General Debate 17 November 2020

Cunliffe is right

The Herald reports:

“Absolutely incompetent and absolutely staggering loss,” Cunliffe wrote on social media.

He was responding to a Herald article about the council booking $1.4b in balance sheet losses on interest-rate derivatives in the past two years after its strategy of fixing interest cost long-term backfired when interest rates fell. …

Mayor Phil Goff, who declined repeated requests by the Herald last week to discuss or justify the hedging losses and whether ratepayers were locked into now over-priced loans, did not want to lock horns with his former Labour colleague today.

Instead he issued a statement through a mayoral spokesman, saying: “Any claim that there will be ‘real’ costs to the council is factually incorrect.

The Council is paying $1,4 billion more in interest than it would otherwise have to, if it hadn’t fixed at high interest rates. That is pretty real.

Cunliffe – who Goff appointed finance spokesman when he was Labour leader from 2008 to 2011 – said: “Could there be a clearer case of a sackable offence?

“Who is resigning over it? 1400 million reasons to hang their heads in shame.”

If this was a private company and someone made a decision that cost the company $1.4 billion, I’m pretty sure they would be long gone.

Greens want sick leave changes rammed through under urgency

Stuff reports:

Labour has ruled out doubling sick leave before Christmas, despite a push from the Green Party to do so.

Green Party workplace relations spokeswoman Jan Logie said bringing forward Labour’s plan to double sick leave from five to ten days would make sure people stayed home if they had Covid-19 symptoms, keeping the whole country safer. …

“Getting this done before Christmas is critical to ensure peace of mind for businesses and workers alike. To not be able to offer extended sick leave for workers during this busy Christmas period puts us all at risk.”

So the Green Party want a law change rammed through Parliament using urgency, without even allowing affected employers to have a say on the law change.

Remember the days when they were the principled party that opposed urgency and bypassing select committees?

ACLU abandons free speech

Glenn Greenwald writes:

One of the effects of the ensuing intense controversies was that I was unable to finish an article I had been working on for months at the time: a lengthy, deeply reported examination of the internal war engulfing the ACLU, fueled by a raging conflict between its more traditional lawyers who still believe in the primacy of free speech and the need to defend it and the newer political liberal activists and lawyers who do not.

The ACLU used to be a strident defender of all speech, including speech that it detested. It now has become an organisation that is pro-censorship of speech that some people find offensive.

The same has happened in NZ with the misnamed NZ Council for Civil Liberties. Once upon a time they were defenders of free speech, but now they more often are apologists for restrictions on speech.

On Friday morning, Abigail Shrier — author of a new book exploring the rapid, massive increase in teenage girls self-identifying as trans boys and undergoing permanent gender reassignment therapies and surgeries in their teens — published an article in Quillette describing the extraordinary efforts by major corporations and various activists to prevent her book from being purchased

A taboo topic. In a sane world you should be allowed to have a view fully in support of trans people being able to undergo gender reassignment, but also have a view that some (not all) young people may not know their gender identity and could conflate it with their sexual orientation.

The recent protest by Spotify employees over Joe Rogan’s podcast was triggered in large part by his decision to invite Shrier onto his program. Many liberal employees inside the streaming service demanded this episode be removed. “Many LGBTQAI+/ally Spotifiers feel unwelcome and alienated because of leadership’s response in [Rogan’s] conversations,” was one of the questions posed to Spotify’s CEO at a tense staff-wide meeting, along with a demand to know why that program had not been deleted from the platform. 

Note that what is being discussed here are not efforts to criticize or protest Shrier and her book. Nobody disputes such criticisms would be appropriate. It is much more extreme than that: an effort to prevent others from hearing her views in her book — i.e., censorship: not state censorship, but corporate censorship.

Exactly. If Shrier is wrong, then tell us why. Instead though there is a concerted effort to prevent people from being able to access her book.

