Celebrating Excellence and using it as Inspiration

For sport around the globe the last week has been incredible.

First of all the retirement on Roger Federer at 41 years of age and with 20 grand slam singles titles in his resume. A few years back (2003) I was wandering in Melbourne and as I walked past the gate to the Rod Laver Arena the billboard said, “Davis Cup – Roger Federer vs Mark Philippoussis and Marc Rosset vs Leighton Hewitt.” I checked my watch and they were playing that afternoon/evening. I checked at the box office and bought one of the four remaining tickets for this Davis Cup clash. Davis Cup is known for the explosive parochialism of the crowds. Federer was so good, truly a class above, that when he had demolished Philippoussis, in straight sets, he received a standing ovation. Truly a sporting GREAT and seeing Borg and McEnroe farewelling him as the greatest a few days back was special.

Yesterday in Wollongong was the men’s race at the world road cycling championships. Again I have been lucky to attend one of the events (Richmond, Virginia in 2015) along with 650,000 others. The world champs is a grueling one day event of over 260km – ridden in big laps that drives everything to a frenzy over the six hours it takes. It is never slow or easy and every nation’s team is strategizing the whole day through. A twenty-two year old from Belgium, Remco Evenepoel, rode away from the remarkable field of athletes to ride most of the last thirty kilometers on his own and win this highly prestigious race. Incredible. Our media chose to concentrate on another cyclist being arrested when after hours of being disturbed the night before the race by kids banging on his door – he told them to shove-off and push them on their way. The race took over six hours and these people are stunning examples of what humans can do.

As that race was finishing in Australia the Berlin marathon was starting with over 45,000 runners from 120 countries and a million spectators. In terms of a winner all interest was in 37 year old Eliud Kipchoge from Kenya. His resume is the running equivalent of Federer’s tennis one. Yesterday he ran so superbly that for the first 25km he was tracking towards a sub-2 hour certified marathon (he has bettered that time in a tailored time-trial). In the last 17km he slowed a tiny amount but still set a new world record of 2:01.09 – and managed to look like he been up the driveway to check the mail.

New Zealand has adopted a fortress mentality with our response to covid and become very introvert. It is good to know that the world has moved on and great people have gone back to doing extraordinary things.

So – as you spend your day mourning the loss of Queen Elizabeth the 2nd. If you want a pick-me-up please look up those three events above.



Headline should be 0/700 drivers drunk

The ODT headline:

The gauntlet for drink-drivers is getting narrower, Dunedin police say, after hundreds of motorists were breath-tested in the city yesterday. 

Constable Nick Turner, of Dunedin, said their impairment team tested 700 drivers during their shift yesterday.

During one checkpoint in Brighton at 4.30pm, 24 drivers were found to have alcohol on their breath, which suggested people were having a beer before driving home, Const Turner said.

None of the drivers was found to be over the legal alcohol limit.

This should be a good news story. 700 people were tested and not a single one was over the legal limit.

It’s great that the 24 people who had a small amount of alcohol in their system knew to only have one or two drinks, to remain safe.

General Debate 26 September 2022

The race for Auckland

Two polls have both shown Wayne Brown now in the lead for the Auckland Mayoralty.

A Curia-Auckland Ratepayers’ Alliance poll from 11 to 18 September had Wayne Brown 2% ahead of Efeso Collins, and a Kantar-Q+A poll from 16 to 20 September has Brown 6% ahead. The Curia poll had Viv Beck withdraw halfway through the polling period while the Kantar poll was taken entirely afterwards (they also did a poll before hand, but redid it once Beck withdrew).

This confirms it is clearly a two horse race now between Brown and Collins, with Brown in the lead.

Collins is a very decent guy, and he would be more independent than Goff was. Yes he is Labour and backed by Labour, but he has been quite independent in how he voted on Council. If you were to have a Labour aligned Mayor, he would be a better choice than Richard Hills whose only mission as Mayor would be to help get Jacinda re-elected. Collins is not just a partisan hack.

That is not to say that I agree with his policies. I don’t. Free public transport is a monumentally stupid idea. The reason is simple – it will increase usage of public transport, but massively decrease quality as there will be no money to pay for extra capacity etc.

