How do you not get train tracks the right size?

The Post reports:

New tracks, same old woes for the troubled Wairarapa train line.

After years of reduced-speed trains, bus replacements, delays and general unreliability while a years-long upgrade took place – the big slow-down is back.

This time, because the newly laid tracks in Wairarapa are too narrow and causing vibrations on the train. …

Areas within a 16km section of track near Featherston were found to have been laid on average 4mm narrower. …

While the vibration issue has had no impact on the locomotives pulling the Wairarapa trains or KiwiRail’s freight locomotives and wagons, its impact on carriages means trains cannot run at their top speed and are restricted to 60kph instead of the intended 100kph.

So commuter trips are going to take twice as long because Kiwirail couldn’t measure the width properly.

And some people wonder why the Government doesn’t intend to hand over $3 billion to them for the ferry project!

Personally I think Kiwirail should be back in private hands. When the taxpayer bails you out for all your mistakes, you have far less incentive to not make them.

General Debate 27 February 2024

Non-resident ratepayers voting

Greg O’Connor has a bill to remove the vote from ratepayers who don’t reside in the district they own property in. On balance I tend to support this, but there are good arguments either way.

Liam Hehir writes:

But in any event, that’s not why we still have a ratepayer roll. It is instead justified on the basis of “no taxation without representation”. Whether landowners live in a district or not, they will be taxed there if they have land there because the taxation of land (through rates) is the primary source of income for local government. 

The link between representation and taxation is an essential principle in a democratic society. It holds that those who contribute to the financial wellbeing of a community through taxation have a right to have a say in decisions about how those funds are used. It’s a such an important bedrock principle that it is quite bizarre that, as a concept, it would rate not a single mention in the article. 

But what about “one person, one vote?” Is there an issue there? Not really.

There is no such thing as the triennial “New Zealand local election.” New Zealand has 78 different local authorities and each of them is a discrete body politic. They hold their own elections in their own jurisdictions. 

No person can vote more than once in any such election. The real question is who should participate in each election.

If that violates the principle of one person, one vote then we have real trouble. 

Consider, for instance, that New Zealand citizens residing in the UK are permitted to vote in both New Zealand’s general elections and the UK’s general election. Parents with children attending two different schools can cast a vote in the school board elections of both. 

Yet nobody seriously argues against these as violations of democracy, which raises the question of why the ratepayer roll system should be viewed differently. At the very least, these considerations illustrate that the issue is at least somewhat complex. 

I have sympathy for the notion that ratepayers should get a vote even if they don’t reside there, but against that is the argument it is those who live in an area and have to live with the decisions about roads, parks, libraries etc who who should vote only. You can argue either way win good faith.

It is important to note that the number of non-resident ratepayers on local electoral rolls is very small. According to data from DIA which LGNZ kindly shared with me, here is the data for 2022:

  • Residential electors 3,361,906
  • Ratepayer electors 7,164 or 0.21% of residential electors
  • Residential voters 1,324,599
  • Ratepayer voters 5,818 or 0.44% of residential voters

So it is unlikely in most cases that the removal of ratepayer electors would impact election results.

It does vary by TLA though. The proportion of ratepayer voters to residential voters is highest for:

  • Thames-Coromandel 8.8%
  • Mackenzie 5.2%
  • Kaipara 3.2%

I hope the bill passes first reading at least, as it would be good to have a select committee process to hear about the pros and cons of keeping ratepayer electors.

A lenient sentence

Stuff reports:

Far right activist, Kyle Chapman, has avoided jail after he was found with a banned gun and unlawfully possessed ammunition.

In the Christchurch District Court on Tuesday Judge Tom Gilbert sentenced Chapman to community detention with supervision after he was charged with unlawfully possessing over 130 rounds of ammunition, having several magazines and the possession of a Norinco semi-automatic rifle – a gun which is banned in New Zealand.

Chapman is a neo-nazi. As in an actual neo-nazi, not just the term some on the left use for anyone to the right of them. He once firebombed a marae. He is definitely not someone you want armed, let alone with a banned semi-automatic.

Judge Gilbert told the court that Chapman’s daughters said he had given up his “preoccupation with various causes which is a relief to them”. …

Judge Gilbert said the pre sentence report explained Chapman had decided to give away activist activities and “focus primarily on your family”.

