand golfer Bob Charles, said someone briefed on the call. The person said that set the tone for an amicable conversation, even though English went on to express disagreement with Trump’s executive order restricting travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries.

This is good. Regardless of what you personally think of Trump, he is the President of the United States for the next 206 weeks, and you want heads of governments to be able to engage constructively with each other.

Seymour on Reddit

Green MP labels a rant from a Maori woman as “Pakeha racism”

A woman in Huntly made a vile rant against some Muslim women who were walking by. One of them recorded it so we could see how vile some people are and how they treat strangers. Catherine Delahunty the Green MP jumps in and concludes that this is an example of Pakeha racism.

The only problem of course is that the women in question appears to be Maori. Would be sensible for a Member of Parliament not to make assumptions before she labels something as Pakeha racism.

Not many countries have a PM who can shear sheep

Watkins on the start to election year

Tracy Watkins writes:

Two things happened after Bill English named the election date that should worry his opponents.

National used its advantage to hit the ground running – promising more cops, whacking petrol companies about the head with an inquiry into pricing, and wiping historic homosexuality convictions.

Meanwhile, Labour squandered its good start to the year.

Add to that English’s good call on Waitangi and Little’s bad calls. And the liberalisation of medicinal cannabis.

One of Little’s MPs even hired a PR firm to publicly call him out on it. MPs have been expelled for less. 

Again, extraordinary.

Only one of these parties looks like it’s ready for an election.

The other looks like a candidate for euthanasia.

Kiwis have an insatiable appetite for Donald Trump. The world stops, even when Trump mouthpiece Sean Spicer speaks.

For the political junkies among us, it’s overwhelming – and strangely gratifying – to be surrounded by so many new sufferers of our disorder. 

But this is a new, extreme-tourism style of politics; loud, dangerous and frenetic. And it’s sucking up the political oxygen here.

The same day that English announced nearly 1000 new cops, the story broke about Trump’s “worst call by far” abuse of Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.  No contest.

The Opposition is finding it even harder to get traction.

But what happens when exhaustion sets in and Trump’s power to shock is diminished? Will a politics-weary public switch off?

That could be fatal for Labour and the Greens. When the phone is off the hook it’s hard for opposition parties to get cut through. 

Dirty Politics and Dot Com sucked up all the media last time, which helped National. Will Trump do the same? Who cares about the new housing policy announced by Labour, have you seen Donald Trump’s latest outraegous tweet!

But there is another scenario. One in which we get swept along by the same forces of extreme anti-establishment-ism, a deep cynicism with the political system and a rejection of the status quo. 

The things that were broken that drove change in Britain and the United States are not so broken here. There is still a high level of trust in the integrity of our institutions, immigration has not produced the same pressures as in Britain (and the rest of Europe) and we are untouched by terrorism.  

But Brexit and the US election were notable for the willingness of some deliberately to erode public confidence in the system and not always by telling the truth. 

Will the rules also be thrown out the window here? 

Hopefully not, but Winston will try. He has a Trump like connection to telling the truth.

Dilbert is pissed

The Blaze reports:

Scott Adams, creator the famed “Dilbert” comic strip, has been capturing attention over the last year or so with his observations about President Donald Trump and the public’s reaction to him. …

But in the wake of the riots at the University of California, Berkeley, over an appearance by alt-right firebrand Milo Yiannopoulos, Adams’ gloves appear to be completely off.

Adams said he’s ending his support of Berkeley, where he received an MBA years ago. “I have been a big supporter lately, with both my time and money, but that ends today,” he wrote in his blog post last Friday. “I wish them well, but I wouldn’t feel safe or welcome on the campus. A Berkeley professor made that clear to me recently. He seems smart, so I’ll take his word for it.”

Referring to Yiannopoulos, Adams said he “decided to side with the Jewish gay immigrant who has an African-American boyfriend, not the hypnotized zombie-boys in black masks who were clubbing people who hold different points of view. I feel that’s reasonable, but I know many will disagree, and possibly try to club me to death if I walk on campus.”

A great sentence in bold.

 

Labour is totally unified

Patent trolls vs Netflix

The Herald reports:

It was the feature that Netflix users had been waiting for, but it could prove to be a costly headache for the streaming giant.

Late last year, Netflix introduced a feature that allowed users to download content and watch it while they’re offline. It’s a fairly standard concept but Netflix took its time in rolling out the feature, perhaps because it was preparing its defences.