Brown has a formidable reputation as a very competent change manager, and if elected he is promising to upend the status quo. This is a good thing, as the vast majority of Aucklanders think the status quo is terrible. But there are question marks over his ability to take people with him – and the Mayor is only one vote.

Most promising is Brown has pledged to reduce the staffing bill for the Council, especially at the top end. It is pretty much impossible to keep rates increases low, unless you focus on staffing, as that is by far the largest cost. If Brown is elected, I suspect there will be a massive turnover of staff at the second and third level.

I would certainly vote for Brown if I loved in Auckland. If anyone can get the CCOs under control, it will be him.

For meaningful change, one needs to change not just the Mayor, but also the Council. Below are the candidates worth voting for, if you want a Council less likely to sign off huge rates increase. Inclusion here is not an endorsement of everything they do – it may be simply they are the lesser evil 🙂

  • Albany – Wayne Walker and John Watson
  • AEP – Christine Fletcher and Will McKenzie
  • Franklin – either Andy Baker or Keven Mealamu
  • Howick – Maurice Williamson and Sharon Stewart
  • Manukau – Malcolm Turner
  • Manurewa-Papakura – Daniel Newman and Rangi McLean
  • Maungakiekie-Tamaki – Troy Eilliott
  • North Shore – Danielle Grant and George Wood
  • Ōrākei – Desley Simpson
  • Rodney – Greg Sayers
  • Waitākere – Ken Turner and Shawn Blanchfield
  • Waitematā and Gulf: Mike Lee
  • Whau: Tracy Mullholland

Dead for showing a few locks of hair

Marina Nemat at CNN writes:

Mahsa Amini is dead because she let the world see a few locks of her hair. She was 22-years-old, beautiful, and full of hope and promise. She died in the custody of Iran’s morality police. She was neither the first, nor will she be the last.

Iranian officials claim she died after suffering a “heart attack” and falling into a coma (she was detained for allegedly breaking rules on wearing the hijab). But Amini’s family – and demonstrators across the country – aren’t buying it. Watching dramatic images of protesters burning their hijabs, cutting their hair and violent confrontations with security forces, shows how little has changed since my own teenage years at the hands of police and Revolutionary Guard brutality.

She was murdered by the regime because she showed some hair. Barbaric.

I was one of those who spoke out against the regime and paid the price – though not as dearly as some of my fellow activists. At the age of 16, I was accused of being an anti-revolutionary and sent to Tehran’s notorious Evin prison.

Even now, decades later, every night when I go to bed, I think of my cellmates. Many are dead, executed by the Islamic Republic of Iran in the 1980s. And those who survived, like me, were tortured in prison. Guards and interrogators, all men, tied us to bare beds in small, windowless rooms that stunk of sweat, urine, and fear, and they lashed the soles of our feet with lengths of cable – heavy, hard, and cruel. It hurt so much that I could not even scream. I was later led to a mock execution, threatened, and raped. I was practically a child and so were many of my cellmates.

Makes the Taliban look civilised.

Why Sweden swung right

The recent election in Sweden saw the Sweden Democrats gain 11 seats and about to join Government for the first time. In 2010 they entered Parliament with 20 seats and now have 73 seats.

Many people have wondered why so many people in Sweden now vote for a party that is seen as hard right.

Well the reason is pretty simple. Guess how many bombings there have been in Sweden since 2018? Most people would think maybe 1 or 2, perhaps half a dozen. I mean a bombing is a major event, you would expect to hear about.

The answer is around 500!

Paulina Neuding writes at Common Sense:

Yesterday morning, Swedes woke up to news of a kind that has become all-too familiar: During the night, powerful bombs exploded at apartment buildings in two different towns in southern Sweden. 

One person was severely injured in Åstorp, where a witness told the press: “People screamed and cried. It felt so unreal.” A resident told Radio Sweden that his 7-year-old had come running into his bedroom screaming, as the blast made their apartment shake. 

In Helsingborg, the explosion was so powerful that, according to the police, cars parked nearby were destroyed. It is still unclear if the bombings are connected to each other, or who is behind them.

Since 2018, there have been almost 500 bombings—yes, bombings—in what is known as one of the most stable societies in the world.  

There’s not just a bombing problem. There are shootings, too. 