But for numerous reasons, the ACLU — still with some noble and steadfast dissenters — is fast transforming into a standard liberal activist group at the expense of the free speech and due process principles it once existed to defend. Those reasons include changing cultural mores, an abandonment by millennials and Gen Z activists of the long-standing leftist belief in free speech and replaced by demands that views they dislike be silenced (which in turn causes Gen X and Boomer managers and editors fearful of losing their jobs or being vilified to succumb to this authoritarianism)

This is why I eventually joined the Free Speech Coalition. Groups like the NZCCL and the Human Rights Commission only defend speech they agree with. You need a group that will defend speech they vehemently disagree with.

I know that the legal and cultural assault on trans people is very real, and fervently believe trans people have the absolute right to full legal protection of and respect for their identities (Shrier herself has repeatedly said she also believes this: “I fully support medical transition for mature adults,” she wrote in her Quillette article).

But the question of whether young teens are being misdiagnosed with gender dysphoria, and at what age they are capable of making choices to permanently alter their bodies and identities, is of course a question society is exploring and should be able to explore in good faith without being demonized as bigots.

Exactly.

Not many things I agree with Glenn Greenwald on, but this is one of them.

UPDATE: Also worth reading this post on Medium about autism and transgender. It was published on Medium as it was effectively blackballed elsewhere.

Disgraceful

Stuff reports:

Victoria University of Wellington says it may consider financial compensation for victims of Jack Body, a former lecturer and famed composer alleged to have sexually coerced, stupefied and abused male students over decades.

The university’s plan for redress, which it hopes will be co-designed by the survivors, comes as new allegations surface from former students of Victoria University’s New Zealand School of Music.

Body died in 2015, a week after being awarded Arts Icon status, one of the highest honours in the New Zealand arts world. But after the university asked alumni of its New Zealand School of Music to donate to a memorial fund in his name, a number of them opted to speak out.

They told a Stuff investigation that Body got students drunk in his home and asked them to take their clothes off for photo shoots, and, in one case, sexually assaulted a student during an assessment meeting on campus.

Credit to Vic for stepping up. Less credit to others though:

A post by RNZ Concert presenter Nick Tipping on Facebook drew dozens of comments, including some by the deputy chair of industry body Sounz, Eve de Castro-Robinson​, who claimed the allegations came from “those with a strong agenda against Jack” and that the investigation was a “witch hunt” and “sensationalist clickbait”.

If someone rapes you, I guess you can be considered to have a strong agenda against that person.

But in another post, de Castro-Robinson admitted she had known Body “crossed boundaries”.

“We all knew it was happening to different extents. I warned Jack against compromising himself with students myself, years ago. Any of us in Academia know the rules of conduct.

So “we all knew” and they did nothing about it because his talent with music was more important! Appalling.

“I have in no way condoned the behavior [sic] nor disbelieved those in the article, merely pointed out the correct channel for this sort of thing is through a proper complaints procedure rather than for a journo to splash unproven, unsubstantiated allegations concerning a dead man on popular media.”

There is no proper complaints procedure if your rapist is dead.

And if those assaulted by him had spoken up earlier, then there would be fewer victims.

Sounz executive director Diana Marsh this week sought to distance the organisation from de Castro-Robinson’s comments, saying they “in no way reflect our views as an organisation”.

Is she still the deputy chair?

De Castro-Robinson declined to be interviewed but released a statement, including an apology.

“I reacted with my personal response. The late Jack Body was a friend, colleague, and an influential figure in New Zealand contemporary classical music without peer.”

De Castro Robinson said she had “benefited enormously” from Body’s music, support and kindness, and felt compelled to protect his personal and professional legacy.

“However, any such allegations of abuse must be fully investigated, and I unreservedly condemn any form of sexual harassment or assault. I regret my comments, and if I have offended anyone, I strongly apologise for any misjudged statements.”

As apologies go, it is around a 3/10 on the apology scale. You don’t minimise it by saying “If I have offended anyone”.

How about “I let my friendship with Jack Body cloud my judgment. I apologise to all the victims of Jack Body for my comments which were wrong”

Good to see another trade deal

Newshub reports:

A lobby group concerned about a major trade deal New Zealand signed this evening says the COVID-19 pandemic provides a strong reason why such agreements should be ditched.