A company known solely for its work as a “patent troll” has now filed a lawsuit against the streaming giant claiming it owns the patent over the basic idea of downloading video from the internet for offline consumption.

A patent troll is a company whose business model is based primarily, if not entirely, on buying up patents and suing other companies for potential infringements in an effort to gouge money out of large businesses.

And that is exactly what Blackbird Technologies hopes to achieve at the expense of Netflix.

The company was founded by two former corporate patent lawyers, Wendy Verlander and Chris Freeman, and last week they filed a complaint against Netflix, as well as separate suits against Soundcloud, Vimeo and a few other online services for breaching their patent. …

The patent pertains to a system that allows website content to be downloaded and burned to a writeable CD and automatically sent to someone, without any human interaction.

This is why NZ did a very good thing in abolishing patents for software. The industry in the US is mired in patent lawsuits which do nothing but enrich lawyers and punish innovation.

Rodney Hide on the opportunity cost of compulsory te reo

Rodney Hide writes:

I would love to be able to speak te reo fluently. I would also like to play the violin, solve Einstein’s field equations and run a sub-three hour marathon.

I can’t do any of these things. It’s not that I am lazy. It’s that I am busy. I figure the reward wouldn’t justify the required effort. My priorities are where the effort is less and the reward greater.

There in a nutshell is the problem with making te reo compulsory in schools.

It would be marvellous if all our children were fluent but it would come with a cost. Students don’t now have an hour a day at school with nothing to do. That means dropping something in their curriculum to make way for te reo.

That’s where the Green and Labour MPs fall down. They don’t explain what is to be given up. Is it physical education, mathematics, science or English? Or a bit of each?

Schools and students should have flexibility as to what they teach rather than one size fits all. English, Science and Mathematics are basics which everyone needs some proficiency in to survive in the world.

The Greens at various times have said they want the following to be compulsory or near compulsory in schools:

  • Te reo
  • NZ History
  • Ecological sustainability
  • Civics
  • Human rights
  • Nutrition, basic cooking, gardening skills, and the origins and production of food

All arguably worthwhile stuff but as Rodney says every hour on one thing is an hour less for something else.

A Bassett book on NZ PMs

Fuseworks Media announced:

Political historian and writer Michael Bassett has been close to government for more than 50 years and has a unique perspective, having been in parliament with 11 Prime Ministers.

In case you are wondering who they are, they are:

  1. Keith Holyoake
  2. Jack Marshall
  3. Norman Kirk
  4. Bill Rowling
  5. Robert Muldoon
  6. David Lange
  7. Geoffrey Palmer
  8. Mike Moore
  9. Jim Bolger
  10. Jenny Shipley
  11. Helen Clark

Interesting that in his 18 years he was in Parliament with 18 PMs.

If you entered Parliament in 2002, then in 15 years you would have served with just two PMs – Clark and Key.

Now, in an election year, Bassett offers a timely and incisive appraisal of our 24 former leaders in forthcoming book New Zealand’s Prime Ministers: From Dick Seddon to John Key, published by David Ling Publishing in April 2017.

Can’t wait to read it. Bassett is a great writer and historian.

Bassett’s book reveals fresh insights into each Prime Minister’s personality and examines their distinctive styles, thinking, successes and failures. He also takes a long hard look at what worked with the public, and what didn’t.

Bassett says, “Of our 24 past Prime Ministers, John Key was the easiest in his skin. There was never any artifice about him. What you saw was what you got. He wasn’t our greatest Prime Minister: that honour goes to Peter Fraser who shepherded New Zealand through World War Two and in Winston Churchill’s words ‘never put a foot wrong’.

I agree with Fraser being the greatest.

Based on extensive, careful archival research, interviews with recent Prime Ministers, many of their colleagues, and with their opponents, this major work is the product of decades of appreciative and insightful observation. It is essential reading for anyone interested in New Zealand politics.

I’ve already asked for a copy!

New Zealand Second

Little 2/10 English 8/10

Audrey Young writes:

Rating the start to the political year, Bill English scores 8 out of 10; Andrew Little 2.

Luckily it’s not like it is election year or anything for Little. Oh wait, …..

But the rebellion over Willie Jackson has damaged Little and Labour in a way that won’t blow over in a week.