Sweden, which has a population of around 10 million, has the highest per-capita number of deadly shootings of 22 European countriesForty-seven people have been shot dead so far this year, which, while far from American levels of gun homicide, is extreme for Europe. Other European countries have come to look at Sweden with horror

Around 100 bombings a year and a fatal shooting every few days.

Among shooting suspects, 85 percent are first- or second-generation immigrants, according to the newspaper Dagens Nyheter, as immigrant neighborhoods have become hotbeds for gang crime. National Police Commissioner Anders Thornberg has described the violence as “an entirely different kind of brutality than we’ve seen before” and his deputy, Mats Löfving, says that 40 criminal clans now operate throughout the country. Spreading fear are “humiliation robberies,” targeting children and youth, in which victims are subjected to degrading treatment by assailants, such as being urinated upon. Just this week, four men were sentenced for robbing, beating and urinating on an 18-year-old, who was also filmed by his tormentors. 

I am a big fan of immigration, done well (as generally done in NZ). But immigration done badly where integration doesn’t occur can be very harmful, and this has happened in Sweden.

In response to Sweden’s increasing problems with gang violence and social unrest in immigrant suburbs, the government’s strategy for many years was to deny how serious the situation had become. ​​In the meantime, those people who noticed the problem—many of whom were working class—and spoke out about their diminished safety were accused of racism by leading politicians, the mainstream press, and the cultural elites. Only one political party did not: the SD. And in election after election, they gained more and more popular support.

If the moderate centrist parties won’t confront an issue for fear of being called racist, then the parties further away from the centre who do confront it will gain support as people think there is no other option.

Many immigrants have integrated well into Swedish society, but too many have ended up in segregated suburbs, where unemployment is high and crime is rampant. In an area like Malmö’s Rosengård, for instance, labor force participation among adults is less than 50 percent, and 21 percent of households rely on social welfare.  

Again integration is key.

When stories started appearing about gang-rule and attacks on people going into immigrant neighborhoods, sometimes referred to as “no-go zones,” a government agency started a PR campaign to rename them “go-go zones.” The government had help from left-leaning Swedish media. In 2015, the editorial page of Dagens Nyheter, for instance, said that people expressing alarm about crime were “safety-deniers,” and compared them to climate deniers. 

Laughing at the PR campaign – could imagine that happening in NZ also.

General Debate 25 September 2022

Pagani on Wellington priorities

Josie Pagani writes:

Fifty-seven per cent of voters in Wellington want their city council to fix their ‘’pipes and water infrastructure’’. It’s their highest priority.

Two per cent want more cycleways, the lowest priority.

The council has reflected voters’ preferences by agreeing to spend $226 million on more cycleways. However much it might have spent on fixing pipes, they continue to eject effluent on to the streets with metronomic regularity.

Voters don’t dislike cycleways. They are over the priority placing they get compared to other civic enhancements.

Exactly. We need a Council that will focus on core services and facilities such as water, playgrounds, libraries, parks etc and less on white elephants.

2022 Mood of the Boardroom scores

The annual Herald Mood of the Boardroom has occurred and as usual I summarise the scores CEOs give to key politicians. While CEOs are not representative of all NZers it is interesting to see how their scores have changed from last year and which MPs are seen as better and worse performing.

A huge decline for most Ministers this year, with some saying it is the worst Government since Muldoon.

Scores are on a 1 to 5 scale so 3 is middle.

  1. David Seymour 4.08 (-0.28)
  2. James Shaw 3.27 (+0.21)
  3. Chris Luxon 3.24 (+1.18 from Collins)
  4. Grant Robertson 2.98 (-0.70)
  5. Chris Hipkins 2.95 (-0.01)
  6. Damien O’Connor 2.92 (+0.34)
  7. Kiri Allan 2.83 (-0.32)
  8. Ayesha Verrall 2.49 (-0.32)
  9. Stuart Nash 2.43 (+0.09)
  10. Megan Woods 2.42 (+0.04)
  11. Peeni Henare 2.39 (-0.12)
  12. Andrew Little 2.37 (-0.48)
  13. Jan Tinetti 2.34 (+0.12)
  14. Jacinda Ardern 2.30 (-0.73)
  15. Kieran McAnulty 2.25
  16. Michael Wood 2.19 (+0.04)
  17. Carmel Sepuloni 2.13 (+0.04)
  18. Aupito William Sio 2.12 (-0.28)
  19. Meka Whaitiri 2.03 (-0.30)
  20. David Parker 2.00 (-0.57)
  21. Priyanca Radhakrishnan 2.00
  22. David Clark 1.96 (-0.21)
  23. Nanaia Mahuta 1.93 (-0.83)
  24. Willie Jackson 1.89 (-0.31)
  25. Marama Davidson 1.93 (-0.20)
  26. Phil Twyford 1.78 (-0.1)
  27. Poto Williams 1.62 (-0.36)
  28. Kelvin Davis 1.66 (-0.07)

