General Debate 19 September 2023
The Herald reports:
A hīkoi has begun from Northland to Parliament to oppose National and ACT’s gang policies and highlight the impact they could have on the whānau of gang members.
The 10-person strong trip, led by Matilda Kahotea (Ngāti Pūkenga), is stopping off at marae and gang houses along the way to explain the policies, get signatures for a petition and to encourage people to vote.
The fact gangs are so against a change of Government tell us a lot. They know they have never had it better.
Stuff reports:
Labour is re-promising to lift the age of eligibility for free breast cancer screening, just a few months after saying there weren’t enough health workers for the expansion to go ahead.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins and the party’s women’s caucus delivered their pitch to women on Sunday, including the promise of extended breast screening.
This is a 2017 Labour and NZ First coalition commitment, which hasn’t been actioned despite calls from the Opposition and Breast Cancer Foundation.
So Labour promised to do this in 2017, failed to do it for six years, said it was not possible earlier this year, and now suddenly it is promising to do it again.
They really do think we’re all stupid.
Alex Holland writes:
Race based special treatment rather than treatment based on need (for any ethnicity) is becoming a real issue. Two out of every three voters believe NZ has become more divided. Here are some of the rights & funding ring-fenced by one human attribute (ancestry), many of which have been introduced under this Labour government:
Stuff reports:
A man forbidden from driving took methamphetamine hours before driving an unregistered, unwarranted car at more than 200kph, losing control and killing a dad of two.
Brydon Boyce, 43, on Friday admitted a charge of manslaughter in relation to a crash in Havelock North that claimed the life of Marco Milliaccio, a football-loving dad of a young son and daughter.
Boyce had been forbidden from driving since 2017. The car was not registered or warranted and was considered unwarrantable.
One of his mates was in the front passenger’s seat; the other was in the back seat. Neither was wearing a seatbelt. …
Two experts analysed the CCTV video. One expert calculated that the vehicle was travelling between 200kph and 250kph, and the other calculated an average vehicle speed of 214kph.
The crash investigators calculated Boyce’s speed at the time of the crash at 115kph. Milliaccio had been driving at between 36 and 49kph. Milliaccio’s car was pushed 19 metres backwards onto the grass verge as a result of the impact. …
When police searched his car they found 128.66 grams of methamphetamine packaged in 57 different sized plastic resealable zip lock bags and containers, stored in the boot of the vehicle. They also found 58.58 grams of cannabis plant in three resealable plastic bags, 2.59 grams of pseudoephedrine, $11,365 cash, a loaded pistol and ammunition.
He has pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of Milliaccio, two charges of reckless driving causing injury, possession of methamphetamine for supply, possession of cannabis for sale, possession of pseudoephedrine, unlawful possession of a pistol and unlawful possession of ammunition.
So he was driving high on meth at speeds over 200 km/hr in a car with no registration or warrant and was a banned driver. He killed an innocent person who was driving safely.
The recklessness in this case was so massive, I do wonder if he should have been charged with murder instead of manslaughter. The Crimes Act does say a homicide can be murder if:
if the offender for any unlawful object does an act that he or she knows to be likely to cause death, and thereby kills any person, though he or she may have desired that his or her object should be effected without hurting any one.
I think you can make the case the act of driving so fast was likely to cause death.
A reader writes in:
Labour vs National top 20 in electorate seats
*presumed top 20
When the Labour and National lists came out I was very intrigued by the electorate spread the two parties had across their top 20 list positions who are running for electorate ( a vaguely decent proxy for ideal Cabinet positions, ignoring list only MPs).
As you can see, in only 1 seat – Hutt South – do 2 prospective Cabinet Ministers face off. In all other 19 spots, there is no face off between a National and a Labour heavyweight. This even holds true if you include the electorates where “Cabinet Minister/ Speaker” list only MPs standing down this election have held sway – Wellington Central (Robertson), Te Tai Hauauru (Rurawhe) – even Ilam (Brownlee) if you want to go that far. You have to go down to number 26 on the list Belich (Epsom) to find the next “heavyweight” duel.