Little’s greatest accomplishment as leader – successfully instilling the need for party discipline – counted for nothing, and the chips weren’t even down.

The rebellion has three consequences: after all that hard work, Labour again looks like a party divided, Little looks like a leader who cannot lead his own party – which is all the more damaging when his attack line against English this year is that he is a prime minister but not a leader – and it alienates voters who identity with Willie Jackson.

It says to them that if Willie Jackson doesn’t belong to Labour, nor do they.

New Zealand First and Winston Peters and Shane Jones will be the beneficiaries.

Little and his advisers were shocked by the rebellion. They knew some people would be unhappy. But they expected it to be dealt with in private.

They thought people would say nothing publicly over the leader bypassing the party’s democratic procedures to announce a hand picked candidate will get a high list ranking?

Jackson’s treatment by Labour has become a confidence issue for Little.

Little should have sacked Poto Williams from her portfolios the moment he learnt she had hired a PR firm to help her attack his decision. Honest dissent is one thing, but that is unforgiveable in an MP.

Whatever Labour decides to do with Jackson, it has already given the Government added ammunition with which to taunt Labour. Its tease is no longer just about cozying up to the Greens.

National can now say the party that has swung so far left, that the old comrades Matt McCarten, Laila Harre and Willie Jackson from the Alliance have come home.

Yep the Labour of 2017 is the Alliance of the 1990s!

Auckland Council fun police targeting swings

The Herald reports:

Kiwis’ DIY resourcefulness is under threat from the Auckland Council, which is demanding the removal of children’s swings on street trees, in the name of safety and tree health.

Parents in Calgary St, Sandringham, are shocked to have been slapped with notices ordering them to dismantle swings – loved by children – outside their homes.

Bad enough that this is happening, but even worse ratepayers are forced to fund it.

I reckon parents should just refuse and tell the Council to take them to court. I’d be happy to contribute towards crowd funding legal costs.

More on North Korea’s magnificent economic achievements

In 2013 Gareth Morgan was quoted as saying:

What they found surprised them – a people who were poor, yes, but wonderfully engaged, well-dressed, fully employed and well informed. In Gareth’s view, what North Korea has achieved economically despite its lack of access to international money has been magnificent.

The Herald has some more details of these wonderfully engaged fully employed North Koreans enjoying the magnificent North Korean economy:

Last December, shocking footage emerged which revealed children as young as five doing hard labour.

The footage, released by UK newspaper The Mirror, showed young children working as a chain gang in a rail yard under the harsh sun.

Using hammers and axes, the youngsters can be seen hauling large sacks of heavy rocks as their teachers and other adults bark orders at them.

Just last month, it also emerged that North Korea’s Masikryong Ski Resort, popular with the country’s elite, has thousands of men, women and children working on the site often under horrendous conditions.

Using pickaxes, sticks and wooden shovels, workers are engaged in backbreaking work clearing the snow, NBC revealed.

The broadcaster also found some of the children appeared to be only 11 or 12 while many others looked to be teenagers.

Truly magnificent.

Vance on Williams and Jackson

Andrea Vance writes:

Labour should be championing MPs like Poto Williams. Brave, willing to speak their mind and stand up for the vulnerable.

Instead, Andrew Little’s office appear to have humiliated her by making her publicly back down. …

The handling of this little skirmish was cloddish. Firstly, Little misled journalists on Thursday by claiming Jackson hadn’t made up his mind and this was all a rumour started by the Maori party.

Behind the scenes, Labour MPs and members were seething with rage – both over the unfair leap-frogging and the casual abandonment of the party’s gender quota. The obfuscation further enraged them.

Right from the beginning, Andrew Little should have brushed off the Williams-Jackson spat. Labour is a broad church, after all. And outside of the Beltway, no one was paying that much attention.

The over-sensitive reaction has blown the story out of all proportion – and into the news bulletins for another day.

But worst of all, Labour is now the party that gagged one of its promising female MPs to spare the pride of a man who victim-shamed a teenager, live on air.

But it seems that’s ok, because some commentators judge he has the ‘common-touch’ with voters.

And we thought “I’m sorry for being a man” was a low point.

Never ever assume Labour has reached a low point. They always have the capacity to get lower.

QC appointed for CERA investigation

Stuff reports:

Former solicitor-general Michael Heron QC will lead an investigation into allegations against former Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (Cera) staffers.

