One of the most meaningless stats around is the overall crime rate. Why it is almost meaningless? Because it treats all crimes as equal? 1,000 murders counts the same as 1,000 arrests for cannabis use.

It allows decreases in one category to mask increases in another category. And some categories are very dependent on how proactive Police are, especially arounds drugs, road safety etc. Others are dependent on how likely people are to notify Police (sexual offences)

So I have long articulated that the most useful area to look at is violent offending. Partly because it includes very serious offences, and partly because it is the most likely to be reported. And here is the data from Police.

Now two minor things to note. The 2022 data is for the nine months to September and multiplied by 12/9 to allow comparison. And I have not had time to adjust it for population growth, but doing so would not change the clear impact which is violent crime levels were stable from 2015 to 2017, and have increased almost 40% since then.

Brook Sabin writes:

I’m on the last flight out of Christchurch for the night, and Christopher Luxon is greeted like a long-lost friend by our Air New Zealand crew.

At that point, I take a quick look around the cabin. Some people are paying attention to the video, others aren’t. It’s a pretty typical scene on any flight.

However, I couldn’t help but notice Luxon’s head was down, scrolling on his phone. And it stayed down for almost all the safety video.

Now, paying limited attention to the safety video isn’t earth-shattering, and I’d be a hypocrite for saying so. I have done it on many occasions, and in fact, I wasn’t paying full attention by watching Luxon – which makes me just as bad.

I’ve also seen plenty of other passengers not paying full attention, including on one occasion, the Prime Minister. Back in 2019, in the lead-up to Waitangi Day, I was on a flight with Jacinda Ardern to Kerikeri and watched the Prime Minister talk to an adviser next to her as the flight attendant delivered a manual briefing (the smaller planes don’t have video screens). I was with my partner, and we were both a bit surprised by it at the time.

I’m not. It is almost unnatural to pay attention to something you have already heard 10, 20, 30, 50 times before – often just a day ago.

This is where Air NZ used to be a genius with their videos. They were so funny or interesting you would and could actually view them dozens of times, and even look forward to them. Sadly the latest ones are not in that category.

My general rule is I will listen to a new safety video (in case anything has changed) for the first four of five times, and then I won’t. By this stage I can recite it myself. The exception is if I am in the front row (which is often) as there you don’t get the video, but a flight attendant demonstrating. I regard it as rude to ignore them, so will look up from my Kindle for the briefing.

So I don’t regard Ardern and Luxon as not always listening as anything negative at all. They both fly 400+ times a year, and will know the contents by rote.

But what is fascinating is their reaction to the journalist asking them for comment:

It’s important to point out that I went to both Luxon and Ardern’s office to see if they wanted to respond. I got very different reactions.

Luxon offered a bit of a lighthearted mea culpa via statement:

“I know better than anyone how important it is to pay attention to airline safety videos – even if you’ve seen as many as I have and can recite every word of the All Blacks Men In Black safety song! This is a good reminder that I must do my best to always pay full attention.”

So Luxon isn’t defensive, is straight up.

I was later given the following response, to be attributed to a spokesperson:

“The Prime Minister routinely pays attention to safety briefings on planes.”

And Ardern’s response is the opposite – denial and spin.

It’s a trivial issue, but I thought the contrast in the responses was illuminating, and tells us a lot.

Politically minded?  Thrive supporting a dedicated political lobby group and knowing you’re making a difference.  As Grassroots Coordinator you’ll manage the engagement of supporters through email, phone and at events.  You can grow the role, later taking on campaign work or gain an excellent grounding for parliament or public service.  

Enjoy a busy role; day-to-day it’s all go starting from the 8.30 staff meeting,  You’ll respond to multiple email queries, load and monitor social media posts, coordinate petitions and support the Campaign Managers with communications.  Organise and attend road shows, and A&P type events to arrange community awareness, arranging volunteer support prior.

To succeed in the role you’re…

• Politically minded, you can identify with supporters.  Ideally, you’re University qualified, likely in political studies or communications 
• People oriented; you love connecting and communicating with others 
• Confident within yourself, demonstrated in your dealings with others and your self-belief
• Exceptional at written communication; you can respond to the majority of queries without input and draft complicated responses
• Articulate; your verbal communication assists you to engage with community groups
• Super-efficient and organised; you can handle the influx of inquiries while juggling multiple projects, and prioritising work for the hottest campaign
• Resilient with a sense of humour; you don’t take onboard the occasional hot-headed email and your diplomacy helps you in your response 

The Taxpayers’ Union is New Zealand’s largest political advocacy group, using the power of our 200,000 subscribed members and supporters to fight for Lower Taxes, Less Waste, More Transparency.  We raise awareness and hold politicians to account using hard-hitting original research combined with people power.  We have a nice working environment on Lambton Quay and are a 7-minute walk from the Railway Station.  