Why? On second thoughts, I don’t want to know. The “lobby group” is no doubt the usual collection of Marxists who just hate trade.

Leaders from all 15 countries watched via video as Ministers signed the deal: from Auckland, Trade Minister Damien O’Connor signed for New Zealand.

Speaking afterwards, he told reporters it would bring security and certainty to exporters.

One of the aims in coming years is to progressively lower tariffs across many areas.

The RCEP itself doesn’t appear to lower a single tariff. It reduces some non-tariffs barriers and may lead to lower tariffs, but by itself it doesn’t do that much. Still a worthwhile step in the right direction.

But Edward Miller, from It’s Our Future, fears New Zealanders won’t benefit.

“We’re seeing a huge secret agreement being negotiated where we don’t know what the risks are and from the economic modelling that we’ve seen there’s very little economic benefit to be gained.

“So we don’t know why the government continues to do secret deals that are against our national interests.”

Miller said there had been no effective public consultation over the deal, some parts of which attack New Zealand’s national interests.

You notice Miller provides no details. He just recites cliches.

Miller said It’s Our Future would keep pushing the government to pull out of international trade deals.

Their actual agenda – no trade deals at all. Never mind that freer trade has pulled several hundred million people out of extreme poverty. They’re still against.

The problem wasn’t us, it was everyone else!

Stuff reports:

The Labour Party have appointed long-time staffer Rob Salmond as the party’s new general-secretary.

Salmond has worked for the Labour Party in a variety of roles for many years but is best-known for his role in the Chinese-sounding names controversy.

A sensible appointment for Labour. Rob’s skills align well with what the party organisation needs.

He was working for the party’s research unit in 2015 when it attracted huge controversy by analysing the names of home-buyers in Auckland and tallying up those that “sounded” Chinese. At that time Labour was attempting to prove that overseas buyers were helping to heat up the housing market.

This caused a huge outcry at the time, and has followed around Labour MP Phil Twyford and Salmond ever since.

Salmond told Stuff that he regretted the incident and apologised to the Chinese community, albeit with some qualification.

“The important part that I regret is in helping put that together I didn’t appreciate the way that some people who didn’t share our values might interpret what we did and use it to harm members of the Chinese community,” Salmond said.

Oh that is rather precious. We did nothing wrong in blaming house prices on people with Chinese sounding surnames. The problem was other people blamed them also!

General Debate 16 November 2020

Guest Post: When the government is incompetent or distracted

A guest post by Alwyn Poole:

When the government is incompetent or distracted …

… the nation needs to step up – regardless of who will eventually take the credit.

One of my pet hates is the nonsense spoken by government politicians, of any persuasion, when they tell the people that “we have put millions/billions into such and such”. It is simply crap and we should not tolerate it. No government has any money of their own – it all belongs to the tax-payer. We should insist on accurate language. The need to say that; “we have chosen to allocate your (taxpayer) money to …”. This includes debt decisions where it should be; “we have chosen to take out loans against your future payments to do … “. Not all tax is theft but excessive tax most certainly is and I consider that we have plenty of that. Our massive bureaucracies have almost no review and accountability processes and 53 of their leaders are paid more than the Prime Minister. What are the checks of their performance and competence? Public sector salaries are climbing significantly faster that private sector ones. Big government is almost always bad government.

Although the exact words of Lincoln’s Gettysburg speech are a little disputed the sentiment has been carried through great democracies and needs to be incredibly important in our beautiful nation:

“that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom —and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

We have always considered our leaders to be benign, but our single House system is incredibly lacking in checks and balances especially when a party has a full majority and our population is, by and large, passive and accepting. Being “nice” is no qualification for leadership. Being effective and providing opportunities for people to improve their lives is. The great Douglas Adams provided a superb warning against people who aspire for political leadership:

“The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.
To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”

The Labour government cabinet is incredibly limited. I remain in genuine despair that Chris Hipkins has Education. He oversaw significant system decline in the last three years and has no idea(s). They have also failed with child poverty, housing and transport. I cannot think of an idea or indicator of how we get out of the international travel hole caused by our Covid response.