Amazing that the Labour Deputy Leader is rated bottom. Could you imagine Don McKinnon, Michael Cullen or Bill English being outside the top 10, let alone bottom?

And could you imagine Helen Clark or John Key being rated only 12th best performing Minister?

Also very amused that the Minister ranked highest by CEOS, and by a large margin, is Greens co-leader James Shaw. That won’t help him when the Marxist faction come again for him next year.

The largest drops are:

  1. Nanaia Mahuta -0.83
  2. Jacinda Ardern -0.73
  3. Grant Robertson -0.70
  4. David Parker -0.57

hil Twyford will be glad he has Kelvin there to make him look good.

They also rate Ardern in a number of different areas:

  1. Leverages personal brand 3.56 (-0.34)
  2. Security and intelligence 3.41 (+0.96)
  3. Stands up to China 2.90 (-0.38)
  4. Climate change response 2.63 (-0.21)
  5. Political performance 2.54 (-0.76)
  6. Child poverty reduction 1.73
  7. Transformative change 1.70 (-0.38)
  8. Build confidence with business 1.61 (-0.36)

So Ardern has shot up for her handling of security and intelligence, but massive drop in political performance and large drops in all other areas.

The Herald’s Councillor ratings

Simon Wilson and Bernard Orsman have given their ratings for the incumbent Auckland Councillors. I’m amazed so many got 8/10s or higher because if they were all so brilliant, then why does the Council have only 20% or so of Aucklanders thinking they are doing a good job. Seems a mismatch.

Anyway here are their ratings (averaged), for those interested.

  • 9/10 – Desley Simpson
  • 8/10 – Phil Goff, Jo Bartley, Bill Cashmore, Angela Dalton, Richard Hills
  • 7.5/10 – Pippa Coom, Chris Darby
  • 7/10 – Cathy Casey, Efeso Collins
  • 6.5/10 – Linda Cooper, Alf Filipaina, Shane Henderson
  • 5.5/10 – Daniel Newman, Paul Young
  • 5/10 – John Watson
  • 4/10 – Christine Fletcher, Tracy Mulholland
  • 2.5/10 – Greg Sayers, Sharon Stewart, Wayne Walker

Those who vote with Goff seem to all get rated very highly and those who don’t, very poorly.

General Debate 24 September 2022

Grant promises tax hikes for everyone

The Herald reports:

Finance Minister Grant Robertson remains committed to passing legislation to create a state income insurance scheme before next year’s general election.

Every working Kiwi will see their take home pay slashed under Grant’s plan. It’s a $3.5 billion tax hike which will see workers pay up to $1,800 a year so people made redundant can get paid up to $400 a day to not find a job.

The only way to stop this massive tax hike will be to vote them out next year.

NY sues Trump for $250 million

CNBC reports:

New York Attorney General Letitia James on Wednesday sued former President Donald Trump, the Trump Organization, three of his adult children and others for allegedly widespread fraud involving years’ worth of false financial statements related to the company’s business.

The 220-page civil lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court seeks at least $250 million in damages.

It also seeks to permanently bar Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump and Ivanka Trump from serving as an officer of a company in New York, and permanently prohibit the Trump companies named in the suit from doing business in New York state.

James said she has asked federal prosecutors in Manhattan and the IRS to investigate Trump for possible federal crimes. She said that evidence obtained during her three-year civil probe of Trump indicated possible crimes of bank fraud and making false statements to financial institutions. …

James pointed to a Manhattan property listed in the lawsuit, 40 Wall St., as an example of that.