So, if you’d love a coordination role where you can become immersed in the important matters of the day, let’s talk! 

https://talent.seek.co.nz/candidates/?id=13584189

UPDATE: Two other roles also available:

• Graduate Researcher (Full Time): You’ll work with our Economist and researchers on research policy projects to support our work, including preparing briefing papers, parliamentary submissions, conducting literature reviews and drafting media release and blog posts. Your research will help to provide the substance to back our campaigns that drive improvements to public policy. 
• Admin Support (Part Time): This is a varied role supporting the team dealing with membership queries and correspondence, database management, and fulfilling merchandise sales. You should be communicative, organised and computer literate with a firm grasp of Word and Excel. You won’t mind doing whatever is needed; you’re just keen to get stuck in and support others to make a difference. 

This is incredible. There are so many families in NZ struggling with housing, and we have a housing programme restricted to Wellington public servants earning up to $95,000 a year. 1,000 apartments have been put aside.

If you are a nurse working in a DHB, you can get an apartment, but a nurse working in a medical centre can’t.

If you do the accounts for a small government agency you can get an apartment, but if you do it for a charity, you can’t.

Wages in the public sector are 24% higher than the private sector, and we have a scheme reserved for public servants earning up to $95,000.

Could you imagine the outrage if this was the other way around. Think if the Government and Council funded a housing programme which was reserved for private sector staff only, and public servants were banned from accessing it?

Housing programmes should be based on need, not on if your employer is public or private sector.

I’m informed that this initiative was originally designed to help low to medium income workers who work in Wellington, live in Wellington. It was intended for baristas, hairdressers etc. There was no restrictions on it being for public sector only.

Then a Labour City Councillor got involved and insisted it be restricted to public sector staff only. And finally after years of pushing, they got their way and it mutated from a scheme to help all low and medium workers to only helping public sector staff earning up to $95,000 (or $150,000 for a couple).

But it gets even worse than that. The takeup for the scheme has been relatively low, because it is restricted to the public sector only, so the Council has declared there is now too much affordable housing, and has reneged on an initiative with a developer who signed up, and said developer is threatening to sue.

So rather than do what is eminently sensible and restore the scheme to its original purpose, and remove the ban on private sector low and medium income workers, the Council is saying that the lack of uptake shows, that there is too much affordable housing in Wellington!!!

Stuff reports:

Labour has been unwilling to detail how it made the “mistake” of voting for the clause, but Ardern has suggested Cabinet ministers and MPs were unaware of the exact contents of the Green Party supplementary order paper Labour voted for.

Luxon on Wednesday suggested in questions that Mahuta, the local government minister, had breached the Cabinet manual by supporting the entrenchment clause in a speech to the House, after Cabinet had previously resolved not to entrench in May.

“Why is she tolerated a minister going against the explicit instructions of her and her Cabinet?”

This is pretty amazing stuff. Cabinet resolved in May not to proceed with entrenchment, yet Mahuta worked with the Greens to support entrenchment, and took their proposal to caucus.

Any other Minister would be gone by now.

If Labour lose the next election, I wonder if Mahuta could replace Ardern as leader. She is obviously the most powerful Minister after Grant Robertson.

I will start by declaring a vested interest. One of my children is a professional fire fighter. As a degree qualified academic and top quality athlete I assumed that, when he declared his interest in FENZ, he would hose in through the application process. Not at all. It was very tough – especially at the interviews – and I am exceedingly proud that he applied five times and worked as an orderly at Auckland hospital for 2 – 3 years to prove that he was tough and dependable. One of my proudest days was being at his FENZ graduation in Rotorua where he had the privilege of speaking for the new Fire Fighters.

These people are very much quiet achievers in our country. You don’t need them until you NEED them. They are then there in spades. As well as their obvious work in attending fires and traffic accidents they are also the first attenders for heart attacks and do a broad range of education and fire prevention work. They thoroughly deserve the contract settlement they have just received.