Our system – and worldwide it is the case – eliminates mavericks. How high does your tolerance for boredom need to be before you are willing to sit in Parliament under Trevor Mallard? How patient (or ambivalent to results) do you need to be to hold a Ministry and work with State sector leaders (all of whom seem to have grey as their favourite colour)?

What to do? My advice is to work 24/7 for the best of the people of the nation regardless of the government (although supporting them when they get it right). When National was in power for 9 years the education sector basically put their hands on their heads and did little to improve things while spending plenty of time and hours on opposing a trivial systemic policy in Charter Schools. National was remarkable for their lack of courage and use of political capital in many areas.

New Zealand needs good people to do good things regardless of who gets the credit. The government is ineffective and incompetent but to sit back and watch them continue to fail does no person any good. Be proactive. If you have money be philanthropic. If in business employ as many people as possible. If in education help a system that is, frankly, broken.

If you do all of this the Labour government will take the credit for efforts and may even get a third term on the back of them. So what? National did very little in 9 years … the people are far more important than the government (and the media for that matter).

Let us be the “by the people”.

Another regular guest poster

As well as having Monique Poirier I will host Alwyn Poole for a guest post every second week. He has been in Education since 1991 and, as a leader of the Villa Education Trust has been involved in challenging the system philosophically and through having Charter Schools. 

He declares no political bias and although championing free speech and a range of freedoms – holds fast to a Christian faith perspective that put ACT outside his voting range due to their euthanasia support. 

He has three children – a Auckland fire-fighter, a PhD student, and a Chemical Engineer living in Memphis who worked for the Trump life saving Regeneron before moving south to look after Alwyn’s first grand-child while daughter in law – Carolina – works for Cummins.

Alwyn promises to be thoughtful and polemic every fortnight.

Guest Post: Why I will never be an Aotearoan

A guest post by David Garrett:

I am and always have been a very proud New Zealander. Although I have little  interest in  sport, particularly rugby  – I am often unaware of when or even  who the “AB’s” are playing – a little part of me is proud that teams with “Black” or “Ferns” somewhere in their name punch well above their weight in so many sports.

It makes me feel good that New Zealanders are prominent in so many fields: the first person to split the atom; the first to climb Everest – and more importantly get down again – people at very high levels in their various fields. I am, like the late comedian John Clarke, someone whose attention is immediately drawn to the letter “Z” when reading, and immediately connects that with New Zealand, the name of our homeland.  But we are now subject to relentless social engineering aimed at changing all that.

Back in the early 1980’s when I was living in New Plymouth, and still in the oilfield, there was a push to change the name of what old Taranakians call “the Mountain” from Egmont to Taranaki. This created huge resentment among a lot of people of all ages – I was then not yet 30 – and across the political spectrum. A campaign began, of which I was part, the guts of which was that the name of the province was Taranaki, but the name of Mountain was, and always should be, Egmont.

Even back then, we all understood that Lord Egmont – after whom Cook named the Mountain – had never set foot in New Zealand, but that Egmont had been First Lord of the British Admiralty in Cook’s time. So what? That was the accepted name of the Mountain that dominates the entire province of Taranaki, as it had since Cook’s time and long before.

Long story short, a compromise was reached that the Mountain would henceforth be known officially as “Mt. Egmont/Taranaki” – in that order – and on any map printed after the mid 1980’s that is what he is called. But  all that is about to change; with no consultation with anyone, the Mountain’s name is soon to be just “Taranaki” with “Egmont” gone forever – and with it part of our English history and heritage. I deeply resent that change, and the way it is being clandestinely made. And now the same thing is happening to the name of our country – a country known throughout the world as “New Zealand”

As regular readers know, I am a long time listener to National Radio, aka “Red Radio”. Why? Well, in short, I would rather listen to Kathryn Ryan on Nine to Noon and Kim Hill on Saturday rather than to Sean Plunket talking to half educated semi-articulate idiots on talkback, and in our tiny country those are the only two “talk radio” alternatives.