There are a number of probable explanatory factors in play – Labour’s reliance on the Māori seats, where National has little credit in the bank, Labour’s high number of list only places in their top 20. the loss of so many National electorate seats at the last election- but the level of different focus is striking, and I wonder to what degree it differs from previous elections. It seems strange to me that there are not more common battleground prestige seats, such as the Central seats, in Wellington, Auckland, Christchurch ( of which only Christchurch makes this list at all!), or major provincial city seats Hamilton, Tauranga, Dunedin – looking at you. Is this just a highly unusual convergence of factors, or are we seeing a strong split of the major parties in the seats that they consider most important?
This leads me to my second analysis – geographic spread of these “Cabinet Minister” seats between the two parties. Once again we see some striking differences. For this analysis’ sake let’s throw back in those list only presumptive Cabinet Ministers who are only stepping out of electorate races this election, so have a clear geographic tie to a seat still. So Wellington Central, Te Tai Hauauru and Ilam in for Palmerston North, Panmure-Otahuhu and Napier (acknowledging that the 3 we’re removing are highly unlikely to feature in any immediate Cabinet post-election, while those coming back in are presumptively cabinet ministers or Speaker). This gives us:
Labour
5 Maori seats (Te Tai Tokerau, Tamaki Makaurau, Te Tai Hauauru, Hauraki-Waikato, Te Tai Tonga)
5 Wellington-ish seats (Wellington Central, Mana, Hutt South, Remutaka, Wairarapa)
5 South Island seats – 2 Christchurch (Christchurch Central, Wigram, Dunedin, Rangitata, West-Coast Tasman)
2 other North Island seats (Northland, Tauranga)
3 Auckland seats (Kelston, Maungakiekie, New Lynn)
National
0 Māori seats
2 Wellington-ish seats (Ohariu, Hutt South)
4 South Island seats – 3 Christchurch (Ilam, Waimakariri, Selwyn, Invercargill)
5 other North Island seats (Whangarei, Taupo, Rotorua, Port Waikato, Rangitikei)
9! Auckland seats (Botany, Epsom, East Coast Bays, Pakuranga, Papakura, Whangaparaoa, Mt Albert, North Shore, Kaipara ki Mahurangi)
Even with some appropriate caveats -prominent list only MPs for Labour in Auckland (Jackson, Parker), the Māori seats being a major point of difference- the differences are stark. Labour places much more than population focus on Wellington and on the Maori seats, and much much less than population on Auckland. National is majorly overrepresented in Auckland, and surprisingly less in the South Island and rural electorates than stereotypes might have made us suspect. Does this reflect electoral strategy? A possible attempt at harnessing an anti-COVID Auckland backlash? Is it all simply random, just a product of where the parties’ most competent MPs just happen to be based? Happy to let you be the judge, but interested to hear your thoughts.
The Herald reports:
Drug addicts will face the prospect of losing their benefit if they refuse treatment or don’t make efforts to find work, the Act Party leader says.
David Seymour who is visiting Christchurch today has announced the party’s policy on welfare which takes a harder line on drug addicts and those on sickness benefits, including those who suffer from long-term stress.
Act wants to reduce the current number of 4000 people who receive the Supported Living Payment because of stress, 70 per cent of them for more than five years.
Stress is a condition that can be treated over time, not a permanent incapacity, the party says.
Act says 4100 people receive a benefit because they are addicted to drugs, costing taxpayers $76 million a year. About 2700 of them are on the Jobseeker benefit and almost 30 per cent of them have received it for more than six years.
“Either they’re choosing not to comply with the obligations of their benefit, or their addiction is so far gone that they can’t comply,” Seymour said.
More than 1000 have been receiving a benefit for more than 10 years.
Drug addiction should be treated, not funded.
The top 10 NZ First list candidates are:
1. Winston Peters (List)
2. Shane Jones (Northland)
3. Casey Costello (Port Waikato)
4. Mark Patterson (Taieri)
5. Jenny Marcroft (Kaipara Ki Mahurangi)
6. Jamie Arbuckle (Kaikoura)
7. Andy Foster (Mana)
8. Tanya Unkovich (Epsom)
9. David Wilson (Upper Harbour)
10. Erika Harvey (Tauranga)
The Post has some interesting results on some issues questions asked by Freshwater. The net agreement for each statement is:
So much more support than opposition for a referendum on co-governance and referring to government departments by their English name.