These men and women do all of the stuff I would simply like to avoid. Climbing ridiculously high ladders, running towards a fire, risking explosions to get people out, crawling into dark and forbidding spaces, attending the carnage of traffic accidents, performing CPR on people who may not make it …

Well done FENZ – you thoroughly deserve the settlement.

They are also a part of an international brotherhood. I have had the privilege of visiting the 9/11 memorials in New York and at The Pentagon. The most moving speech I have ever watched is this one by Jon Stewart to Congress.

The BBC reports:

Iran’s morality police, which is tasked with enforcing the country’s Islamic dress code, is being disbanded, the country’s attorney general says. 

Mohammad Jafar Montazeri’s comments, yet to be confirmed by other agencies, were made at an event on Sunday. 

Iran has seen months of protests over the death of a young woman in custody.

Mahsa Amini had been detained by the morality police for allegedly breaking strict rules on head coverings.

Mr Montazeri was at a religious conference when he was asked if the morality police was being disbanded.

“The morality police had nothing to do with the judiciary and have been shut down from where they were set up,” he said.

Control of the force lies with the interior ministry and not with the judiciary. 

On Saturday, Mr Montazeri also told the Iranian parliament the law that requires women to wear hijabs would be looked at.

If correct, this is a slightly promising sign.

The November 2022 Roy Morgan is out.

Party Vote

• Labour 25.5% (-3.5% from October)
• National 39.0% (+7.0%)
• Greens 12.0% (-3.5%)
• ACT 11.0% (-1.5%)
• Maori 4.0% (+1.0%)
• NZ First 3.5% (nc)
• TOP 2.5% (-0.5%)
• New Conservatives 0.5% (nc)

Seats

• Labour 34 (-31 from election)
• National 51 (+18)
• Greens 16 (+6)
• ACT 14 (+4)
• Maori 5 (+3)

Governments

• Labour/Green 50/120
• National/ACT 65/120

Direction

• Right 35.0% (-7.0%)
• Wrong 55% (+5.0%)

This is the third Roy Morgan poll to show Labour in the 20s, an extraordinary decline from the 50% they got at the election. They would lose a massive 31 MPs on this poll.

Newshub reports:

The Prime Minister has floated the possibility the Government-funded Radio New Zealand could “collapse” if the Government doesn’t move forward with its public media merger.

It was put to Jacinda Ardern on AM that ordinary Kiwis concerned about the current cost of living crisis may want to know how merging Television New Zealand (TVNZ) and Radio New Zealand (RNZ) could save money.

“If we want to make sure that we are supporting New Zealanders through this rough period, getting rid of our public service broadcasters or having Radio New Zealand collapse doesn’t help them and it actually doesn’t help New Zealand,” Ardern replied.

AM host Ryan Bridge picked up on Ardern saying RNZ – a Government-funded service – could collapse. He asked the Prime Minister what the latest advice was that she’s received about how close that is to happening.

For the last year the merger has been a solution looking for a problem, and the Government has been unable to coherently state what problem it will solve.

Now the PM, under pressure, has claimed that it is needed because without the merger, Radio NZ could collapse.

I class this as beyond hyperbole, as a clear lie.

Radio NZ is 100% funded by the Government. It gets zero income from advertising and sponsorship. Unlike private broadcasters, it never has to face revenue drops during recessions etc.

The only way it could collapse, is if the Government chose to do so.

So Ardern raising the spectre of Radio NZ collapsing to justify the merger is desperation.

“This is about projecting to the future. The listenership is declining. You know that. I know that. 

Also a lie, according to no less than Radio NZ itself:

RNZ’s radio audience has increased compared with the previous survey, and audience share has increased slightly from 14.5% to 14.6%.

Also, even if Ardern was correct, a fall in ratings does not mean a fall in revenue for Radio NZ because once again it is fully funded by the Government.

Ardern then explained that misinformation and disinformation are the biggest national securityconcerns in New Zealand. 

So really the merger is about disinformation? Good God.

Labour and Greens have tried to make Three Waters about privatisation, but the voters are not dumb enough to fall for it.

The irony is that far from the right wanting to privatise Three Waters, it is Labour and the Greens who are doing so.

They are passing a law that gives nominal ownership of Three Waters to local councils, but actually places almost all the powers of ownership to these new regional bodies, which are 50% comprised of Iwi representatives.

Now Iwi are part of the private sector. Some like Ngai Tahu are major players in the private sector. So the Government is taking control of Three Waters away from being 100% controlled by the elected public sector, and giving the private sector 50% control of what were formerly public assets.