She said that the Trump Organization and Trump received appraisals from a bank calculating the value of that property at $200 million as of Aug. 1, 2010, and $220 million as of November 1, 2012.

But in Trump’s 2011 Statement of Financial Condition, 40 Wall St. was listed as having a value of $524 million. That valuation then increased to $527 million in Trump’s 2012 statement and to $530 million in the 2013 statement, or “more than twice the value calculated by the ‘professionals,’” the suit said

Can’t wait for the trial. Hopefully the defence will be better than Trump’s current efforts in the classified documents saga. Mediaite reports:

Donald Trump claimed the president of the United States can declassify government documents simply by declaring them as such, or “even by thinking about it.”

Declassification by mere thought!!

Nuts

Stuff reports:

Give children “the vote when they’re seven, and the world will be a whole lot better”, says lecturer, child counsellor and neuroscience educator Nathan Wallis.

Speaking to Simon Bridges on the latest episode of Stuff’s long-form interview podcast Generally Famous, Wallis explained why he thinks the younger generation should have a say in choosing our next PM.

All the reasons people say an 8-year-old can’t vote “are the same reasons they gave for why you couldn’t give black people the vote, or women”, Wallis says.

People remain black all their lives and remain women all their lives. You don’t remain seven years old all your life. It is an inane argument.

NEW – Data Process – newly released Equity Index Numbers vs Achievement in NZ High Schools

Dear Kiwiblog Folk

After the release of all of the new Equity Index (EQI) numbers yesterday I did a, long/late night process to match those numbers to: 

– L3 Achievement

– UE Achievement

– Retention to 17yo

– Progress to Degree Level Study

… for every high school in NZ.

The final sheets in the dataset have trend line diagrams which strongly indicate that the 37 Variables used to develop the data set by no means explain what is happening in many schools (for good and bad). 

It would be interesting to know if being male  was a variable given how far NZ boys are behind girls. 

The good aspect for teacher practice/school aspiration is the schools that are clearly beating their EQI “expectations”). Examples are:

– Baradene College

– Iona College

– St Peter’s Epsom

– Columba College 

– Marist College

– Nga Tawa

– St Paul’s Ponsonby

– Al Madina

– Hato Paora

– Manukura

– Christchurch GHS

– St Catherine’s Kilbirnie

– Roxburgh Area School

– TKKM o Hoani Waititi

– Swelwyn College

– Zayed School for Girls

– Liston College

– Auckland Grammar Girls School

– McAuley College

Seems like a good group to learn from!

This is a very valuable data set for overall programme evaluation and goal setting/planning. All data is for LEAVERS – the most important category.

If you would like a copy of this data-set please let me know.

It is highly informative and I would be very happy to discuss aspects.

Regards

Alwyn Poole
[email protected]

General Debate 23 September 2022

Hipkins apologises for smearing English

Stuff reports:

Public Service Minister Chris Hipkins has apologised in the House to former finance minister Sir Bill English for dragging his family into an exchange over government contracts awarded to the husband of Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta.

Hipkins on Wednesday afternoon interjected during Question Time with an apparent reference to English’s brothers being provided government appointments. This came after ACT leader David Seymour questioned the Government on the contracts awarded to Mahuta’s family.

“Let’s talk about Bill English’s family, shall we?” Hipkins said, suggesting English’s family members were treated differently because they were “white”.

Labour love to play the race card to defend themselves. But this has backfired on them, because the facts are so bad.

What Hipkins was referring to was the appointment of Mervyn English to a fixed term role in the Ministry of Health in 2011, to set up a Health Sector Forum.

Mervyn was a career public servant. He had spent six years as a general manager at the Electricity Commission before the Health role. After that role, he held senior roles in the State Services Commission and DOC.

His brother, Bill, was not a Minister of Health.

Labour did actually question the appointment at the time, with Grant Robertson asking questions in Parliament.

The Minister Tony Ryall immediately asked the SSC to investigate, and they found everything was done properly.

Now compare this to the Mahuta contracts:

  • None of the Ormsbys seem to have had a background in the public sector and only gained contracts once Mahuta was a Minister
  • They were given consulting contracts, not an employment contract
  • Three of the four contracts were in portfolios that Mahuta was a Minister
  • Internal reviews to date have found proper processes were not followed
  • The Government has spent months resisting an inquiry

So Labour playing the race card and trying to smear the English family over the Mahuta saga is very disappointing.