“Ordinarily I’d be somewhat skeptical about those comments but the material I’ve read and the report and various letters does suggest that is actually what has happened – though time will ultimately tell,” he said.

He sentenced Chapman to six months of home detention with supervision.

I hope the daughters are correct, but I think it is somewhat naive.

In 2009 he said he was giving up on the far-right when his partner left him. He didn’t.

In 2019 he said he was turning his back on them, to focus on faith and family. He didn’t.

Nate Silver on Biden

Nate Silver makes a strong case for why ignoring Biden;’s age could lose the Democrats the White House. He points out:

  • Biden’s approval rating remains below 40%
  • Trump leads Biden in the polls in all major swing states
  • Despite the improving economy, Biden’s numbers are not improving
  • It is reasonable for voters to see the fact that Biden would be 86 years old by the end of his second term as disqualifying and the fact that Trump also has a number of disqualifying features is not a good reason to nominate Biden
  • Someone who can’t sit through a Super Bowl interview isn’t someone the public can trust to have the physical and mental stamina to handle an international crisis, terrorist attack or some other unforseen threat
  • Biden has done fewer interviews than any recent president, and it’s not close. By this point in their presidencies, Barack Obama had given more than 400 interviews and Trump had given more than 300. Biden has given fewer than 100
  • Since taking office, he has not done a single interview with reporters from a major newspaper
  • To restore confidence, Biden should do four lengthy sitdown interviews with “non-friendly” sources. “Non-friendly” doesn’t mean hostile: nonpartisan reporters with a track record of asking tough questions would work great. 
  • If he can’t, it’s awfully audacious to ask Americans to make him president for another four years.

Biden is now at only 28% in the betting markets to win re-election. He might do it if Trump implodes, but that is a hell of a risky strategy. He needs to show he is up to the job, or get out of the way.

General Debate 26 February 2024

Meet Wellington’s latest heritage building

This is not a joke. This has honestly been classified as a heritage building that needs protection.

The Spinoff reports:

Wellington’s independent hearing panel this week recommended a former British Imperial Oil storage tank in Miramar should receive heritage protection in the District Plan. Wellington city council’s heritage evaluators found the tank had value as “an increasingly rare representative example of bulk storage tanks erected nationally in the 1920s”.

It’s an effing bulk storage tank. What’s next. They’ll decide that a power pylon is a heritage building.

The company wanted to build facilities for 150 new crew members, and the gas tank site was the only suitable location he had found. “Providing the heritage listing would make the situation significantly more difficult, including making our ability to increase employment in Miramar more problematic,” he said. 

So we have a choice of a rusting storage tank or facilities for 150 crew members, and WCC has gone with the storage tank.

The solution here is to take away the ability of authorities to destroy the value in buildings owned by others by declaring them heritage. Just give the heritage authority a budget of say $25 million a year and they can use that to buy anything they thinks needs protecting. I’m pretty sure a rusty tank wouldn’t then make the list.

A Year on the Recommendations still stand.

The following is a slightly edited version that a group of high quality educators and myself compiled.

They remain relevant as National currently drags the chain.

My Proposals (with respect to many sources)

1)     A Crown Agency for “Parenting” to provide information to make New Zealand the very best parenting country on the planet.

–      Including “Project 5.75”: Ubiquitous education and support for pregnant women/partners re care for their child in-utero. Huge information/support programmes to counter FASD and other harms.

Massive parents as first (and most important) leaners and teachers programme age 0 to 5. Including health, reading, numeracy, movement, music, languages. See David Eagleman: The Brain e.g. “If developing brains are not given the proper. “expected” environment – one in which a child is nurtured and looked after – the brain will struggle to develop normally. … Without an environment with emotional care and cognitive stimulation, the human brain cannot develop normally …. The brain can often recover, to varying degrees, once the children are removed to a safe and loving environment. The younger a child is removed, the better his recovery.”

Language in the home is absolutely key. Many, many words and conversations and words that are positive!

Information and encouragement for parents to remain fully invested in the education of their children throughout the schooling year.