Radio New Zealand – funded by your  taxes – now routinely refers to the country as “Aotearoa/New Zealand”, and frequently just “Aoteraroa”. I bristle every time I hear it. Is that because I am a racist? In short, I don’t believe so. Strictly defined, a racist is a person who believes that certain races of people are superior or inferior to others.  While to my shame I may once have believed that – at least to some degree – my time in Tonga quickly  taught me that that was simply not so; the members of all races fall on the same bell curve as every other race on any measure: some are smarter or stronger or taller or nastier or more duplicitous than others.

My opposition to the relentless pressure to change the name of the country is that it implies that Maori culture and history is the only culture and history that is of any relevance to us in this land. I categorically reject that. I agree with Don Brash, Bob Jones and others who argue that the Maori benefited enormously from British colonization, although there were without doubt some pretty  awful things done following our becoming “one people” as Governor Hobson famously proclaimed.

Although the argument results in eye rolling from people who frankly should know better, the Maori did far better out of colonization by the British rather than the others snapping at their reluctant heels such as the Spanish, the Dutch, and the French. Anyone who knows anything about 18th to 20th century history knows that the Spanish probably would have wiped the Maori out if they didn’t knuckle down – just as they did to the “Indians” everywhere else they conquered – the Dutch would have been somewhat better, and if the French had become the colonizing power, Nouvelle Zelande would almost certainly still  be a French possession, like Tahiti and New Caledonia. The Frogs have never been good at giving up possessions.

So we have a combined heritage of Maori and British cultures and history. Other than the four main cities – Nat Rad is trying to change the names of those by stealth too – I would argue that the majority of our place names  remain Maori. Respect and admiration for Maori culture – or at least some aspects of it –  has completely changed in the 50 years since Winston Peters explained away his dark skin by hinting that he was  Italian, and was thus nicknamed “Luigi” by his fellow students at Auckland law school.

Every second person now bears a Maori tattoo – often completely contrary to Maori custom: for example women’s tattoos were on their chins only, not all over their arms.  Blond haired blue eyed women on the dating site I frequent list their ethnicity as “New Zealand Maori”. We have long abandoned any “blood” qualification for Maoriness – although interestingly if you want to share in settlement moneys – particularly if you are Ngai Tahu – you’ll need a bit better claim to being a Maori than that you feel like one.

I have no problem with any of that. If a vapid blue eyed blonde haired woman wants to tattoo her chin – or her forearms – and call herself a Maori, that’s no skin off my nose. I have no problem with the resurgence of te reo – although I don’t believe Joe and Jane Taxpayer should have to pay for it. All my Tongan rellies’ kids are reasonably fluent in Tongan, and their parents don’t need taxpayer money to “protect” the Tongan language.

The bald reality is Maori lost their language because they no longer valued it, not because they were “beaten at school for speaking it” which was in any case Sir Apirana Ngata’s idea. As Minister of “Native Affairs” Ngata concluded that to succeed in the modern world, his people needed to be fluent in English, so English only was to be spoken at school, with Maori at home – just as is the case with my Tongan rellies. The fact that they were “beaten” at school for speaking it is a red herring: in the 1920’s and even right into the 70’s you got “beaten” at school for all sorts of infractions. I was regularly getting the cane before I left school in 1975.

So, I will never accept that I am a citizen of Aotearoa, or that that is the name of my country, just as for me, the volcanic cone that dominates the province of Taranaki will always be Mt Egmont. I am proud of my British heritage – in my case heavily diluted by French, which became  more problematic after 1985.  Although I have little interest in it, I am proud that Shakespeare’s literature dominates the English speaking world. I am very happy that English – after Mandarin – has become the predominant language in the world.

And here at home, I am by and large very proud of what the English brought to this country, and their recognition of the Maori as the only people they colonized to be granted the massive privilege of citizenship of Britain, enshrined in Article III of that international treaty that is actually no such thing. That citizenship, incidentally, was a direct result of Cook’s estimation of Maori as the finest “native” race he had ever come across in his peripatetic travels.