A free speech voting guide

PSC launches Mahuta probe

The Herald reports:

Public service commissioner Peter Hughes is looking into the awarding of contracts to businesses associated with family members of Cabinet minister Nanaia Mahuta.

National Party spokesman for Public Services Simeon Brown first requested the commission investigate the matter in August, as details of a series of government contracts related to two companies owned by or related to Gannin Ormsby continued to emerge.

Ormsby is Mahuta’s husband.

This is a good thing.

Agencies appear to have bent over backwards to shovel work to Ormsby and co. Most contractors have to go through a burdensome tender process where you spend a couple of days filling in an RFP and then a panel considers all the RFPs against known criteria and recommend a contract. But in all of these cases Ormsby was contracted with no tender and sometimes without even a written contract.

General Debate 22 September 2022

The male education crisis get worse

One News reports:

The percentage of domestic university students who are men has reached an all-time low of 39%, and it is worrying universities.

This will not be new to readers of Kiwiblog. I blogged in 2018 that men are:

  • 11% less likely to get NCEA Level 1
  • 7% less likely to get NCEA Level 2
  • 14% less likely to get NCEA Level 3
  • 25% more likely to leave school with no qualifications
  • Twice as likely to be a high (special) needs student
  • 27% less likely to get UE
  • Three times more likely to be stood down, suspended
  • 5 times more likely to be excluded or expelled
  • 42% less likely to be in tertiary education
  • 36% less likely to obtain a diploma
  • 37% less likely to obtain a bachelors degree
  • 25% less likely to get Honours
  • 37% less likely to get Masters
  • 26% less likely to get a PhD

If women were 42% less likely to be in tertiary education, we would have stories every week demanding the Government take action to reduce the inequality. But when it is boys failing at school and not gaining UE, there seems to be no urgency towards turning this around.

The problem with the status quo

Supporters of New Zealand remaining a constitutional monarchy, say that the status quo is fine. That unless you can point to a problem, why change.

I don’t think the status quo works well, from a constitutional point of view. It doesn’t work well, because it gives the PM far too much power.

In New Zealand the effective head of state is the Governor-General. The perform both the ceremonial roles, but also the constitutional roles such as appointing a Prime Minister who has confidence of the House, approving an election etc. And while it is rare for the GG to have to use discretion, it is not unheard of. The most famous case being Sir John Kerr in Australia. But they have been used twice at state level in Australia. In Canada two PMs have had GGs refuse requests leading them to resign. And in NZ we almost had the GG intervene in 1984 when Muldoon refused to act on the advice of the incoming PM.

In 1993 the GG appointed a committee of four people to advise her on who to appoint PM, as there was a hung Parliament. If Peter Tapsell had not become Speaker, she would have acted on the advise of this ad hoc committee,

So it is naive to think we will never have a situation where the GG has to use their reserve powers. And that is the problem with the status quo.

Who effectively appoints the GG? It isn’t Parliament. It isn’t even Cabinet. It is the PM, in his or her sole discretion. And the PM effectively has the power to sack the GG immediately. If Whitlam had realsed what Sir John Kerr was planning to do, and had got in first and advised the Queen to sack Kerr, she would have been obliged to do so.

It is somewhat mickey mouse to have the Head of Government unilaterally appoint (and be able to sack) the effective Head of State – whose job may require them to act independently if there is a question around the confidence of the House.

The King (weird to write that) can not intervene in a dispute between the GG and the PM. If asked to, he must back the incumbent PM by convention. If a GG refused a call by a PM to have an early election (as they have lost the confidence of the House), the PM could get the GG sacked and replaced within 24 hours.

So the status quo is somewhat broken. I want a system where the effective head of state can’t be sacked at whim by the Prime Minister of the day. I want a system where Muldoon can’t appoint a former National PM as GG and Geoffrey Palmer can’t appoint a Labour Party Mayor as GG.

That system is simple. You have Parliament appoint the Head of State by a 75% super-majority. This will mean that you’ll never get a politician again. The only people acceptable to a 75% super-majority of Parliament will be those who have distinguished themselves in areas outside politics.