2)     Split the collective contract in two and super-fund/incentivise teaching in Decile 1 – 4 schools. Super-fund the decile 1-4 schools from Year 1 – 13. Provide Principals in those schools with a Business Manager to take care of resourcing, contracts, etc – allowing them to fully focus on academics. Trust these Principals with significant incentive payments to attract and keep great teachers. Limit class size to 15. Help the families – provide uniform, stationery and IT and don’t ask for donations. Make every year urgent in these schools but also have a 19 year plan so that by the end of that these young people, who will go on to parent the next generation have education levels, that don’t offer up an excuse for our school system. The secondary teacher shortage is qualitative as well as quantitative. To attract great degree graduates and second career people they must be paid to train as it is no longer tenable to have them without a year of income in a high employment economy and with so many international opportunities.

3)     Emphasise inputs:

–      Simplify the NZ curriculum (and dump the current “refresh”). Align it with the international highest standards.

–       Attendance, retention until at least 17yo, parental engagement. Make this data publicly available in real time. There is no possible justification for the attendance data to be voluntary and for the national statistics to take up to four months to be made available

–      Purpose, inspiration and role modelling is vital.

–      Teacher quality is hugely important. Emphasise it, incentivise it, talk about it always – not just as one person compared to another but in terms of each teacher becoming better by the day.

–      “Movement is medicine” physical fitness and activity is a huge part of human development and oxygen feeds the brain.

4)     Be honest about results but also provide the value added/progression measures. It is not that difficult. We are about to publish a “league table” that covers metrics for every high school. It is not “name and shame”. It is to provide information to every tax-payer, parent, Principal, BoTs, teacher, etc – about the inputs and outcomes of every secondar school. On that basis they can make their decisions.

5)     Rename UE. Too many Principals/teachers use it as an excuse when they state – “University does not suit our [BROWN] kids”. Keep the purpose of the qualification but elevate it as the true level of high-school graduation and extract the excuse aspect. Possible NCEA* would work.

Achievement gaps between rich and poor exist throughout the school system, but are widest at tertiary level. For example, at NCEA Level 2 there is a seven percentage point lag between the pass rates of low- and high-decile students, by the time pupils take University Entrance, that grows to 44 points. Similarly, while only 17 per cent of low-decile students go to university, 50 per cent of for high-decile students do.

The largest chasm, however, is in second-year university courses with limited numbers and high entry thresholds – degrees which also lead to the highest salaries.

Data sourced from six universities shows while 60 per cent of the almost 16,000 students accepted into professional law, medicine and engineering in the past five years came from the richest third of homes, just 6 per cent came from the poorest third.

If you only include decile one schools – the most disadvantaged – that figure drops to just 1 per cent.

For example, Victoria law school took just eight decile one students. Otago law took three. And of 2000 total entrants, Canterbury engineering took just a single decile one student in five years.

(https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/want-to-be-a-doctor-lawyer-or-engineer-dont-grow-up-poor/YLNUCK7L3KLN5EYJBFAEPJHCE4/)

6)     Have a superb Partnership and/or Designated Character School policy/process to allow for schools to develop that suit the non-cooker cutter kids. Make approval independent of the “network” and aside from Ministry officials.

7)     Drain the swamp. The Ministry of Education has gone from 2,900 to 4,000 bureaucrats in the last three years. This has been inversely related to school achievement. We only have 420 high schools and many of those are only semi-relevant to the Ministry being Private, State Integrated or DCS. The Ministry must get out of the way of success. Find the right people to lead the Ministry, the current leaders are simply not competent, and fully repurpose it towards actually serving the sector effectively and with accountability.

8)     Deal quickly and effectively with the Union demands after the next election. They offer nothing helpful to the dialogue so throw them a bone and walk on.

9)     Have input and achievement goals for every high school (approx. 410 – negotiated for improvement every year and fully available to the communities and nation.

10)  Mimic Success. Work out the schools in each EQI range that is excelling and make them “lighthouse schools”. Manukura, St Paul’s Ponsonby, McAuley High School, etc.

11)   Encourage public discourse from all of our school Principals. I was told by a Deputy Secretary of the Ministry of Education that their main priority was to “protect the Minister”. That is abject nonsense. There is so much IP and experience help by our 2,600 Principals. Encourage them to express their views. From Matthew Syed in his outstanding book Black Box Thinking:

“Studies have shown that we are often so worried about failure that we create vague goals, so that nobody can point the finger when we don’t achieve them. We come up with face-saving excuses, even before we have attempted anything.