So what you have is a real confidence trick. A Government that is de facto privatising Three Waters assets, while passing a law saying privatisation is wrong.

The full results are here.

Party Vote

• National 38% (+1% from last poll)
• Labour 33% (-1%)
• ACT 11% (+2%)
• Greens 9% (nc)
• Maori Party 2% (+0.4%)
• NZ First 3.6% (+0.6%)
• TOP 1.7% (+0.4%)
• New Conservatives 0.6% (-0.4%)

11% (-2%) undecided.

Seats

• Labour 42 (-23 from election)
• National 49 (+16)
• ACT 15 (+5)
• Greens 11 (+1)
• Maori 3 (+1)

Government

• National/ACT 64/120
• Labour/Greens 53/120

Preferred PM (unprompted)

• Jacinda Ardern 29% (-1%)
• Christopher Luxon 23% (+2%)
• David Seymour 6% (+2%)
• Chloe Swarbrick 2% (+1%)
• Winston Peters 2% (nc)

Economic Outlook

• Better 18% (-18%)
• Worse 61% (+23%)
• Same 21% (-5%)

Thomas Coughlan writes at NZ Herald:

Broadcasting Minister Willie Jackson would do well to heed the advice of Adrian Orr and cool his jets after this morning’s trainwreck interview on TVNZ’s Q+A with Jack Tame. …

He then decided to give Tame tips on how to conduct a good interview.

“You’re doing such a negative interview today – I’m very disappointed in you,” Jackson said.

Jackson, as the co-author of one of New Zealand’s worst ever broadcast interviews (a bizarre grilling of a friend of an alleged victim of the Roast Busters group), is in no position to be dispensing tips on tradecraft, but nevertheless felt himself qualified to do so.

“You’re hammering every part of this entity,” Jackson complained – and of course Tame was – that’s the whole point. Heaven forbid the new entity prohibits its employees from “hammering” it.

It is very clear that Willie sees the role of TVNZ as being to not challenge the Government. This makes the merger an even worse idea, as the motivating factor appears to be having a large Government controlled media entity dominating the reporting landscape.

The Herald reports:

Introducing an entrenchment provision into Three Waters legislation while the Government is operating under urgency is unconstitutional and undemocratic, the head of the New Zealand Law Society believes.

Law Society president Frazer Barton has penned a letter to Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta, criticising a new clause that was added to the Water Services Entities Bill, known as Three Waters legislation.

Undemocratic and unconstitutional seems to sum up the Government!

The JC reports:

In a guest appearance on conspiracy theorist Infowars online TV show, Kanye West praised Adolf Hitler during an interview with host Alex Jones. …

During the show on Thursday, which featured Mr Jones, Mr West, and Nick Fuentes, a holocaust-denying white supremacist, the host attempted to defend the hip-hop star, saying: “You’re not Hitler, you’re not a Nazi, so you don’t deserve to be demonised.”

Mr West instead pushed back, saying: “Well, I see good things about Hitler also.

“The Jews… I love everyone, and the Jewish people are not going to tell me, ‘You can love us and you can love what we are doing to you with the contracts, and you can love what we are pushing with the pornography”, but this guy [Hitler] that invented highways, invented the very microphone that I use as a musician, you can’t say out loud that this person ever did anything good and I am done with that.”

Mr West, who recently announced his intention to run for president in 2024, added: “I am done with the classifications. Every human being has something of value that they brought to the table, especially Hitler.”

Especially Hitler!!

And this is Donald’s good mate and dining companion. The upside is Ron DeSantis is looking a better and better prospect.

Following the outrageous comments, Mr Jones, in an attempt to distance his own views, said that he did not like Nazis or Hitler, to which Mr West replied, “I like Hitler.”

When Alex Jones starts trying to distance himself from you, you know a line has well and truly been crossed. And then West goes further and declares he actually likes Hitler.

“The Jewish media has made us feel like the Nazis and Hitler have never offered anything of value to the world.”

Funny that.

The Herald reports:

The man today sentenced to three years in prison on New Zealand’s first-ever charges of sabotage was motivated by one purpose; causing as much disruption as he could in an effort to draw attention to his cause.

That cause was a catalogue of fanatical conspiracies surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic and the roll-out of vaccines.

His conviction in his beliefs saw him turn into an almost fulltime campaigner. He had hundreds of followers online, with his postings garnering significant traction within Aotearoa’s conspiracy and “doomsday prepper” circles.