Another Ormsby inquiry

The Herald reports:

A third government agency is reviewing the process by which it engaged a consultancy wholly owned by Gannin Ormsby, the husband of Government minister Nanaia Mahuta.

The news follows the admission that, contrary to its policy, the agency followed no formal conflict of interest process in procuring the work.

All of the contracts were non-contestable. They were not part of an open process.

Kāinga Ora said that no written work was supplied by Ka Awatea under the contract. Rather, Rama Ormsby “facilitated” 14 workshops and six hui with Auckland iwi.

And there was no written output from the huis?

The facilitation work began in August, 2020, however, a written contract was not signed until October, 2020, by which point fully half of the hui and workshops had already taken place.

Questioned about this timeline, Kāinga Ora’s Te Ariki Pihama, deputy chief executive of the agency’s Group Māori, said the agency had a verbal agreement with Ka Awatea to commence work in August.

So it was a verbal agreement!

The National Party’s Simeon Brown said he has twice written to the Public Service Commission and called for an investigation into the wider picture of government procurement, Gannin Ormsby, and other of his family members.

Both the National and Act parties say the “extraordinary pattern” of government contracts awarded of Minister Mahuta’s husband and other family members requires comprehensive investigation by either the Auditor General or the Public Service Commission.

Kāinga Ora, the Ministry for the Environment, and the Department of Conservation, all contracted work from Ormsby’s company, Ka Awatea Services, in October and November 2020. All of the contracts were awarded on a sole source basis, without competitive bids.

I should stress I have seen nothing to suggest that Nanaia Mahuta has acted inappropriately. The issue is more that public service agencies seem to be bending over backwards to give contracts to her relatives, without following any sort of robust process.

The other issue is that the outcomes or outputs from the contracts have been derisory.

General Debate 21 September 2022

Snowflake lecturer

Stuff reports:

Victoria University of Wellington lecturer has retracted an emotionally charged email in which he claimed students had “lied” and “cheated” after many failed to watch his queer criminology lecture online.

Lecturer Ti Lamusse told his Criminology 316 students they had shown “profound academic dishonesty and demonstrated disrespect for your teaching staff and the people whose lives you could have learned about if you had bothered to do so”.

The line, “I am ashamed of you as a cohort of students,” was formatted in bold.

Lamusse said he was “in tears” after seeing fewer than a third of his students had watched the lecture on Monday, September 12, which took him “three weeks to prepare”. Lamusse told his students that if he had acted in the same way, he would be deeply ashamed of himself, and his whānau would be ashamed of him.

He broke down in tears because not all his students watched one of his lectures? My God.

“I also worry what it means to graduate with a degree in criminology, if you’re able to lie and cheat your way into passing. The thought of many of you using your degree to find work at the NZ Police, Ministry of Justice or Department of Corrections fills me with dread.

“If you don’t engage, in even a basic way, with your course content, I am deeply concerned for the social harm you may cause,” the criminological theory lecturer said.

He then called his entire class liars and cheaters and said that the thought of them finding jobs was dreadful and they are so bad, they will cause harm.

How does he still have a job? The answer is easy,

Lecturer Lamusse is a hard left activist (he has written on how to grow the “revolutionary left”). This gives him immunity from consequences. If he was not, and identified as being on the right and send such an e-mail to an entire class, he would be suspended on the spot and out within days.

“Ti also uploads 70-plus PowerPoint slides for each lecture, and then in the lectures recites the PowerPoint slides word-for-word. Because of this, many students, including me, do not feel the need to watch the lectures, as they can get the same information from reading the PowerPoint slides,” the complainant explained.

Translation: The students don’t listen to the lectures because they are as boring as fuck, as they just recite a series of slides.

A request to interview Lamusse on September 15 was refused by the university. However, in a statement, the university said it was “aware” of the email.

“The university does not condone the approach taken by this lecturer, which is not in keeping with our institution’s values of respect, responsibility, fairness, integrity, and empathy.

“Resolution processes are under way with this staff member and the students involved,” the statement said.

This will be a wet bus ticket.

Personally I don’t think he should lose his job for being a snowflake and having a meltdown at his students. People make mistakes. But the hypocrisy is what gets me. So many others have been forced out of jobs for far less, such as writing a letter defending science!