We cover up mistakes, not only to protect ourselves from others, but to protect us from ourselves. Experiments have demonstrated that we all have a sophisticated ability to delete failures from memory, like editors cutting gaffes from a film reel—as we’ll see. Far from learning from mistakes, we edit them out of the official autobiographies we all keep in our own heads.

Everything we know in aviation, every rule in the rule book, every procedure we have, we know because someone somewhere died. We have purchased at great cost, lessons literally bought with blood that we have to preserve as institutional knowledge and pass on to succeeding generations. We cannot have the moral failure of forgetting these lessons and have to relearn them.”

12. Move away from the “stop kids falling through the cracks” mentality (recent Tinetti, Sio, Davis). If you don’t fall through the cracks you are still on the ground floor.

NZ kids need aspiration, and they lead to have leaders! It is the best time ever to grow up and this should be the Da Vinci generation. They have to be led out of the fog of fear.

We need to respect and love intelligence as much as brawn. If the All Black coach loses a game or two the nation goes nuts. The Minister and Secretary of Education can oversee HUGE systemic failure and very few appear to give a big rat’s backside.

13. Provide high quality afterschool care in keeping with Harlem Children’s Zone who look after all children from 7am – to 7pm (when needed).

I have watched my cat Small – bring up three kittens over that last 3 months. She has been BRILLIANT! Why do humans struggle?

Alwyn Poole
Innovative Education Consultants
www.innovativeeducation.co.nz
alwynpoole.substack.com
www.linkedin.com/in/alwyn-poole-16b02151/
www.wood2water.co.nz
www.russellinfo.co.nz

Beware the Rainbow Serpent

News.com.au reports:

A Western Australian man is facing a hefty fine and potential jail time under the state’s cultural heritage laws for allegedly disrupting the rainbow serpent after building a bridge over a creek on his property. …

Mr Maddox was charged under the unamended 1972 laws for building a creek crossing on his property, which the prosecution claimed had disrupted Waugul — a rainbow serpent central to mythology for Noongar people — as he removed a large amount of silt from the creek, Sky News Australia reported.

I look forward to the Rainbow Serpent appearing as a witness for the prosecution.

$100,000 for begging is pretty good

The Herald reports:

A Rotorua beggar says being hit by a car and charged in court won’t deter her as she makes up to $300 a day. She says local “streeties” are dealing with groups of beggars from out of town on their “turf”. Authorities say they are cracking down amid safety fears and reports of beggars operating in syndicates and making $400 a day. The city has a “generous” reputation but a prominent businessman is urging locals to stop giving. Kelly Makiha reports.

Organised begging gangs are believed to be travelling to Rotorua because the city has become known as “generous” to the homeless – with some boasting they can make up to $400 a day.

It has prompted local homeless people to ask them to move from their turf.

$400 a day is over $100,000 a year, if you assume they take weekends off.

General Debate 25 February 2024

Guest Post: “When we bring Hitler back…”

A guest post by Kara Isaac:

“Hey Jew Jew.” The words came from the 12-year-old boy standing in front of my son as they lined up at school waiting for their turn at a game. “When we bring Hitler back we’re going to kill you twice.”

They were dropped with casual disdain and a smirk. The same kind of smirk he had used the week before when the teacher stepped out of the classroom and he took the opportunity to do a Nazi salute with an accompanying “Heil Hitler!” 

My son came home angry and in tears. Trying to figure out why anyone would wish him dead just because they thought he was Jewish. 

He’s not, as it so happens. But it’s not the first time this has happened. People assuming from a combination of names and dark brown hair and dark brown eyes that we are. 

On one side my children have as their heritage a great grandmother who grew up under the jackboot of Hitler in WWII Germany and subsequently fled East Germany in the middle of the night with only what she could carry after her family was dobbed in to the Stasi. The land that had been in her family for generations appropriated by the Russians as punishment for her father’s alleged sin of being anti-communist.

Then there’s her husband, my son’s great grandfather, who was a Resistance leader in WWII Norway. And another great grandfather who fought for New Zealand against Hitler’s forces in Africa.

On the other side my children are descended from Assyrian refugees from Iraq in the 1960s. An Assyrian minority in an Arab majority. A Christian minority in a Muslim majority. Not a recipe for a long or free life in Iraq under the Ba’ath party and the rising star of Saddam Hussein.

The UNHCR sent my father-in-law’s family to Sydney. The surname Isaac a gift from an Australian immigration official who took exception to the Assyrian tradition of naming males six generations of the male family line. 