The three men – Greater Christchurch Investment Strategy manager Murray Cleverley and investment facilitators Gerard Gallagher and Simon Nikoloff – allegedly used their public body roles to advance private business interests, a Stuff investigation revealed.

The men, who were employed by Cera to bring investment to post-quake Christchurch, had their own company that offered investors property proposals in the hope of earning large finder’s fees.

Good to see such a senior lawyer appointed to investigate. It is reassuring the SSC is taking this very seriously.

Simon Wilson on Bill English’s Waitangi Day speeches

Simon Wilson writes:

The prime minister spent his first Waitangi Day in office not at the treaty grounds, but at Bastion Point, where Simon Wilson watched him give two of the most surprising Waitangi speeches in living memory.

Did you know Bill English used Waitangi Day to praise the great protest struggle of Bastion Point?

He made two speeches on the marae at Bastion Point that day, both of them in front of TV cameras and other media. Almost none of what he said got reported. Instead, there was a frenzy of excitement over his utterly inconsequential phone call with Donald Trump. But what the prime minister said on the marae at Bastion Point was extraordinary.

So what did he say?

He told them the modern history of Ngāti Whātua was a story of great success. And he wanted them to know he did not view the protest as an aberration in that story, but as a vital part of it. Later, over breakfast in the wharekai, he built on his theme.

There was a large audience – Ngāti Whātua, politicians, community representatives and media – and he said we are all engaged in a “great enterprise” of building a country based on “fairness, tolerance and respect”. Then he said, “We’ve all got better at it because of our struggles over the treaty.” …

Bill English acknowledged the “massive achievements of Ngāti Whātua in such a short space of time” and said he wanted to “celebrate a group of people with the leadership and courage to make… decisions”.

He said he knew what it cost the kaumātua who negotiated treaty settlements. At another iwi, one leader had told him he’d been unable to sleep the night before they signed. “He said he struggled with the burden of knowing he must say to his ancestors, ‘That’s enough.’ And he struggled with the responsibility of saying the same to his descendants.”

There are so many ways in which treaty settlements are different for Māori and Pākehā, and that’s one of them: Pākehā don’t think like that.

Deciding to settle wouldn’t be an easy decision I’m sure, as you would feel the weight of expectations from your Iwi past present and future.

“In the regions,” he said, “and I include Auckland in that, I would say that almost without exception the organisations that are most committed to development are the local iwi.”

That’s another remarkable thing for him to say. Iwi are economic powerhouses in the regions and major agents of social cohesion. Despite what Don Brash and his band of Hobson’s Pledge ostriches might want us to think, they’re not stripping the country of its assets and infrastructure – they’re building them.

Ngai Tahu has said there are a number of SOEs they would like to invest in – the benefit being they are an investor that will never leave New Zealand and be here permanently.

First, have we ever before had a National Party prime minister who speaks so unequivocally in support of Māori agency – and of Māori activism that lays the foundation for Māori agency?

Second, if the Bastion Point protest was historically invaluable, what does that say for other protest movements today – inside Māoridom and more widely?

Third, if English will say these things on the marae, will he say them in Parliament, and in the regions, to business groups and to his own party – will he say them to audiences who are not already primed to agree? He’s a diffident leader, a quiet explainer more than an engaging winner of hearts and minds, and he’s as liable as most politicians to duck the difficult issues when it’s hard to stand up for them.

Mind you, he probably thought he was saying all this to a wider audience because he probably assumed his Waitangi Day speeches would be reported. Especially as he made it clear he knew Ngāti Whātua’s achievements were founded on that great protest occupation. Audrey Young in the Herald covered some of it; almost no other media mentioned anything. It’s not English’s fault if he gets ignored when he speaks up.

This is why it is good we have sites like The Spinoff.

Attacking a Judge a bad sign

Stuff reports:

President Donald Trump on Saturday morning (Sunday NZ Time) ripped into a federal judge’s decision to temporarily block enforcement of his controversial travel ban. …

In another Twitter message, Trump added: “The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!”

This is again Trump showing his authoritarian instincts rather than democratic ones. He is the President, not a sole ruler.

It is quite normal for a President to say they disagree with a ruling and will appeal it. But they normally go out of their way to say they respect the role of the courts. Instead Trump personally attacks the Judge. This is not good, to say the least.