 I am proud to descend from peopIe on my paternal grandfather’s side who once ruled an empire upon which the sun never set. I am proud that my forebears won the Battle of Britain against odds of four to one – led by another famous New Zealander, Sir Keith Park of whom  Lord Tedder said “If any one man won the Battle of Britain, he did”.

So resist brothers and sisters! When someone refers to our country as “Aotearoa” don’t be afraid to speak up and say “Actually the name of our country is New Zealand”. When reference to Aotearoa  is associated with derogatory references to Cook or the British, don’t be afraid to engage; when someone at a summer BBQ spouts utter bullshit about our history, engage! Be proud of the fact that you are, like me, proud New Zealanders. And always will be.

General Debate 15 November 2020

Trump loses 232-306

Georgia has now been called for Joe Biden, and the final election result is 232 electoral college votes for Trump and 306 for Joe Biden. No amount of whining or tantrums from Trump will change the reality that he lost.

The outstanding court cases are trivial or hopeless. The remaining votes to be counted can’t change the results in any state. The margins are:

  • Arizona 10,016 votes
  • Georgia 14,172
  • Wisconsin 20,546
  • Nevada 34,547
  • Pennsylvania 63,005
  • Michigan 233,394

Trump’s own Department of Homeland Security (senior officials all appointed by him) said these elections were the most secure in American history.

Go Covid-19

Sky News reports:

Peter Sutcliffe is understood to have died at University Hospital of North Durham, three miles from where he was an inmate at Frankland prison.

He was sent there after developing COVID-19, but is understood to have refused treatment.

The 74-year-old had returned to prison after being treated for a suspected heart attack two weeks ago – but was forced to go back to hospital after testing positive for coronavirus. He had a number of health problems, including diabetes and obesity.

Finally some good from Covid-19.

Sutcliffe murdered at least 13 women, and tried to kill at least seven more.

His crime spree started when he was 23 years old and carried on for 11 more years. He was one of those individuals totally beyond redemption.

General Debate 14 November 2020

Why zoning should go

Stuff reports:

Seven houses and an imaginary line have forced a Wellington mother to make a difficult decision: send her 5-year-old daughter to a school which will not work for her needs, or fork out $16,000 a year for a private education.

The mother, who did not want to be named to protect her daughter’s privacy, said her child has sensory issues, bad enough she has to wear headphones to block out noise when she enters a cafe.

When it came time to enrol her daughter at school, she discovered she was only in-zone for a school with open-plan classrooms, with 64 children in a single space.

“Her brain won’t be able to process basic information with the noise of an open-plan classroom,” the mother said.

The family lives seven houses away from the zone for a school which has “normal” sized class.

“I’m sure we’re not the only ones, I’m sure there are plenty of other kids, and it’s not that I think one school is better than the other, it’s that one school is absolutely not suitable for our child.”

The family had appealed to the Ministry of Education to have them direct the out-of-zone school to take their daughter but their application was declined.

“We’ve been backed into a corner by the Ministry of Education, into either choosing the school which has 64 kids in one class, or going private, because of the zoning issue.

“Dealing with the ministry has been an absolute s..t show.”

Parents shouldn’t have to beg and grovel to bureaucrats in Wellington to be able to send their children to the school most suitable for them.

Zoning condemns poor kids whose families can’t afford to live in areas close to the schools they want to go to.

Government refusing legitimate OIA requests for three years

Stuff reports:

It’s about four journalists trying to do something worthwhile – to identify areas of New Zealand with low vaccination rates, and to investigate the reasons behind that.

The Ministry officials decided that releasing immunisation rates by suburb would not be useful in their view, so they denied the requests for three years.

One of their excuses was that the had the data at meshblock level (which is so small, it could potentially identify individuals) and that it would be a huge project to convert it to suburb level.

This is unadulterated crap.

Something I do a lot of is use meshblock level data and group it at a higher level such as area units, suburbs, territorial authorities, electorates etc.