So my son, while not Jewish, has grown up knowing his heritage of people forced to flee their homelands of generations. A few among the millions of others who have gone before them and come after. The victims of war and displacement and geopolitics and post-war agreements and bureaucrats across oceans drawing lines on maps about landscapes and people groups they know nothing about, and care even less. 

My first realization that anti-Semitism still lurked ugly and under the surface was when he was born. An older extended relative reacted strongly when told his name. “My G-d,” he exclaimed in horror. “What if the kids in the playground think he’s a little Jew?!” 

And here we are in Wellington in 2023. Finding out. 

Turns out that today in some playgrounds, some kids, if they think your kid is a “little Jew” hold the view that Hitler had the right idea. And he’s not alone. He was just young enough and foolish enough to say the quiet part out loud and more bluntly than most. 

Many of the people who insist that words they don’t like are literal violence and that selling cigarettes is systemic genocide, also believe that when it comes to Jews and Israeli civilians that: violence is merely resistance, torture is liberation, burning families alive in their homes is an act of decolonization, and that a terrorist organization with literal genocide in its charter is just misunderstood.

#BelieveWomen and #MeToo don’t apply to Israeli women with slit Achilles tendons so they can’t run, or shattered pelvises, or bodies with their underwear shredded and legs broken, or women disemboweled internally via their vaginal canal. Hence the resounding silence from organisations like UN Women who, two months later, still can’t bring themselves to name and condemn the sadistic rape of Israeli women and girls. Because acknowledging mass gang rape by Hamas terrorists is somehow more deeply inconvenient to the oppressor-oppressed narrative in a way that cutting a little girl’s hand off and leaving her to bleed slowly to death waiting for help isn’t. 

All of these things if you tilt your head to the left, embrace some historical illiteracy and indulge in a touch of moral relativism are now justifiable when it comes to Israel and ordinary families getting ready for their morning Shabbat meal, or young people at a dance party for peace, in large part because of the so-called ‘right to return’. 

A “right” that exists nowhere else for any other displaced people.

When my grandmother fled East Germany and our family land was stolen no one talked about our right to return. Not our family, not any government, and certainly not a UN agency currently dedicated to keeping millions of people through multiple generations in poverty as refugees.

The people marching in the streets over the last two months chanting “From the River to the Sea” and citing the 1948 Nakba, in which 750,000 Palestinian-Arabs were expelled or fled their homes in Israel as a result of the Arab-Israeli war (which started when forces from Egypt, Transjordan, Syria and Iraq declared war and invaded Israel the day after it was created), don’t like facts. They don’t like that there could have been Palestinian and Israeli states co-existing side by side for the last 75 years if one and its friends hadn’t invaded the other the day it came into existence because their hatred of Jews was more important than having their own state. It is not uncommon that when you start a war that you then lose, you lose land (see: pretty much every other war in history).

Here in NZ our morally virtuous marchers seem to have nothing to say about the 12-14 million ethnic Germans who were expelled from their homes in Eastern and Central Europe between 1944 and 1950 when the Allies and their friends carved up Europe between them after WWII. What about them, Chloe? Marama? If we’re going to pick on 1948 let’s talk about all of the people who were displaced from their homelands that year and march in the streets for their right to return.

If the world is a bit too big, if ethnic Germans are a bit too white and a bit too difficult to categorise shall we just focus in on the Middle East and Africa? 

Shall we talk about the massive ethnic cleansing and expulsion of Jews that went on in neighbouring and nearby countries at a similar time? How about Algeria that went from having approximately 140,000 Jews in the 1940s to approximately 200 today? Or Morocco that had approximately 265,000 Jews in the 1940s and has approximately 2,000 today? Or how about my father-in-law’s country, Iraq. At the turn of the 20th century it was estimated that 40% of the population of Baghdad was Jewish. Today, it’s 4. Not 4%. 4 people. 

All up roughly 900,000 Jews are estimated to have been expelled, fled, or immigrated from Muslim-majority African and Middle Eastern countries leaving their homes and assets behind. Of these approximately 650,000 ended up in Israel.  

So since you’re out marching, Chloe and Ricardo, where are your placards and slogans for the right of return for them and their children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren to the homelands they were expelled from or fled? For them to get their houses and their assets back? 

Or do they not count because they’re Jews? 