We can now reveal, what many knew, that he tried to bring down part of the national electricity grid. Sabotage was the appropriate charge, as is a jail sentence.

If he had succeeded, he may have killed scores of people, and done tens of millions of damage to families and businesses.

According to one of Philip’s many books, his childhood was marred with abuse and fear. His father, a steel-fabricator he described as a “schizophrenic communist”, emotionally manipulated Philip and his brother David, he wrote, referring to them both exclusively as his “little swines”.

Sounds terrible.

In 1988, his brother David was tried after being alleged to have killed Kyung Eup Lee, a South Korean fisherman, at the Melbourne Railway Station. He was sprung after a letter he wrote saying he had “done in a Korean” was intercepted by New Zealand authorities.

Philip, still in London, flew to Melbourne weeks later to visit his brother.

He arrived to discover it had been alleged David also cooked the man’s body parts in a wok and displayed Lee’s severed penis in the station’s female bathrooms.

Not a healthy family.

In late November, he began to undertake his own attacks. While the details of those attacks remain subject to strict suppression orders, today those orders were relaxed slightly, allowing media to report it was Transpower infrastructure that had been targeted.

The only other facts that can now also be reported are that the offending caused $1.25 million in damage and one of the acts led to a fire.

A lot of people don’t like the Government’s response t Covid-19. But most of them don’t take the law into their onw hand, let alone decide to try and bring down the electricity grid.

Stuff reports:

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern attended a Labour Party caucus meeting where a last-minute entrenchment clause in the Government’s controversial Three Waters legislation was discussed, despite her saying on Monday it was “not necessarily something I would be aware of”. …

Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta confirmed, through a spokesperson, the change to the bill was discussed with the Labour caucus – a meeting of all its MPs – in advance of the House sitting.

“We knew it was novel and may not pass the constitutional threshold, but it was still worthy of consideration,” Mahuta said, in an emailed response to questions.

This is Nanaia throwing Jacinda under the bus, after Ardern and Hipkins said they knew nothing about the amendment they voted for. Everyone assumed that the SOP by the Greens was tabled at the last minute, and Mahuta as the Minister in charge decided to have Labour vote for it, on the fly.

But the reality is that Mahuta took the Green SOP to the Labour caucus, and it was either explicitly approved, or there was no objection to it.

This makes it a huge credibility issue for the Prime Minister. I can only think of four explanations, to reconcile what she said, to what we now know.

She wasn’t listening in caucus

Maybe she was bored with Three Waters, and despite the fact she chairs Caucus, she wasn’t listening to Mahuta and didn’t think she had to pay attention to what was being said.

She didn’t understand

Maybe she simply didn’t understand what Mahuta was saying. She may have got confused.

She forgot

Maybe she forgot it was discussed at caucus, even thought it was just a week ago.

She lied

This is the fallback option, if none of the other three explanations are credible.

Bill Bennett writes:

One day shortly before Christmas, a Chorus contractor will connect a slender strand of glass fibre to a family home and power up the hardware needed to drive it.

When that line lights up and the data starts flowing, the 11-year Ultra Fast Fibre project will finally end.

From where we are in late 2022, the wisdom of building a nationwide fibre network looks obvious. That wasn’t the case when Sir John Key and Steven Joyce first planned the network in 2008 while preparing that year’s election manifesto. Critics saw it as a high-risk project.

The Ultra Fast Broadband (UFB) programme they developed has been a success by any standard. The initial goal was to connect 75 per cent of the nation — in cities and towns — to the network over a nine-year build. As the network grew, and people saw the benefits of fast, reliable broadband demand soared well ahead of initial projections. It was so popular successive governments revisited the plans twice and funded the UFB2 and UFB2+ extensions.

At an event to mark the end of the project, Chorus CEO JB Rousselot noted that 87 per cent of New Zealanders will now be able to access the fibre cable passing their gate

I was one of those early advocates, and recall significant scepticism. Some people claimed there was no need, for speeds that fast, and others that VDSL would be just as good,

It was a hugely ambitious project, and delivered huge results for New Zealand. 87% of homes can now have fibre connections, Telecom got split into Spark and Chorus, and it was all done within budget. Steven Joyce and Amy Adams oversaw an incredibly competent and vital project, which stands in huge contrast to today’s Government that promised light rail to be completed by 2020, and now are saying they may approve a business case by 2025.

The UFB project is a good reminder of what Government can achieve when it works with the private sector, and when it is competent.