It takes me less than an hour. Sometimes less than 30 minutes. It is in fact very simple to do just in Excel using a formula.

So the Ministry of Health saying this would take significant collation and research is bullshit.

Read the whole article to see how appalling the Ministry of Health’s compliance with the OIA was.

Pity the Republican lawyers

Stuff reports:

By now, it’s well established that most of the arguments put forward by US President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign in its challenge of the results of the 2020 election are baseless and highly speculative.

Even Trump allies, as The Washington Post reported, acknowledge the apparent futility of the effort.

Others have reasoned that there’s no harm in going through the motions, with one anonymous Republican official asking: “What’s the downside for humouring him” for a little while?

But as scenes in courtrooms across the country in recent days have shown, there is indeed a downside for those tasked with actually pursuing these claims. Repeatedly now, they have been rebuked by judges for how thin their arguments have been.

The most famous scene came in Pennsylvania, where a Trump lawyer strained to avoid acknowledging that their people were, in fact, allowed to observe the vote-counting process in Philadelphia.

As The Washington Post reported: “At the city’s federal courthouse on Thursday evening, attorneys for Trump asked a judge to issue an emergency order to stop the count, alleging that all Republican observers had been barred.

“Under sharp questioning from Judge Paul S Diamond, however, they conceded that Trump in fact had ‘a non-zero number of people in the room’, leaving Diamond audibly exasperated.

“‘I’m sorry, then what’s your problem?’ asked Diamond, who was appointed to the federal bench by President George W Bush. Denying Trump’s request, Diamond struck a deal for 60 observers from each party to be allowed inside.

“At one point on Friday afternoon, 12 Republican observers and five Democrats were watching the count, according to a ballot counter who was working.”

After that “non-zero” answer, Diamond pressed the Trump campaign lawyer to be more explicit – and he suggestively invoked their standing with the bar. “I’m asking you as a member of the bar of this court: Are people representing the plaintiffs in the room?” The lawyer responded more directly: “Yes.”

The lawsuits are propaganda, not actual serious litigation. They are being laughed out of courts everywhere and none of them are remotely capable of changing the result in a single state, let alone the overall result.

Another of the Trump team’s claims crumbled rather quickly in Georgia.

In Chatham County, as in Michigan, the Trump campaign cited supposed evidence that 53 late ballots might have been predated so they could be counted.

Except two witnesses they called acknowledged under oath that they didn’t know whether the ballots were received after the deadline. And two others for the local board of elections testified that they were, in fact, received on time.

Judge James Bass dismissed the case in a one-sentence, eight-word ruling, saying: “I’m denying the request and dismissing the petition” and abruptly adjourned the hearing.

He then elaborated in a written opinion: “The Court finds that there is no evidence that the ballots referenced in the petition were received after 7pm on election day, thereby making those ballots invalid. Additionally, there is no evidence that the Chatham County Board of Elections or the Chatham County Board of Registrars has failed to comply with the law.”

The common thread running through all of these is that Trump’s lawyers are regularly offering a significantly more watered-down version of Trump’s claims about rampant voter fraud – because they, unlike Trump, actually have to substantiate their claims.

And as these exchanges show, it’s a rather thankless task that can rather quickly land them on a judge’s bad side.

So not only was the claim without evidence, it was over a paltry 53 ballots.

Here’s the leads Biden has in each “contested” state:

  • Arizona 11,635
  • Georgia 14,057
  • Wisconsin 20,546
  • Nevada 36,870
  • Pennsylvania 53,244
  • Michigan 148,645

Shaw calls for policies Ardern has ruled out permanently

Stuff reports:

Green Party co-leader James Shaw says the Government needs to use the levers it has to stop further over-heating in the housing market.

He said these levers could be taxes on capital gains and wealth.

His comments are either stupid or naive, or both.

Jacinda Ardern has ruled out both a CGT and a wealth tax – permanently. Not just in this term, but for so long as she is Prime Minister.

So calling on something that you have a 0.000% chance of achieving is stupid. Focus on things you can possibly acheive.