And so you choose the side of an Islamist authoritarian terrorist government that subjugates women, executes their political opponents, stands by while their followers drop gay people off buildings, uses civilians as human shields, and steals billions of dollars in aid money meant for infrastructure and food and medicine from their people to fund rockets and terror, and to line their own pockets.

Oh and kills babies, children and Holocaust survivors. Because nothing says oppressed fighting back against the nasty colonisers quite like deliberately targeting, torturing, and massacring defenceless children.

Back in Wellington, perhaps it is hardly surprising that we now have children embracing bringing Hitler back in the schoolyard when even some of our politicians have no room for facts, humanity or nuance when it interferes with their pre-determined narrative.

UK left call countryside racist

Former UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman writes:

I was somewhat surprised to read last week that, according to the Wildlife and Countryside Link charity, the countryside is systemically racist and is an environment feared to be “dominated by white people”.

I can’t recall worrying about “colonial legacies framing nature as a white space” while riding horses in the Brecon Beacons. Nor were we fighting racism while hiking in the Lake District. We were more interested in finding the best pub lunch.

To claim that the countryside is racist is one of the most ridiculous examples of Left-wing identity politics. It’s a symptom of a deeper problem within our society – the urge to constantly view everything through the lens of race or gender, plead victimhood and point the finger at an oppressor. Whether it’s the patriarchy, or colonial masters, this desperation to divide society is ripping through our institutions, creating a culture of fear and self-censorship.

Identity politics is the enemy of tolerance.

Secondly, my own experience tells a very different story. Since my childhood, my family and I have spent countless holidays camping, fruit-picking, hiking and getting lost in blizzards. My parents took up camping in the 1980s for practical reasons: money was tight and it was cheap, child-friendly and we could take the dog. Every summer we would pile the car boot full of sleeping bags and gas canisters and head outdoors. 

It made such a refreshing change to London and we’d always come home with new friends and lots of stories. Not once in 30 years did we experience hostility. If anything, on the rare occasion that I’ve experienced racism – the crass street-level type – I’ve been in the city, never in the sticks.

Regarding rural areas as racist is in itself a type of prejudice.

Lastly, this is not just wrong but dangerous. We need to stop making white people feel guilty for being white. Critical race theory, white privilege and unconscious bias should be constantly debunked as Left-wing militancy. It’s wholly disempowering for ethnic minorities to be judged by skin colour rather than by character.

Why cast me as a victim and rob me of my agency? Why foster resentment? The truth is that so many people are terrified to challenge this groupthink which is taking over our country. They’re scared of being labelled racist and losing their job. Best just keep your head down, they think. But we cannot become self-censured identikit automatons who parrot the same Orwellian newspeak.

The Prime Minister of the UK is Hindu. The First Minister of Scotland is Muslim. The UK is in fact a great example of a society that generally doesn’t judge you by your skin colour, race or religion.

A billion dollar stadium is unaffordable

The Herald reports:

The journey towards a definitive solution to Auckland’s stadium issues has moved a step forward, after a series of presentations to a council working group in December last year.

The panel, set up in September 2023 by Mayor Wayne Brown, is tasked with finding the best long-term option for a main stadium in the city and then making a non-binding recommendation to the wider council. The working group are scheduled to meet in the next month before forwarding its recommendations to the council by the end of March. The governing body are expected to vote on the preferred stadium option around April-May.

It’s believed that two of the downtown options were priced at just over $1 billion, with a third considerably more. Eden Park’s cost for its ambitious renovation was about $850 million. Mayor Brown has already instructed that minimal ratepayer funds will be available and the central Government has yet to commit.

If it is funded by the private sector, then any of the non Eden Park options looks great. But my suspicion is that all the proposals will be dependent on ratepayers underwriting a billion dollar stadium – and that should not happen.

General Debate 24 February 2024

Stunning migration stats

Two massively different stories.

The number of NZ citizens leaving New Zealand is at a record high. Has reached 47,350 which is almost 1,000 a week.

While net migration of non-citizens is at 179,040 which is around twice the previous high.

A good summary of Three Waters

Grant Duncan writes:

Labour’s original proposed governance structure, even if you overlook the co-governance aspect of it, was a complicated beast: it had unelected ‘representative’ bodies that appoint board-appointment committees that appoint boards that then appoint advisory panels that monitor the boards and report to the representative body. Confused? And then one asks how these boards would get along with the several local councils in their areas when needing to agree on and coordinate developments like a new suburb’s pipes or an upgraded treatment plant. Just fixing a damaged stormwater drain would get more complicated than before. There was bound to be conflict. And the households dependent on these services would have less voice than ever.