Mild net support for a gender quota for Parliament and mild net opposition to ethnic quotas.
Moderate net opposition to bilingual road signs and more co-governance.
A Newshub Nation Reid Research poll found:
Party Vote
Candidate Vote
This is a very good result for National and Scott Sheeran. Omer is an incumbent (List) MP and Paul an incumbent City Councillor yet Sheeran is ahead of Paul and just behind Omer.
ACT are not standing in Wellington Central, so their 3.5% is likely to go to Sheeran also. It is a very tight three way race, which is amazing considering Robertson has a 19,000 majority.
NewstalkZB reports:
A Restore Passenger Rail protestor is standing by the group’s decision to spray-paint a luxury Wellington car dealership.
Three protestors threw paint at the Gazley Motor Group building on Cambridge Terrace and glued themselves to the footpath.
The trio were subsequently arrested and charges are being considered.
Spokesperson James Cockle claims the luxury cars sold by the dealership are a symbol of excess and wealth inequality impacting this country.
“It correlates directly to the damage that’s being done to our planet. We’re sending a strong message to the New Zealand people- let’s stand up against luxury emissions and reign in the excesses of the mega-rich.”
Almost laughing out loud at the belief that someone who buys a Gazley car is mega-rich, let alone the Communist type belief that no one should have any wealth.
Mr Cockle is of course a Green Party member who recently stood for the co-leadership. He also somehow manages to travel from Dunedin to Wellington to take part in protests, all without creating any emissions himself. Amazing.
Newshub reports:
Labour to campaign on overhauling consent laws, put onus to prove victim said ‘yes’ to alleged perpetrator
This is a radical proposed change to our criminal justice system. What Labour is proposing is that anyone accused of rape is deemed guilty under the law (if sex occurred) unless they can prove consent.
So under Labour you will be deemed guilty unless you can prove you are innocent.
Currently, the victim has to prove in court they did not consent. Labour’s now promising, if elected, they’ll change the law so the accused to prove they did have consent.
Labour’s police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said it’s an important step.
I would have thought the Law Society might have something to say about Labour proposing to legislate to make people guilty by default.
The Herald has a great article that look at what net debt has been projected to be in 2027 under each forecast since 2021 (so post Covid).
So in less than two years, the debt forecast for the next four years has increased by a massive $55 billion.
1 News reports on the approval ratings for Hipkins and Luxon.
What a huge slide for Hipkins.
Stats NZ reports:
Annual food prices were 8.9 percent higher in August 2023 than in August 2022, according to figures released by Stats NZ today.
That’s better than 12% but the cumulative impact of two years of runaway increases has been massive .
The full results are here.
Party Vote
Preferred PM (unprompted)
News.com.au reports:
The poll also found that Labor voters are deserting the party line, with 57 per cent of its supporter base planning to vote Yes and 43 per cent No.
By contrast, the RedBridge poll found that 87 per cent of Coalition supporters were planning to vote in line with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s No camp.
It has no chance of passing if Labor’s own voters are so split.
Stuff reports:
Defendants facing serious charges were among those given a $75 Prezzy Card for attending meetings in Hawke’s Bay courts to share their court experiences and ideas, and to “re-imagine the District and Family Court” in the region.
What a great idea. Pay criminals to share their experience on how they think the courts should work.
The ministry didn’t know how many attendees were defendants or victims.
Surely this would be useful stuff to know.
The Pre-election fiscal update confirms massive deficits and debt.
The forecast of a potential surplus in four years is wishful rather than realistic. Even if forecasts of the economy in four year times were accurate, the assumptions are a level of fiscal discipline that the current Government has shown it is incapable of achieving.
The more useful numbers are what will happen this year, and probably next year.
Treasury are saying that in the year just ended we will have a massive $10 billion deficit and in the current year an even larger $11.4 billion deficit. Debt in just two years will go from $71 billion to $100 billion.