So long as the Government and councils artificially restrict land supply for housing and the Reserve Bank is printing money like they were Social Credit on steroids, house prices will keep rising.

General Debate 13 November 2020

Words worth remembering

On 9/11 Heather Penney was 26 years old. She was a pilot with the 121st Fighter Squadron in Washington DC. She was ordered to intercept and down United Flight 93 before it could reach DC and crash into a target.

Due to the urgency of the mission, there was no time to arm the plane. So she took off with her mission being to ram her plane into a jumbo jet, almost certainly killing herself also. It didn’t prove necessary as the brave passengers fought back against the hijackers and the plane crashed.

Penney was asked why she was willing to fly a kamikaze mission. Her reply is worth reflecting on:

Why? Because there are things in this world that are more important than ourselves. Freedom. The Constitution of the United States. Our way of life. Mom, baseball, apple pie; these things and so many more that make us uniquely American. We belong to something greater than ourselves. As complex and diverse and discordant as it is, this thing, this idea called America, binds us together in citizenship and community and brotherhood.

Great words worth reflecting on.

Shelly Bay proceeds

The Herald reports:

Wellington City councillors have voted in favour of selling and leasing land it owns at Shelly Bay.

The decision to sell passed by nine votes to six.

A meeting today on the contentious decision lasted more than seven hours, stretching late into the evening.

Tonight’s vote paves the way for a $500 million development featuring 350 homes to proceed.

In favour: Laurie Foon, Tamatha Paul, Nicola Young, Rebecca Matthews, Diane Calvert, Jenny Condie, Jill Day, Fleur Fitzsimons, Teri O’Neill

Not in favour: Sarah Free, Iona Pannett, Sean Rush, Malcolm Sparrow, Simon Woolf, Andy Foster

Tonight’s defeat is a bitter blow for Mayor Andy Foster, whose campaign was part-funded by the staunchly anti development Sir Peter Jackson and Dame Fran Walsh.

I’m very pleased with this outcome. A no vote would have meant Shelly Bay remains a derelict run down former Air Force base with a cafe as the only major attraction there. The buildings are a horrible eyesore.

The Cassels development looks great and exciting. Not only 350 homes but cafes, bars, restaurants and shops. Even a hotel. Plus walkways and green space. It is likely you’ll have water taxis between Queen’s Wharf and Shelly Bay.

Let’s get on with it.

Maori Party vs Labour

Newshub reports:

Māori Party co-leader Rawiri Waititi is not surprised Labour wants to scrap the rule that brought in their second MP because it would “remove the only true and independent Māori voice from Parliament”.

The rule is known as ‘coat-tailing’. It allows political parties to bring in extra MPs without having to cross the 5 percent threshold if they win an electorate. The number of additional list MPs is based on the percentage of the party’s vote. 

The Māori Party was able to bring in an additional MP thanks to this rule. Waititi won the Waiariki electorate from Labour and he was able to bring in co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer based on the party winning 1.2 percent of the vote. 

Waititi is not surprised Labour wants to get rid of the coat-tail rule because it allowed the Māori Party more representation in Parliament, and Labour currently holds all but one of the seven Māori electorates.

“Of course Jacinda Ardern supports getting rid of the coat-tailing rule in Parliament because this arrangement would remove the only true and independent Māori voice from Parliament,” he told Newshub.

Yep Labour and the Greens want to make it harder for the Maori Party to gain List MPs.

Key portfolio head to heads

Judith Collins has announced her new lineup. Let’s look at who is facing off in the key portfolios.

  • PM: Collins vs Ardern
  • Finance: Bayly & Woodhouse vs Robertson
  • Housing: Willis vs Woods
  • Covid-19 response: Bishop vs Hipkins
  • Education: Goldsmith vs Hipkins
  • Health: Reti vs Little
  • Justice: Bridges vs Faafoi
  • Transport: Woodhouse vs Wood

Will be interesting to see how they all fare next year. I feel a bit sorry for Faafoi as he has to front for repealing three strikes against a former crown prosecutor!

General Debate 12 November 2020