This gets to the heart of it – there would be not accountability.

Mr Hipkins has said, somewhat defensively, that National still ‘have to find a way of recognising the Māori interest in water which has been established by the courts’. We’ll see what the new government does about that, but Mr Hipkins must know that parliaments make laws and courts apply them, not the other way around. In the meantime, people of all races just want a clean glass of water, please.

Three Waters helped to sink the Labour government at the 2023 election. Setting aside the ‘race card’ accusation, their proposed governance structure was unwieldy and full of opportunities for bureaucratic delay and conflict. It was another own goal by the Labour team as one more ‘solution’ turned into one more political problem.

I have no doubt it would have added massive costs to the supply of water.

According to Hipkins, those who question that multi-level model are ‘playing the race card’. Someone needs to tell him that what people really need is clean water in and dirty water out. No wonder Labour loses support over this. Public utilities such as water services should be matters on which a Labour party leads – not loses.

It was a self-inflicted own goal.

Industry bodies should not compel Treaty worship

Hobson’s Pledge report:

Janet is a dedicated real estate agent with more than 30 years experience, but the Real Estate Authority is threatening to cancel her licence for five years. Why? Because Janet is taking a principled stance in refusing to complete an online training course instructing real estate agents on te reo Māori, tikanga, and the Treaty of Waitangi.

Her refusal is based on concerns that an industry body can force members to complete training on a subject only very peripherally connected to their job under threat of losing their right to work. It is also a key concern to Janet that the online training course Te Kākano is a singular perspective of the subject matter when there is much variance in opinion and understanding within iwi, Māoridom, and New Zealanders.

This is a matter of personal and professional autonomy and diversity of opinion.

Janet is seeking to challenge REA’s power to impose compulsory courses via a judicial review in the High Court. The review could serve as a critical tool in addressing the overreach by other professional organisations who force diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training on workers via mandates.

Many industry bodies are doing this, using their regulatory power to enforce compulsory education of a particular viewpoint on their members.

Frankly any industry body that does this should lose their legislative authority to regulate their industry and have their functions handed over to a new organisation who will not try to politically indoctrinate their members.

General Debate 23 February 2024

Why did ratepayers pay for the dinner?

The Post reports:

Wellington City Council treated the multi-millionaire bosses of Reading Cinema to a lavish dinner, with almost a quarter of the bill for booze.

The Post revealed in November how sisters Ellen and Margaret Cotter, who head the family’s entertainment and real estate empire, flew to the Capital to meet secretly with new mayor Tory Whanau and council chief executive Barbara McKerrow.

The upshot was a controversial $32m deal for the cash-strapped councilto buy the land under the vacant complex on Courtenay Place and lease it back to Reading for 21 years. …

Including Whanau, McKerrow and infrastructure head Siobhan Proctor, eight council representatives made up the party of 10. Ellen Cotter is Reading chief executive and president, and Margaret is the company’s board chairperson.

They dined on a $95 seasonal set menu, a $78 bottle of Pinot Gris, two bottles of Pinot Noir totalling $145, a $62 bottle of Chardonnay, two glasses of Viognier, and two lagers.

The total bill came to $1394.30, roughly equivalent to four months of rates for the average ratepayer.

The cost of the dinner is not excessive. $1,400 for a dinner of 10 at a nice establishment such as Ortega is actually quite unreasonable.

What is unreasonable is why the Council (ratepayers) were paying at all? Was offering the US millionairres $32 million corporate welfare not enough, that we had to throw the dinner in also?

The Reading Cinema owners should be the ones shouting the dinner for their relief they’d found a Council stupid enough to bail them out.

Media plead for Parliament to legalise theft

Stuff reports:

Sinead Boucher, executive chair and publisher of Stuff, and Joanna Norris, managing director of masthead publishing also spoke in support of the Bill. 

Stuff was the second most searched term on Google last year after weather and news, Boucher said. 

It is one of the biggest media companies in NZ and employs hundreds of journalists and “other staff who live and work in the towns they cover”.

“Even if someone never reads a single story … they’d benefit from the impact of good journalism, helping keep the company our country free of corruption and our societies healthy and our ability to continue to do this is in great peril.”

Journalism is in a fight for its life, she said. 

“[Big tech] companies are squeezing us out, but using our own work to do so.”

She warned AI was creating what looked like “an extinction-level event” for news media.

The media asking for a tax on Google and Facebook to fund them reminds me of the late 1990s when the music industry said they were facing extinction and demanded a tax on blank DVDs to fund them. Then they demanded a tax on ISPs.

Today the music industry is thriving as new business models eventually emerged.

The legacy media seems to regard advertising as belonging to them. Advertisers are choosing to advertise on FB and Google because they are much better at targeting. You can make sure you pay only to have your ad seen by say women aged 21 to 35 in Palmerston North etc.

What the NZ media are demanding is what has been done in Canada. It is a tax on linking. The result was Google and Facebook blocked people from being able to share news links and guess who this hurt the most? The media. In fact the Government has had to bail them out. The reality is the media gain far more from people being able to find their stories on Facebook and Google, than those companies gain from it.

Business journalist Matt Nippert gets it.

The Government should not consider advancing Labour’s bill in any way.

Eric Crampton has a good summary of what a disaster it was in Canada.

Public servant sacked for leaking

The Ministry of Health reports:

Following the leak of confidential Ministry information to an external third party last month, the Ministry of Health began an investigation to determine how this occurred.

We can now confirm that the individual responsible has been identified and no longer works at the Ministry.

It is good to see some action, but why has the individual not been identified, or at least their seniority? Was this a 21 year old intern or a senior manager?

Labour’s great success with child poverty

The 2023 child poverty statistics are out, and they show slightly more children living in material hardship than in 2017. So six years of Ardern, Hipkins and Robertson saw no actual progress, while four years of Key, English and Joyce saw 60,000 fewer kids living in material hardship.

This is all data from Stats NZ.

No Government achieved less than the last one.

The Auditor-General is dead right

NewstalkZB reports:

New Zealand’s Auditor-General has spoken out against Government agencies, claiming their reporting produces ‘a lot of rubbish’.

John Ryan told the Finance Select Committee that agencies like to tick off ‘project milestones’, but their actual accomplishments are ‘questionable’.

He says the general public doesn’t get to see or experience the outcomes of these reported milestones.

“The public really wants to know what outcomes they’re getting from these projects, not whether they’re managing it on a day-to-day basis. That’s much more than management activity.”

Government needs to be about outcomes, not outputs or even worse inputs.

We did have a Government heading that way under Key and English. They had outcome based targets for Better Public Services. But the Ardern Government got rid of these, and instead focused on how much money they could spend, instead of what that money achieved.

“Education in New Zealand – Aspiration needs to come from the top”

That is the headline I wholeheartedly believe in a piece I had published on ZB+ yesterday. While it is behind their subscriber service I can be brief here:

Given Erica Stanford’s performance in opposition as spokesperson for Education was stunned and dismayed by this answer she gave recently in the House to former Minister Jan Tinetti.  

“As schools start back for 2024, there will be a relentless focus on lifting student achievement. This Government’s ambitious target of getting 80 per cent of our tamariki to curriculum by the time they finish intermediate by 2030 is our North Star.”

What the minister has clearly stated is that she and the new National government only believe they are capable of improving education in New Zealand over six years to still have one in five Year 8 students failing at basic literacy and numeracy. That is despite each New Zealand child receiving 9600 hours of funded education in eight years of schooling. Her answer is dripping with pessimism and lack of ambition.

If we are truly aiming at a “world class” teaching profession and education system, why do we have a self-imposed limit that we can only get 80 per cent of students even to a moderate level of ability and achievement?

The Minister likes to use the term “Science of Learning”. From her answer in the House she has a lot more to do to understand the true implications of the potential of every human from this field of work. Through looking at the work of people like Carol Dweck, David Eagleman and many more. The following statement should be the government’s “North Star”.

It is not only possible to lift every child – it is imperative. I have seen it done with the right provision.

If the Minister is not highly ambitious – it will be very hard for the sector to be – let alone the students and families.

Alwyn Poole
Innovative Education Consultants
www.innovativeeducation.co.nz
www.alwynpoole.substack.com
www.linkedin.com/in/alwyn-poole-16b02151/